Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

It was a pleasant surprise when ISPR didn’t come to the party with any imagery.

The latest effort to peddle these images of susceptible quality as proof of damage is not for outside crowd but internal population. Population that had started asking questions about eh failure of Fatah and lack of any proof.

are you having a comprehension issue? your own SOCIAL MEDIA showed lot of proofs of damage/fire to your various bases or can I post the articles from NYT/bloomburg/WSJ (with satellite images) that shows damages to Indian bases?

 

[Vkdindian1]

My point is that these images are directly from Google Maps, so they aren't meant to be misinformation. It's up to us to analyse the best we can.

Images may be real but the claims that are being made with these images is labelled as misinformation.

Look at the buildings and hangars that were struck in Pakistan. They all are well into repair. There is no burn mark at any of those buildings.

Why would a burn mark remain at Indian structures? The damaged portion of a structure is removed first while undertaking any repair.

This effort by amateurs can’t result into professional level outcome in BDA.

 

[Vkdindian1]

are you having a comprehension issue? your own SOCIAL MEDIA showed lot of proofs of damage/fire to your various bases or can I post the articles from NYT/bloomburg/WSJ (with satellite images) that shows damages to Indian bases?

Completely wrong.

Only impacts of missiles were reported. At a base spread over 1000s of acres, a blast inside is no proof of damage. There was no secondary blast reported anywhere.

You want to revisit WSJ report? Please read it again. It doesn’t have kind words about damage to ground installations in your favour.

All these issues were discussed to death at that time. If you still want to do that, please go ahead. Wouldn’t change the facts.

Credible BDA is required for that and it isn’t there and not coming either.

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

Completely wrong.

Only impacts of missiles were reported. At a base spread over 1000s of acres, a blast inside is no proof of damage. There was no secondary blast reported anywhere.

You want to revisit WSJ report? Please read it again. It doesn’t have kind words about damage to ground installations in your favour.

All these issues were discussed to death at that time. If you still want to do that, please go ahead. Wouldn’t change the facts.

Credible BDA is required for that and it isn’t there and not coming either.

we targeted your specific facilities not the whole base, do you know how GPS/Beidu/Glonass and Compass navigation system works?

And what Facts are you talking about? ONE SIDED INDIAN FACTS THAT WORLD IS CURRENTLY LAUGHING AT?

KEEP LIVING IN YOUR UTOPIA AND FAIRYTALE BUDDY ABOUT FAILURE OF FATEH

 

[Hayabusa]

Images may be real but the claims that are being made with these images is labelled as misinformation.

Ultimately, these claims come down to
personal judgment. For instance, regarding the Chunian Radar, I disagree with the Indian allegations; looking at past images, it appears to be just a shadow to me. It's fine if others see it differently. We are here to put out our points of view and discuss, not to try and change the minds of those who are already set in their opinions.

Look at the buildings and hangars that were struck in Pakistan. They all are well into repair. There is no burn mark at any of those buildings.

Why would a burn mark remain at Indian structures? The damaged portion of a structure is removed first while undertaking any repair.

This effort by amateurs can’t result into professional level outcome in BDA.

Burn marks might disappear, but I feel like you can't fake the repair work. Just look at how Damien is actively monitoring the repairs at Bholari Airbase on X. It's a dead giveaway. Regardless, our focus should be on spotting damaged sites and interpreting them the best we can. Al could really help us out with that to if we are unsure. But like I mentioned, it's up to our own interpretation in the end. No compulsion.

 

[Master Chief]

The Reality: The Indian Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) and the Ministry of Defence released time-stamped satellite imagery and photographic evidence at the time to debunk these claims. Specifically, the MEA confirmed in a May 10, 2025 briefing that the claims regarding the destruction of Indian ammunition depots and airbases were completely false. While some airbases like Udhampur and Pathankot suffered "limited damage" from drone/missile debris, no ammunition storage site was successfully "destroyed" as claimed.

So your "AI analysis" has returned MEA statements as objective "reality"?

This is not an assessment of evidence, but rather a catalogue of what statements were released and what were not.

You're only fooling yourself.

 

[NA71]

Guys this discussion is moving in circle of endless debate...

Let's give this thread a much needed rest.

