According to Armed Conflict Location & Event Data - A aggregator and risk management non-profile LLC registered in the US that functions as a mapping and data visualisation think tank rating and tracking conflicts around the world for policy makers:
Pakistan's risk rating and vulnerability to armed conflict at national stability was improving, compare this to the domestic security and risk of armed conflict for India was
constantly concerning due to domestic security issues and regional flash-points.
Not only does India have a higher risk of internal conflict - it also poses an increasing danger to regional stability due to flashpoints:

India is involved in a non-international armed conflict on its territory with the Naxalites. The tensions with Pakistan over the status of Kashmir regularly cause armed clashes leading to an international armed conflict. Furthermore, clashes between India and China amounted to an international armed conflict in 2020.
On 9 September 2022, India and China announced their soldiers started to disengage from contested areas at the border. Notwithstanding the withdrawal of troops, the IAC is not over, as China controls about 20% of Kashmir.

============================================================
India's recent attacks in Pakistan attacks our Dams, Schools and Civilian population centres breaches her obligations to the IHL - See below;
C. Summary IHL Rules Governing International Armed ConflictThe basic principles and rules of IHL applicable to the conduct of hostilities in anIAC are set out in the 1907 Hague Regulations and the 1949 Geneva Conventionsand their 1977 Additional Protocols, and represent customary law applicable to all. The basis of the law of armed conflict is the rule of distinction. This rule obliges ‘parties to a conflict’ (in other words, the warring parties, i.e. Israel and Syria or India and Pakistan in 2013) to target only military objectives and not the civilian population, individual civilians, or civilian objects (e.g. homes, hospitals,and schools). Deliberately targeting civilians is a serious violation of IHL, as too is failing to distinguish in military operations between civilians and combatants (i.e.an indiscriminate attack), and both are war crimes under customary international law given the requisite intent (mens rea).23
============================================================
Source:
https://www.geneva-academy.ch/joomlatools-files/docman-files/The War Report 2016.pdf
============================================================
Indian State Sponsored Terrorism in Pakistan to ferment instability:

