Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[Oracle]

Any source ? Man this is serjous ?

Najam sethi mentioned at end of his program yesterday. He didn't quote any source

 

[NationalistPKDude132]

As per Najam Sethi yesterday
India may do any mis adventure

That Najam Sethi Dude literally said 2011 mein Netanyahu ne bayan diya Israel ka next target pakistan hai


Do our politicans not fact check?

Quote by Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu about Pakistan misrepresented

Viral snippet about Israeli premier talking about Pakistan is from an interview published online on 31 March 2011

www.sochfactcheck.com

You can hate on him but dont spread fake news and even our stupid politicians do it

 

[NationalistPKDude132]

That Najam Sethi Dude literally said 2011 mein Netanyahu ne bayan diya Israel ka next target pakistan hai


Do our politicans not fact check?

Quote by Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu about Pakistan misrepresented

Viral snippet about Israeli premier talking about Pakistan is from an interview published online on 31 March 2011

www.sochfactcheck.com

You can hate on him but dont spread fake news and even our stupid politicians do it

Nevermind did not listen to statement properly of his My bad here

 

[hydrabadi_arab]

Jo Balochistan hai woh Sambhal nai raha aur sistan chaiye... baaten coror ki dukaan pakoro ki.

Because of BLA terror camps in Sistan. Either Iran take actions against them instead of taking Indian money and hosting RAW or Pakistan intervene to annex Sistan.

Depend on if Iran regime fail and USA start working on balkanization.

 

[baqai]

J35 is not plug and play ghost..

PAF will have to integrate it with in eco system and with Awacs and tactics. whole strategy and practice will change with new fighter



Same thing Indian thought of RAFALE and see where it is now..

How long did it take from J-10s induction to achieving it's first combat kill, my point being is that things are made public when its appropriate while work keeps going on in the background

 

[NationalistPKDude132]

Najam sethi mentioned at end of his program yesterday. He didn't quote any source

so it means he is guessing from his fat head

 

[Oracle]

so it means he is guessing from his fat head

Well not a big fan of anchors however

He was first one to blame India for false flag operation on Indian channel ( made so much noise in India)

Guessed /Mentioned indian attack is coming.

Guessed Iran attack is coming...

So i better hear him with pinch of salt

 

[Cookie Monster]

It was designed to be limited. Otherwise the missile at Nur Khan could have fallen on GHQ if the intention was to cause real damage. I hope you know the meaning of a strike on GHQ. Or would you count it in terms of just a building destroyed with no one inside?

You have still not understood where Pakistan failed in this conflict.

It failed to strike Indian targets inspite of achieving remarkable success in the Air to Air battle. It couldn’t utilise that edge to carry out precision strikes. Firing rockets in the air aimed towards East was the only achievement.



Please don’t be a child and grow up. If you had grown up then you would have known that India has many bases and military assets at same distance or lesser distance from the border as yours. No one is asking for a proof of strike at bases near Kolkata.
Your forces tried to hit 26 bases as claimed by the ISPR. And here you are hiding behind geography.

Wouldn’t it have been better not to waste your missiles since they couldn’t do anything? That way you could have said, we didn’t try at all and had we tried we could have done the damage. Right now it is loss of face and claims of -we didn’t fire Babur and better missiles. It means that the assessment of using Fatah-I was a wrong one. Isn’t that a failure?

All square on ground to ground would take place the day you post a proof.
And we all know it ain’t coming.

How's that a failure?
On one hand u claim Indian strikes did limited damage bcuz it was designed to be limited(quote "instead of hitting Nur Khan base..India could have targeted GHQ")...
...then u turn on the hypocrisy switch so that u can perform mental gymnastics...
...and claim that Pakistan's strikes were limited bcuz Pakistan failed?
...using the same reasoning as u used for India...couldn't it be that Pakistan's strikes on India were also designed to be limited? In order to get our pound of flesh...but just enough as not to escalate into a full blown war?

So just like how India COULD have targeted GHQ and other such things...Pakistan COULD have used missiles like Babur, Shaheen, etc and strike even higher value Indian ground targets...
...instead Pakistan chose to use Fatah and YIHA types of stuff...to give a reply just enough to settle the score...
...u should stop playing at this "neutral" analysis/argument...when ur bias clearly shows even through ur should've, could've, would've types of theoretical scenarios.