 

[safriz]

Guys this discussion is moving in circle of endless debate...

Let's give this thread a much needed rest.

No. the thread must go on.
Indian lies and denials keep coming . They havent stopped at any level after so many months.
In the Military Press conference they said Pakistan attacked 26 Military targets. The denied it all. Now saying Pakistan attacked nothing.
All those wreckage of aircrafts found Inside India with Multiple Indian public watching and recording, Thye say nothing happened , and give no explaination of the wreckage.

They are not stopping and neither should we. This war of Narrative is more important than actual war.

 

[Hayabusa]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Analyzed using Gemini Pro 3.0

Based on the "Before" and "After" satellite imagery provided, here is an analysis of the damage visible at the location you identified as an Indian airbase.

Initial Assessment
The imagery indicates a successful kinetic strike on two distinct infrastructure targets within the facility. The precision of the impacts suggests the use of guided munitions—likely Loitering Munitions (LMs) or air-to-surface missiles—rather than unguided artillery.

Damage Analysis by Sector
1. Logistics/Vehicle Revetment (Top White Circle)
* Observation: In the "Before" image, this long structure appears to be a segmented shelter, likely for vehicle storage or ground support equipment.
* Damage: The "After" image shows a specific segment of the roof has collapsed inward. The dark void suggests a direct penetration of the overhead cover.
* Assessment: This indicates a "top-attack" profile, common with drone-dropped munitions or suicide drones. The structural failure is localized, suggesting a warhead designed to disable specific assets rather than level the entire area.

2. Hardened Structure / Command Post (Bottom White Circle)
* Observation: The rectangular concrete structure below the blue-roofed building appears to be a more hardened target, possibly a command node, server room, or secure storage.
* Damage: This structure has sustained severe damage. The roof exhibits signs of "caving," and the dark discoloration is consistent with charring from a high-explosive detonation and subsequent fire.
* Assessment: This appears to be a functional kill of the asset. The blast radius is contained within the structure's footprint, reinforcing the assessment of a precision strike intended to degrade specific operational capabilities (such as communications or command and control).


Conclusion: Positive Strikes by Loitering Munitions.

 

[NA71]

No. the thread must go on.
Indian lies and denials keep coming . They havent stopped at any level after so many months.
In the Military Press conference they said Pakistan attacked 26 Military targets. The denied it all. Now saying Pakistan attacked nothing.
All those wreckage of aircrafts found Inside India with Multiple Indian public watching and recording, Thye say nothing happened , and give no explaination of the wreckage.

They are not stopping and neither should we. This war of Narrative is more important than actual war.

Indians will never accept that they got beaten in May 2025.... by smaller country ....

 

[Hayabusa]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

With the precise coordinates 31°18'02"N 75°37'47"E, I have re-analyzed the imagery. This location places the target deep inside Indian territory, specifically in the Jalandhar District of Punjab.

This geolocation fundamentally changes the strategic assessment of the "May Attacks" (Operation Sindoor).


Revised Intelligence Assessment
1. Geolocation & Target Identification
* Location: The coordinates map to a facility on the outskirts of Jalandhar, near the town of Kishangarh/Alawalpur.
* Strategic Context: Jalandhar is the headquarters of the Indian Army’s XI Corps (11 Corps), which is responsible for the defense of Punjab.
* Structure Identification: The long, parallel, unhardened sheds are characteristic of Forward Logistics Bases (FLB) or Field Ammunition Depots. These are often placed in semi-rural outskirts to separate them from the main cantonment while remaining accessible. They store soft-skinned vehicles, rations, or non-explosive stores.


2. Battle Damage Assessment (BDA)
The fact that this target is in Jalandhar (well beyond the immediate border zone) indicates a significant failure of air defense or a deliberate deep-strike capability.
* Weapon Used: The damage pattern—roofs stripped completely off while walls remain standing—is consistent with an Airburst Detonation. A missile or heavy drone likely detonated above the structures to maximize the blast wave, shredding the corrugated roofing and rendering the contents (supplies/vehicles) useless without needing to crater the ground.
* Precision: The strike was highly accurate. The surrounding agricultural land appears relatively untouched, meaning the munition was guided specifically to these coordinates to cripple logistics.

