Pakistan-Af: Operation Khyber Storm

Status
Not open for further replies.
well we just agreed to a immediate ceasefire
Just dont tell Red Hat. I'm telling you he will drive a jeep to the border and spark an international incident.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Guys be nice to my man @Jango he is a very respected and valued old member of the forum.

We can all share our opinions and asking questions are only fair.

Chill maro guys and eat ganderi.
View attachment 154853
پہلے ہی پیٹ خراب ہوگیا کچھ لوگوں کے خیالی پُلاؤ کھا کے

اب اگر ان کی جھوٹی گنڈیری کھا لی

تو اگلے پورے مہینے
ORS
اور
drip
پر گزارہ ہوگا
 
1760829009657.png

Ceasefire with a guy who say they will get land up to Attock one day. Talibunds are nationalists with jihadi mindset. Meanwhile post Zia this khassi state have brought up 2 generations with retarded ummah chuma mindset where borders are haram.

Afghans with dysfunctional state are more nationalists then pakis.
 
پہلے ہی پیٹ خراب ہوگیا کچھ لوگوں کے خیالی پُلاؤ کھا کے

اب اگر ان کی جھوٹی گنڈیری کھا لی

تو اگلے پورے مہینے
ORS
اور
drip
پر گزارہ ہوگا
Okay sir no ganderi for you... For you especial F16 Naswar.20251012_025451.jpg
🤣
 
View attachment 154861

Ceasefire with a guy who say they will get land up to Attock one day. Talibunds are nationalists with jihadi mindset. Meanwhile post Zia this khassi state have brought up 2 generations with retarded ummah chuma mindset where borders are haram.

Afghans with dysfunctional state are more nationalists then pakis.
Because the Afghani nutjobs have nothing to lose - it’s all about their “honor”
Meanwhile what does the Khawaja Sipah have in terms of overseas properties and interests?
 
Thr threats to the Marriott and Naval recruitment center in Karachi and other high profile targets is very real and credible.
Pakistan toot nai raha inn sab se.

Pakistan doesn't support or refuge groups like IS, AQ, Daesh etc. Now Taliban are another faction whom Pakistan will never support. Syria, Egypt, Libya, Lebanon, etc have been destroyed. So basically the excuse to invade Pakistan by any western power is gone forever, for sake of unsafe nukes also. Last straw to be unearthed are the likes of TLP, etc. So even if India keeps screaming that Pakistan is harboring terrorists, exactly which ones ? LeT. The west isnt bothered with LeT.
The amount of terrorist attacks that India has financed and backed against Pakistan, makes India lose credibility when shouting "terrorism". In fact, have you seen how the global attention from Phalagam attack shifted to Indian Military getting thrashed by Pakistan Military. The world started discussing Pakistan's mature response, Rafales shot down and Indian failure as a military and on global diplomatic front. India's narrative against Pakistan fell so short that the world leaders embraced Pakistan with dignity instead of blaming Pakistan for Pahalgam attack. This is continuing even now. Can you feel the Indian plight ? They wanted the world to blame Pakistan, but how the tables turned and Pakistan is getting respect globally at all summits and meetings.

Indian Pahalgam attack narrative is a classic moral story - the one who digs the ditch, himself falls into it.

To be continued...
 
No one can be trusted with the entire geography of Afghanistan, especially when it is clear and proven time and again that whoever is at the forefront of leading Afghanistan, at any given time, practices a form of religion, which is very extreme and starkly contrasts with the form of religion that is practised in Pakistan or Iran.

Balkanization of Afghanistan Is the only viable solution to the 8 decades old threat that is posed on our western border. Division along ethnic lines ensures that there are many centres of power, and that no single sect of religion / ethnicity is strong enough to pose any real threat to our country.

If there is credible evidence that our enemies have invested heavily in Afghanistan, that a Muslim is taking the help of a non-Muslim, against a Muslim neighbour, then what kind of Islamic ideology, is preventing us from a full force attack against Afghanistan?

The extremist ideology that is practised by the militants in Afghanistan, aligns with some sections of our society that poses a credible threat and must be eliminated with a blitzkrieg. The geography of Afghanistan should be Balkanized into different ethnicities, with the provinces bordering Pakistan, being annexed, of course, after a quick referendum, and becoming a part of Pakistan, uniting the majority of the Pashtun and Baloch factions, from across the border.

Tajiks, Uzbeks, Kyrgyz and hazara population should be allowed to become independent or if they choose, to be a part of their countries of origin, bordering Afghanistan, should be allowed to become part of that specific country. The bigger land that is left to the extremists to govern, the more chances that Pakistan might be pinned down on the western border for eternity, bleeding Pakistan by a thousand cuts / wounds.

