Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[RescueRanger]

Indication of the presence of 5th Battalion, Assam Regiment in the area. (Maybe 1st Company?)

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

They bought 1000 of these in 2023.

 

[RescueRanger]

All Pakistani members are strongly requested to abide by this notification effective immediately:

If you are a social media user/content creator - pass this message along... Do your part to help keep Pakistan safe for enemies both foreign and domestic.

 

[Be dazzled]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Sultan Baybars]

If India attacks Pakistan, the Shikh population should take this chance to declare independancy.

Shikh deserve a own country (offcourse in East-Punjab and Himachal Pradesh).

Free Khalistan!

 

[That_Guy]

India’s appetite for casualties is FAR less, I mean literally 10,000% less than Pakistan.

Indian public will lose their appetite for war the moment PAF starts raiding Delhi, Mumbai, etc.

Pakistani public has known nothing but war for the last 50 years.

That's an assumption.

History shows that violence actually increases violence. Dead bodies don't deter populations, it increases anger and resentment.

 

[Sainthood 2.0]

Let India attack first, no preemptive strikes from our end
Cause if it turns hot, a lot more allied countries would be willing to supply us as the defending side rather than if we are perceived as the attacking one.

Also, Pakistan should use the reversal of IWT to motivate people, as if a war is imposed, then you are fighting for Allah and water, or you'll die of thirst.
Either water or death.
Every sect, ethnicity, and political party would put aside their differences and go all in like never before.
Hell, if we had a competent foreign office, we'd still be playing that card right now.

 

[Sainthood 2.0]

India’s appetite for casualties is FAR less, I mean literally 10,000% less than Pakistan.

Indian public will lose their appetite for war the moment PAF starts raiding Delhi, Mumbai, etc.

Pakistani public has known nothing b shut war for the last 50 years.

When things get real, they would be willing to churn out millions upon millions of casualties. Don't go into a war with false assumptions.

 

[PakistanLVR]

India’s appetite for casualties is FAR less, I mean literally 10,000% less than Pakistan.

Indian public will lose their appetite for war the moment PAF starts raiding Delhi, Mumbai, etc.

Pakistani public has known nothing but war for the last 50 years.

No one willingly wants to die, but you are overlooking the fact that non-Islamic nations due to their weak spiritual beliefs rely on disinformation, propaganda, and straight up lies to motivate their people to fight enemies and it works. Look at their blood lust right now. Their government can easily find many willing fools to come to the front line to fight just by simply asking their media talking mouthpieces to encourage more hatred and lies that they are winning the notional war and that will be all.

I hope the Pakistan High Command takes out their media houses during the war as its a potent weapon to influence their population motivation and desire to fight.

More and more I understand the modern rule of war and why the US and Israel also take out journalists. Its not to hide their war crimes, but to discourage any morale and motivation for the enemy to rally his population to fight and resist!
@That_Guy @Meengla @PakFactor

 

[Vikramaditya1]

Your concern for Muslims is noted.
How about letting them have a vote on who they want to be governed by? Show your love bro? What you scared of. Be brave be bold. Your mighty - you offer prosperity - you offer success - Pakistan has little to offer. Why would they choose those rotten Pakistanis?
Let them decide - and let’s accept their choice eh? Imagine that. I for one would be happy with whatever they choose - would you?

There was an election in October 63% people came out to vote and elect their government. Omar Abdullah government is ruling now. Here's the voting turnout if you want to check.

Overall, 63.88 % turnout recorded in J&K Assembly Elections

In continuation of ECI’s two press notes no. 142 & 143 dated 01.10.2024, Voter turnout of 69.69% has

pib.gov.in

That's the choice they have. They can also vote for Central Elections, has 5 seats.
India don't allow cessation from the Union. When we elect a government that runs based on giving independence to any region in India and they campaign for it and wins election they can have it. That's how democracy works. We are the tax payers we decide what the government should do.

 

[Vikramaditya1]

This is pure cope on your part. The Americans and Musharraf went on a crusade against all militant groups operating from within Pakistan over the last 20 years. All attacks, if not false flags, are the result of Indian war crimes radicalizing locals.

Nevertheless, if you are foolish enough start a war, we will be the ones to end it — and perhaps, end India in the process.

They why did the UNSC designated a bunch of Pakistanis as terrorists. If Musharaff crusaded all militant groups and there is none. Is it a mistake that UNSC which China could've easily vetoed, allow 'innocent Pakistanis' to be declared as terrorists? Don't short circuit now.

 

[Yasser76]

They why did the UNSC designated a bunch of Pakistanis as terrorists. If Musharaff crusaded all militant groups and there is none. Is it a mistake that UNSC which China could've easily vetoed, allow 'innocent Pakistanis' to be declared as terrorists? Don't short circuit now.

Easy, Modi was banned from visiting the US as he was implicated in mass murders. Glass houses old boy, glass houses....

 

[PakistanLVR]

Easy, Modi was banned from visiting the US as he was implicated in mass murders. Glass houses old boy, glass houses....

Yup - banned in 2005 by President Bush!

Technical Difficulties

 

[Ali_Baba]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[arjunk]

That's an assumption.

History shows that violence actually increases violence. Dead bodies don't deter populations, it increases anger and resentment.

it’s a reasonable assumption — if you don’t have time to delve into military history you’ll probably soon see why yourself.

 

[That_Guy]

it’s a reasonable assumption — if you don’t have time to delve into military history you’ll probably soon see why yourself.

Military history actually proves my point. Bombing cities doesn't deter the population, it makes them angry. A parent with a dead child, a child with a dead parent, they will run to recruitment centers to try and seek revenge.

That's how it works.