Pakistan Air Force | News & Discussions

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


From 24:00 onwards in this video AM Masood Akhtar is saying one AWACS got damaged at bholari.

Is this correct?
 
TallGuy said:
rumor mill counts 3 x Rafale , 1 x Su-30MKI, 1 x MiG-29UPG and 1 x Mirage 2000
plus 1 x Drone (Heron)
Click to expand...
Who can tell me why PAF has not claimed a Mirage 2000 even though we saw its (almost conclusive) wreckage in the Pampore, fell on the school - Kashmiri firefighters night video?

Then I will give you my findings.
 
m52k85 said:
Who can tell me why PAF has not claimed a Mirage 2000 even though we saw its (almost conclusive) wreckage in the Pampore, fell on the school - Kashmiri firefighters night video?

Then I will give you my findings.
Click to expand...
that is a million dollar question i am wondering my self, but in one of the interviews, it was claimed to be 7 includes 6 fighters and 1 HALE drone
 
Dreamer said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


From 24:00 onwards in this video AM Masood Akhtar is saying one AWACS got damaged at bholari.

Is this correct?
Click to expand...

I had suspected as much and is most likely correct. PAF admitted in the ISPR press conference that an aircraft was damaged and the strike on the HAS meant for Saab 2000 affirms it for me at least that one was damaged. The extent of the damage we don't know, but given prior experience, it will be repaired hopefully.

This is why I am curious to know what we targeted (besides S400 or their depots or runways) and if we actually went for their AWACS for P-8s. If not, it would be a huge lost opportunity.
 
GriffinsRule said:
I had suspected as much and is most likely correct. PAF admitted in the ISPR press conference that an aircraft was damaged and the strike on the HAS meant for Saab 2000 affirms it for me at least that one was damaged. The extent of the damage we don't know, but given prior experience, it will be repaired hopefully.

This is why I am curious to know what we targeted (besides S400 or their depots or runways) and if we actually went for their AWACS for P-8s. If not, it would be a huge lost opportunity.
Click to expand...

Could be any aircraft, I think possibly C-130, but if it is a C-130 or SAAB (and it may be a non Erieye Saab as we have 5 of those), repair is easy.

Agree, would be interesting to see what we did to them, lack of good sat pics for our hits
 
  • Like
Reactions: TAC
GriffinsRule said:
I had suspected as much and is most likely correct. PAF admitted in the ISPR press conference that an aircraft was damaged and the strike on the HAS meant for Saab 2000 affirms it for me at least that one was damaged. The extent of the damage we don't know, but given prior experience, it will be repaired hopefully.

This is why I am curious to know what we targeted (besides S400 or their depots or runways) and if we actually went for their AWACS for P-8s. If not, it would be a huge lost opportunity.
Click to expand...

Panzerkiel had confirmed a C130 had experienced light damage, beyond that no one has mentioned any other platform being damaged.

IAF has not made any claim on a Saab 2000 being damaged, and given their lack of success if they had a sniff of success they would be shouting at it from the roof tops right now. They are not. This means, the whole story of Saab 2000 is a non story. We stop continually propagating a false narrative.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (members: 1, guests: 3)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top