If I were to annotate this (in words) to show the Afghan provinces most aligned with Pakistan:

1. The Pashtun belt in Afghanistan (south & southeast), especially provinces like Nangarhar, Kunar, Paktia, Paktika, Khost, Kandahar, Zabul, Helmand, align with Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa & Balochistan.

2. The Baloch areas (in southwestern Afghanistan: Nimruz, parts of Helmand, etc.) align with Pakistani Balochistan.

With the Help of AI, the following should become part of Pakistan:

Afghan Provinces Closely Aligned with 🇵🇰 Pakistan
Because Afghanistan and Pakistan share a 2,640 km border (the Durand Line), several Afghan provinces directly connect — ethnically, linguistically, and economically — with adjacent Pakistani regions.
________________________________________
1. Nangarhar Province
• Bordering Pakistani areas: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Khyber & Mohmand Districts)
• Dominant ethnicity: Pashtun (99%) — tribes like Mohmand, Shinwari, and Khogyani straddle both sides of the border.
• Cultural link: Very strong — same language (Pashto), same tribal structures, and heavy cross-border movement for trade and family ties.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Peshawar region.
________________________________________
2. Kunar Province
• Bordering: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Dir, Chitral, Bajaur)
• Ethnicity: Pashtun, with Nuristani minorities.
• Link strength: Very high — linguistically and tribally connected; strong cultural overlap.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Bajaur and Lower Dir.
________________________________________
3. Paktia Province
• Bordering: Kurram District (KPK)
• Ethnicity: Pashtun (Ghilzai and Zadran tribes)
• Connection: Cross-border tribal intermarriages; similar dialects and cultural customs.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Parachinar area.
________________________________________
4. Paktika Province
• Bordering: South Waziristan (KPK) and North Waziristan
• Ethnicity: Pashtun (Ghilzai and Wazir tribes)
• Connection: Tribal overlap (Wazir and Mehsud tribes live on both sides).
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Waziristan regions.
________________________________________
5. Khost Province
• Bordering: North Waziristan
• Ethnicity: Pashtun (Zadran, Mangal)
• Connection: Same tribal confederations and cross-border kinship.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Bannu–Miranshah belt.
________________________________________
6. Kandahar Province
• Bordering: Balochistan (Quetta–Chaman region)
• Ethnicity: Pashtun (mainly Durrani confederation)
• Connection: Historical trade route; strong kinship with Pashtuns in Quetta and Zhob.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Quetta Division.
________________________________________
7. Helmand Province
• Bordering: Balochistan (Nushki and Chagai areas)
• Ethnicity: Pashtun (Noorzai, Alizai) with minority Baloch tribes.
• Connection: Trade and nomadic migration between Helmand and Pakistani Balochistan.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Nushki and Dalbandin.
________________________________________
8. Nimruz Province
• Bordering: Balochistan (Chagai District) and Iran
• Ethnicity: Baloch (majority) with Pashtun and Brahui minorities.
• Connection: Shared Baloch culture and language across Pakistan’s and Iran’s borders.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Dalbandin and Taftan region.
________________________________________
9. Zabul Province
• Bordering: Balochistan (Qila Saifullah region)
• Ethnicity: Pashtun (Hotak, Tokhi)
• Connection: Linguistic and tribal continuity with Pakistani Balochistan Pashtuns.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Qila Saifullah and Loralai.
________________________________________
10. Kunar–Nangarhar–Paktia–Paktika–Khost–Kandahar–Zabul–Helmand–Nimruz
👉 These nine provinces form Afghanistan’s southeastern and southern belt, which:
• Shares direct borders with Pakistan.
• Is predominantly Pashtun (plus Baloch in the southwest).
• Has deep cultural, linguistic, and tribal overlap with Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan provinces.

Balkanization of Afghanistan will ensure no safe haven for afghan terrorists in any country. BTW this is the map of pashtun majority areas of Afghanistan.

The green is still pashtun minority despite centuries of migration. Imagine in near future you have both Khorasan and Pakistan pounding talibunds terrorists. With no border with anyone else they will quickly come to senses and pashtunistan will merge with Pakistan as 5th province named Afghania.

1760829411486.png
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Wonder how long this will last, knowing TTP and India are itching to cause damage on Pak side....
 
Because the Afghani nutjobs have nothing to lose - it’s all about their “honor”
Meanwhile what does the Khawaja Sipah have in terms of overseas properties and interests?

Its impressure that talibans who got their jihadi mindset in madrassas of Zia Ul Haq in Pakistan still retain their nationalist tendencies. Which Pakistanis have long forgotten and also believed that Taliban will be their natural allies once in power.
 
Some collateral damage is to be expected when striking population centers.

Islamically, if they use innocent Muslims as human shields and the cost of not attacking will result in more harm than good, then it becomes permissible to even kill innocent Muslims in the process while intending not to kill them.

This could be them preparing suicide bombers or IEDs in their homes or setting up artillery around civilians to attack.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top