Pakistani intelligence agencies accuse Indian consulates in Kandahar and Jalalabad, Afghanistan, of providing covert arms, financial support, and training to the BLA in an
attempt to destabilize Pakistan and block Chinese influence in Balochistan.
[72] However, some analysts argue that such interference would be against Indian interests, as India, like Pakistan, also seeks to profit from Balochi oil and gas resources.
[73]
Pakistani politicians have also claimed that U.S. and British intelligence agencies are supporting the Balochi rebellion in order to sabotage a proposed oil pipeline that could undermine U.S. control of Gulf oil.
[74] The U.K. has harbored Hyrbyair Marri, an alleged BLA leader by the Pakistani government, as a refugee.
[75]
The Pakistani government launched a program in 2017 that provided compensation for militants that surrendered to authorities. In this program, the government agreed to provide compensation, jobs, education and security to members of certain banned organizations including the BLA.
[76]
In December 2023, a commander of the Baloch National Army (BNA) separatist militant group, who had surrendered himself to the Pakistani government, disclosed that India has been secretly supporting terrorist activities in Balochistan and financing separatist forces in the region.
According to Pakistani media sources, commander Sarfraz Ahmed Bungulzai made the announcement at a press conference in Quetta, the capital city of Balochistan. Bungulzai said that he thought his armed struggle was for Baloch rights, but later he realized that "India is involved in all these conspiracies."
Bungulzai mentioned a helicopter crash in 2022, in which six Pakistani army officials, including a general, were martyred. He said at the press conference that the secessionist group Baloch Raj Aajoi Sangar (BRAS) had taken responsibility for the incident at India's command.
"And after taking money from India, they shed the blood of their own Baloch," said Bungulzai, according to Pakistani news website Dawn.
Apart from the latest case pointing to India, a few years back, there was another case that indicated that India was probably supporting terrorism in Pakistan.
In March 2016, Pakistan's Inter Services Public Relations released a confessional video statement of an Indian spy agent named Kulbhushan Yadav, who was reportedly arrested red-handed earlier that month while attempting to infiltrate Pakistan from the border area.
According to an article by the Associated Press of Pakistan (APP), Yadav said in the video that he was a serving officer of the Indian Navy, and did intelligence gathering for Indian agencies under the cover name Hussein Mubarik Patel.
"I was picked up by RAW (the Research and Analysis Wing, India's alleged external intelligence agency) in 2013 end," Yadav said. "My purpose was to hold meetings with Baloch insurgents and carry out activities with their collaboration. These activities have been of [a] criminal nature, leading to the killing of or maiming of Pakistani citizens."
Multiple instances have been highlighted by Pakistan's security authorities on some international forums, illustrating how the RAW funds elements in Pakistan to spread unrest, observer Ali Abbas Ramay, a journalist with the City News Network Pakistan, told the Global Times.
"Proof of India's involvement in creating the BLA has been presented, including Yadav's confessions," Ramay said.
The clues of India's connection with terrorist forces in Pakistan could also be found in a few Indian media reports.
The Hindu, for instance, published an article in July 2019, stating "It is established that BLA (Baloch Liberation Army) commanders, in the past, had sought medical treatment in India's hospitals, often under disguise or with fake identities." Pakistan designated the BLA as a terrorist organization in 2006.
The Hindu article referred to BLA's militant commander who "was based in Delhi for at least six months in 2017," to receive "extensive treatment for kidney-related ailments." It is known that Baloch sardars "maintained warm personal ties with various Indian political figures," the article said.
Some of the related evidence has been made public. Many other concrete forms of evidence show that India backs terrorism in Pakistan, although they have not yet been released for a variety of reasons, said a source close to the situation in Balochistan.
"We have had the evidence long before," the source told the Global Times. He said that he was "100 percent" sure that India has been funding the terrorist forces in Balochistan.
============================================================
India's double standards when it comes to combating terrorism:
Some Pakistani scholars believe that India has a long history of continuous interference in Pakistan's affairs.
For example, scholar M. Ikram Rabbani wrote in his book
Comprehensive Pakistan Studies that the interference "can be traced back to the times of independence from the British rule."
In his book, Rabbani cited Subrahmaniyam, a former director of the then Indian Institute of Defence Studies, who said during a symposium in March 1971 that "what India must realize that the breakup of Pakistan is in our interest and an opportunity which will never come again."
Worse still, while supporting separatist groups to commit terrorist attacks in regions like Balochistan, India is good at taking the habitual tactic of a thief crying "stop thief" in the international community, while slinging mad at Pakistan, Pakistani and Chinese observers noted.
India employs a consistent double standard toward terrorism, said Ye Hailin, deputy director of the National Institute of International Strategy of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. "If you look at India's media and think tank reports, you will find that their descriptions of the terrorist attacks in Balochistan are completely different from those of the situation in Kashmir," Ye told the Global Times.
Ramay echoed Ye's words, saying the evidence of India's adoption of double standard in countering terrorism "is evident."
He pointed out that India has sought to tarnish Pakistan's image globally by leveling serious allegations of terrorism, aiming to deter investments and striving to include Pakistan in the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) blacklist.
The blacklist contains countries that the FATF deems to be non-cooperative in the global fight against money laundering and terrorist financing.
"China firmly opposes double standard in counterterrorism," noted Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Mao Ning at a press conference on December 27, 2023, while responding to a question asking about its comments on then-recent media reports, which said that the surrendered BNA commander disclosed that India has been secretly supporting terrorist activities in Balochistan.
"Terrorism is humanity's common enemy," Mao said. "To support and use terrorist groups and let them thrive out of one's selfish interests at the expense of international and regional security benefits no one and will only backfire."
===========================================================
Source:
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202401/1305842.shtml
===========================================================