ziaulislam
Elite Member
Also thread deleted yeah happening alot recently
I guess i wonder whats the difference between this and old forum.
I guess i wonder whats the difference between this and old forum.
Pakistan Constitutional Amendments:
- Thread starter ghazi52
- Start date
Goenitz
Elite Member
There is nothing constitutional or rational about it. It is just a power grab by elites. There is no representative parliament, but a building held hostage by a barrel of guns, masking a loot.
Asfandyar Bhittani
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
All Hail supreme leader Al Sisi 2.0.
bravo_1
Registered Member
bravo_1
Registered Member
He's slow, give him some time ⏲
Toxic
Trusted Member
Asim Munir now has the same powers as Parvez Musharraf. He’s got constitutional protection, immunity from prosecution and can only be removed via a 2/3rd majority of the parliament and he is only 57 meaning he is going nowhere for a long while
mythbuster
Trusted Member
We need a strong leader
HeratKabul
SpeedLimited
They keep awam distracted with Afghanistan, Kashmir, Gaza and continue to consolidate their firm grip on people, judiciary, media, land and all tax money.
They have been doing this since generations and will continue doing the same with your children, grand children and great grand children.
IK was your last hope to break free from this boot rule but sadly you people abandoned him.
They have been doing this since generations and will continue doing the same with your children, grand children and great grand children.
IK was your last hope to break free from this boot rule but sadly you people abandoned him.
Last edited:
Fatman17
Moderator
According to the draft tabled in the Senate today, the amendment would make the Chief of the Army Staff the constitutionally recognised Chief of the Defence Forces, effectively merging the army chief’s current authority with a new overarching title that places him at the top of Pakistan’s armed services.
How does the 27th Constitutional Amendment Bill change the military leadership structure?
Changes proposed to Article 243 vest broader, constitutionally protected powers and privileges to the country's top military leadership.
www.dawn.com
Fatman17
Moderator
Funeral of judicial independence
At the heart of the amendment is the creation of a new apex court: the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC). Inserted into the Constitution as Chapter 1A, the FCC would have its own chief justice — serving a fixed three-year term — and judges, who may be appointed from the Supreme Court (SC), senior High Court (HC) judges with at least seven years of experience, or very senior advocates with over two decades in practice. Judges would retire at 68.
The amendment further stipulates that the president may transfer a high court judge from one high court to another on the recommendation of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan. A judge of a high court who does not accept a transfer under this Article shall be deemed to have retired from his office.
At the heart of the amendment is the creation of a new apex court: the Federal Constitutional Court (FCC). Inserted into the Constitution as Chapter 1A, the FCC would have its own chief justice — serving a fixed three-year term — and judges, who may be appointed from the Supreme Court (SC), senior High Court (HC) judges with at least seven years of experience, or very senior advocates with over two decades in practice. Judges would retire at 68.
The amendment further stipulates that the president may transfer a high court judge from one high court to another on the recommendation of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan. A judge of a high court who does not accept a transfer under this Article shall be deemed to have retired from his office.
‘Funeral of judicial independence’: How proposed constitutional changes affect structure of Pakistan’s judiciary
"In essence, this amendment seeks to strip the judiciary of the remaining vestiges of independence that one could possibly conceive to remain within it," says lawyer Basil Nabi Malik.
www.dawn.com
Desprado123
Registered Member
This was bound to happen. When judges are not giving decision based on facts or documents on hand but rather they give decision based on social media trends judges uncle video made by pti to influence, wife and kids influence, making SC a head office of pti, giving decision based on fabricated videos, becoming a party activist rather than judge etc.
Judges knows who is right or wrong but fact is that anywhere around the world decision are giving based on documents avaliable as judges and court are not admin or excutivie authority and in Pakistan just to entertain one party it officially became a head office of PTI.
Judges knows who is right or wrong but fact is that anywhere around the world decision are giving based on documents avaliable as judges and court are not admin or excutivie authority and in Pakistan just to entertain one party it officially became a head office of PTI.
MasterChief
Registered Member
Someone was not happy with shooting down Rafales without calling the head of the Politburo in PakistanAccording to the draft tabled in the Senate today, the amendment would make the Chief of the Army Staff the constitutionally recognised Chief of the Defence Forces, effectively merging the army chief’s current authority with a new overarching title that places him at the top of Pakistan’s armed services.
How does the 27th Constitutional Amendment Bill change the military leadership structure?
Changes proposed to Article 243 vest broader, constitutionally protected powers and privileges to the country's top military leadership.www.dawn.com
Pakistan Defence Latest
Country Watch Latest
-
The deal for 48 F-35 fighters.. How can it reshape Saudi air power in the Middle East? (14 Viewers)
- Latest: Pakistan First
-
-
-
-