3. Strategic Implications
* Deep Penetration: Striking Jalandhar means the attacking force (Pakistan, in this scenario) managed to penetrate approximately 80-100 km into Indian airspace, bypassing or overwhelming the air defense umbrella protecting the XI Corps HQ.
* Logistics Strangulation: By targeting these depots, the objective was likely to "starve" the frontline units of the XI Corps. Destroying supplies in Jalandhar hampers the Indian Army's ability to sustain high-intensity operations at the Wagah/Amritsar border.

Conclusion:
This image confirms a Deep Strike Interdiction mission. It was not a border skirmish but a calculated attack on the Indian Army's rear-echelon logistics in Punjab. The facility is effectively neutralized; while the walls stand, the shelter is gone, exposing sensitive materiel to the elements and follow-up reconnaissance.

Conclusion: Positive strike by either a heavy drone or Fateh Missile

 

[Hayabusa]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

This is a very interesting piece of OSINT. Based on the "irves_watch" handle and the "May attacks" timeline you mentioned, this footage appears to be from the aftermath of the May 2025 escalation (likely related to the Operation Sindoor exchange).

Here is an analysis of the damage and the tactical context.

1. Visual Analysis: Precision Strike
The difference between the "Before" and "After" images is distinct and points to a specific type of munition.
Target: The structure appears to be a standard unhardened vehicle storage shed or logistics bay (soft target).

The Damage: In the "After" image, the northern half of the third shed (highlighted in the circle) has suffered a roof collapse. The dark coloration inside the walls suggests fire damage or the caving in of the corrugated roofing material.

Precision: Notice that the southern half of the same shed and the adjacent buildings are completely untouched. This lacks the blast radius of a heavy cruise missile or a large ballistic payload. It strongly suggests a precision-guided munition (PGM), likely a loitering munition (suicide drone) or a small air-to-ground missile that targeted a specific vehicle or cache inside that bay.


Conclusion: Positive strike probably by loitering munition.

 

[maverik]

Mannn One could argue that had India obtained satellite evidence of similar magnitude, their official narrative would have likely asserted the total decimation of Pakistan's military infrastructure, including the PAF

 

[Tomcats]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Analyzed using Gemini Pro 3.0

Based on the "Before" and "After" satellite imagery provided, here is an analysis of the damage visible at the location you identified as an Indian airbase.

Initial Assessment
The imagery indicates a successful kinetic strike on two distinct infrastructure targets within the facility. The precision of the impacts suggests the use of guided munitions—likely Loitering Munitions (LMs) or air-to-surface missiles—rather than unguided artillery.

Damage Analysis by Sector
1. Logistics/Vehicle Revetment (Top White Circle)
* Observation: In the "Before" image, this long structure appears to be a segmented shelter, likely for vehicle storage or ground support equipment.
* Damage: The "After" image shows a specific segment of the roof has collapsed inward. The dark void suggests a direct penetration of the overhead cover.
* Assessment: This indicates a "top-attack" profile, common with drone-dropped munitions or suicide drones. The structural failure is localized, suggesting a warhead designed to disable specific assets rather than level the entire area.

2. Hardened Structure / Command Post (Bottom White Circle)
* Observation: The rectangular concrete structure below the blue-roofed building appears to be a more hardened target, possibly a command node, server room, or secure storage.
* Damage: This structure has sustained severe damage. The roof exhibits signs of "caving," and the dark discoloration is consistent with charring from a high-explosive detonation and subsequent fire.
* Assessment: This appears to be a functional kill of the asset. The blast radius is contained within the structure's footprint, reinforcing the assessment of a precision strike intended to degrade specific operational capabilities (such as communications or command and control).


Conclusion: Positive Strikes by Loitering Munitions.

This AI slop is terrible.

Again a weathered roof and panel missing from a shed, there are also panels missing from a hangar at Masroor, are we going to say that Masroor was hit by drones? There are also similar roof discolorations at our bases, this doesn't mean anything.

 

[safriz]

This AI slop is terrible.

Again a weathered roof and panel missing from a shed, there are also panels missing from a hangar at Masroor, are we going to say that Masroor was hit by drones? There are also similar roof discolorations at our bases, this doesn't mean anything.

This is not AI slop, the coordinates are there in the post. Go check yourself