 

[PK781]

i am afraid we have wasted alot of time on non hypersonic ballistic missiles. israel can attack us anytime in next couple of years. we need hypersonic glide missiles and that too in large number. as can be seen non hypersonic are easily intercepted by israel air defence?

while they may try to exert pressure via proxy, there is no way they have the balls or the resolve to actually attack Pakistan. Even the americans will think 10 times before doing that.
Pakistan will not be a soft cookie, it will shatter their teeth if they do that.
And they know that very well.

We need to stop undermining ourselves. Allah SWT is with us, and we're on the correct way, so we will always win. **** them and their dreams!

 

[F86 Saber]

Any update on Shivangi Singh?? Very strange if not.

 

[ziaulislam]

How's that a failure?
On one hand u claim Indian strikes did limited damage bcuz it was designed to be limited(quote "instead of hitting Nur Khan base..India could have targeted GHQ")...
...then u turn on the hypocrisy switch so that u can perform mental gymnastics...
...and claim that Pakistan's strikes were limited bcuz Pakistan failed?
...using the same reasoning as u used for India...couldn't it be that Pakistan's strikes on India were also designed to be limited? In order to get our pound of flesh...but just enough as not to escalate into a full blown war?

So just like how India COULD have targeted GHQ and other such things...Pakistan COULD have used missiles like Babur, Shaheen, etc and strike even higher value Indian ground targets...
...instead Pakistan chose to use Fatah and YIHA types of stuff...to give a reply just enough to settle the score...
...u should stop playing at this "neutral" analysis/argument...when ur bias clearly shows even through ur should've, could've, would've types of theoretical scenarios.

Fateh is regular artellery

Vs


Brahmos is last option india has

There is a huge difference in leader if escalation here

I think not using babur open the doors for future use id nuclear strikes as india used a nuclear capable system

 

[Samurai]

I personally think Pakistan needs to keep two things on high priority:

1) Multi-layered AD
2) Big payload, supersonic/hypersonic missiles (ground and air launched) competitor to Brahmos

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Any update on Shivangi Singh?? Very strange if not.

Probably having a bowl of curry in the deepest of india.

 

[ziaulislam]

As the Indian military continues to modernize with advanced, indigenous weapon systems and platforms, the goal of Pakistan’s denuclearisation will become increasingly easy. This would not only enhance regional stability but ultimately benefit Pakistan itself.

By the time the next conflict between India and Pakistan arises, the hypersonic variant of BrahMos, the Vishnu hypersonic cruise missile, and the Gandiva air-to-air missile will be in service. Alongside them, the Tejas MK1A and a few units of the Tejas MK2 will also be operational—equipped with hypersonic cruise missiles and the 350 km-range Air to Air Gandiva missile.
View attachment 128376

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Vkdindian1]

limited

Not limited. Just the desired damage and the display of capability to strike where India wanted.
So, don’t count building to building numbers or the cost of damage. The reason has been explained in my previous post.

couldn't it be that Pakistan's strikes on India were also designed to be limited? In order to get our pound of flesh...but just enough as not to escalate into a full blown war?

There should have been some pound of flesh to show. There was none.

The hypothesis that India’s attack at Nur Khan and other assets, were scaled down, to show just the intent, can’t be compared to Pak’s incapability to cause visible and verifiable damage to Indian installations. It is like a student who scores 90% marks and then claims that 95% was within sights, compared to a student who scores 30% but makes the same claim. Both are hypotheses but no way comparable to each other.

This is only applicable to attack on ground targets and not Air to Air engagements.

Both nations used weapons of their choice. Pakistan’s choice doesn’t seem to have done their job. The reasons quoted for this failure are juvenile and childish to say the least.

The claim that the aim was not to escalate, sounds hollow from your side. To start with, the attacks should have made some mark, to start talking of holding back or escalating.

I never claimed to be a neutral person. I am a proud Indian and have no qualms about this. I would always root for my nation, where I can.

What I do claim, is that I am not a fanboy or a bhakt. I am not the one who blindly toes just one line of thinking. I also claim to be an objective person who has the capability to criticise India if they fail anywhere.

PAF did exceptionally well in Air to Air battle. IAF failed miserably.

Pakistan failed miserably in making any impact against Indian installations is the other side of my analysis.
Both these are based on FACTS, that have come to fore and not blindness displayed by many fanboys/bhakts.