Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

Goenitz said:
Valid question. India will certainly send some small FPV fibre-guided drones to BLA/TTP to attack our Air Force assets, as IAF/IA tried their best to attack their nightmare (PAF) several times.
Click to expand...
every action has a reaction, i am saying very politely, other may not be this polite. Sending armed drones is against UN laws and is like declaring a war on any country
 
deep said:
Just shooting two or three fighter jets after they successfully bombed the target , drone attack all over , missiles destroying air bases and every missile and hundred of drone intercepted by the enemy if one call it a victory then I want defeat in every war..
Click to expand...
I'm just quoting an International article that is run by military Analysts. For sure they know more than you and me.

We all have our biases, but we Pakistanis have learned to accept our past military mistakes. That is how we have improved to the point where we are making better defense strategies against India. If you do not accept your mistakes through independent means, then you will make even more mistakes. Be my guest if you do not agree with what everyone is saying. It plays even more in our favour, no problem with us.
 
Corax said:
^^^ This!! I've said it repeatedly before, given the relatively short distances between the two, any conflict will eventually quickly lead to missile strikes and the most effective option, relative to risky air strikes, as the Indians learnt. The country that can defend itself against missiles strikes, while avoiding its missiles from being intercepted, will be the ultimate victor. I expect India to boost its equivalent GMLRS and Brahmos, and both countries to bolster their IADS.
Click to expand...

Both countries are not same. India can move their assets 2000km away from border, Pakistan cant.

We are not playing game on Indian terms here. Any attack on our assets will be retaliated with disproportionate response.

Thats why retaliation 2.0 was going to be Indian economic hubs. And then even nuclear strikes.
 
GHCQ restraint on PAF during the aerial combat made the whole bloody thing worse for us Question will need to be asked to GHCQ why holding back PAF this decision was taken? Letting the enemy off the hook it began to fire desperately drones at Pakistan cities. PAF clearly had the advantage and momentum to end it on that very first day combat. Heads should role at the top this could have horribly turned out differently for us. And no lessons have been learnt from 2019 sane BS restraints again. Only for the enemy to buy a new weapon platform and try their luck again 😠. Eventually they will break thru if you continue this BS!!!
 
one can have gloves resistant to acid but acid is not meant to provide protection, in the first place
 
India is panicking because soon enough PAF will have gen 5 aircraft. This is why Pakistan is on high alert for renewal of hostilities. It's a question of when, not if. Enjoy the arms race triggered by hindutva belligerence.
 
r3alist said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

I think India and Pakistan were surprised that JD Vance said let them fight it's not our business. Spooked is not the right word I'd used of the reaction of both nations but it's not far off either. I think cht got real for both nations when it looked like both nations would have to figure it out by themselves how to end it and as the conflict started to escalate heading towards a path that nobody wanted that is when US/Orange man stepped in. Vance let them fight it out comment was a tactic by Trump administration.

China or Russia was not going to be able to mediate a ceasefire for obvious reasons only the US has this ability. There's a lot of hate towards the US and some of that hate is rightfully earned but when needed to stop a conflict between nuke nations the US still has some good use.

I'm starting to think that war between nuke nations will never escalate to the point where nukes might be used. A conflict between US and China over Taiwan will never get close to nuclear I think both know how far to take it before stepping back.

This Indian Pakistani conflict we just witness is as far/bad as it will ever get between both nuclear powers. Having nukes has really tied the hands of India and Pakistan on how far they can take a conflict against each other. If both nations had no nukes this conflict would be ugly right now with naval and land forces taking part.
 
Cash gk said:
When a country’s leader lacks self-respect, decisions are made under pressure, and even your victory is rendered meaningless.

As long as India was attacking Pakistan, the U.S. had nothing to do with it.

But the moment Pakistan started hitting back, suddenly the U.S. got
involved—and even issued a statement!

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

If Pakistan was Palestine they would have just remained quite and let the hindutva murder us and our children

The only reason they stepped in was because we were hitting back and could escalate

The lesson for the Muslim world and the rest of the world is there

Prepare and carry a big stick, you may need it
 
Goenitz said:
Valid question. India will certainly send some small FPV fibre-guided drones to BLA/TTP to attack our Air Force assets, as IAF/IA tried their best to attack their nightmare (PAF) several times.
Click to expand...
We might expect a different behavior form India now:

  • Pakistan destroyed the Terror Training Camps in Rajouri, India, the ones training BLA, TTP and others. That will certainly set them back.
  • We had the joint conference between China/Pakistan/Iran. Afghans gave it a real high protocol and Afghanistan was declaring that they will work with its neighbours to start on a path of prosperity. Looks like their mind is changing now
  • Finally, India should lose interest in using Pakistan as a scapegoat for their election campaigns. They must have seen its a lot more trouble than its worth. BJP might have lost their vote bank rather than gaining any this time. It might be a risky endeavor for BJP in the future.
 
hydrabadi_arab said:
Both countries are not same. India can move their assets 2000km away from border, Pakistan cant.

We are not playing game on Indian terms here. Any attack on our assets will be retaliated with disproportionate response.

Thats why retaliation 2.0 was going to be Indian economic hubs. And then even nuclear strikes.
Click to expand...
Their depth allows them to keep things away from our reach...but that's no necessarily a bad thing, it means it will take them longer to mobiles and reach us, which allows us to see them longer before they reach us. In contrast, our close proximity to them ensures a rapid response from our side, reducing our reaction time. This leads to relatively short, but intense exchanges. Time is of the essence, and how much mass you can bring down per unit time, to achieve destruction of your targets. That's where I think the Pakistani response was lacking, they took too long, and the response was too little too late. It should have been more intense, and at a more rapid pace.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 43 (members: 0, guests: 43)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top