Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

That’s good but it shows Pakistani cities and Pakistani children are easy targets

If the war continued, indian cities and children would have become even easier targets, which is why the indians agreed to the ceasefire. They knew it too.

 

[koolio]

It gives India time to regroup and initiate more strikes after the pause, remember these Hindutvas are blood thirsty monsters, thier main objectives are not achieved.

 

[brazensword]

India will try again. They will go back see what worked and what didn’t. Unless the rabid dog Modi gets booted out. So really important to build a strong economy and keep boosting defence capability.

US and Israel will now be sharing improved plans with Laindia for tackling Pakistan the next engagement.

Restraint © Doctrine is not designed for a fluid battlespace with madmen such as Modi at the helm.

 

[CombatCorner]

Pakistan

This doesn't just seem right

Congratulations to PAF though

If you minus the PAF - this doesn't look good on Pakistan

So much for maturity/restraint/time place of choosing

The land army of Pakistan was taken for a ride by India in this whole episode.

Might write a write up soon on this...

And American journalists are now reporting that after Pakistani missiles rained on India and caused extensive damage , India had no choice but to agree for ceasefire

 

[Mirzali Khan]

Off topic but kind of related. Establishment now needs to purge the political elements who they have placed in positions of power. This sensitive time showed us who is with Pakistan and who is not. Maryam and nawaz need to be put in the trash bin of history. Permanently.

That’s never going to happen lol

 

[r3alist]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Kambojaric]

IF This is true, this is very good for Pakistan.

This goes against Indias position i.e. no third party should be involved in questions involving Kashmir. Something Pakistan always calls for. Rather India insists all disputes should be resolved bilaterally.

Third party involvement certainly seems like a Pakistani victory.

 

[Mustang125]

If the war continued, indian cities and children would have become even easier targets, which is why the indians agreed to the ceasefire. They knew it too.

This! Indians still have nightmares about the Bombay attacks, now imagine a few missiles being dropped their from Pakistan as an official military strike!

 

[Mustang125]

That’s never going to happen lol

Sadly yes bro! Dil ko sukoon de raha tha lol

 

[r3alist]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[hyperman]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Submarine launch capacity needs to be developed. More vectors of attack, right now they have Pakistan pinned on one side in a small operating area, while they have strategic depth to their east.

All air traffic over Pakistan was stopped but the Airport in Delhi was operating and there was only a partial shutdown on their western border.

 

[Pakistan First]

IF Pakistan hit nothing meaningful then the indians would not be agreeing to a ceasefire. The damage they were suffering was unsustainable. indians were claiming at the start of the conflict that they will do to Pakistan what the israelis did to the Gazans.

If you believe indians or the indian media then you also belive that india can beat both Pakistan and China..........

I have to totally disagree with you! Its not even a debate. Pakistan did a strike that was symbolic and designed for non-escalation. Something which we had to do right after their first attack on day-1 But we showed restrained and they kept doing attacks after attacks. These targets were selected long ago, as we knew india will attack. We must had to respond immediately. But our govt / PMLN and their associated media designed a specific narrative that we should only be defensive and if we retaliate then we will be used in Modi's "trap". They started calling interception of indian drone attacks as our "retaliation" and emboldened india to hit us more and more.

Now, you have the names of airstrips that we attacked. You can go at google satellite maps now. Check for yourself how close they are to our borders and secondly see for yourself that even in archive satellite imargry there is no assets deployed on those airbases. You seriously think india will deploy any significant assets on those bases ? Especially when they escalated first by attacking our major airbases, they obviously anticipated our attack and would already have remaining every bit of piece from these FOBs. Remember we got hammered for 4 days on our major cities and on our major airbases. By all honesty, india crossed many redlines and we didn't crossed any and responded to none.

Our only success came from airforce in first 10 mins of the conflict when they downed 5 attackers. Rest of whole of conflict we couldn't even decide when we were continuously hammered and violated.

So, our attack was mild in relation to what india did, something to cheer us up that's all. We need serious introspection on our leadership crisis that emboldened india at first place. On top, Imagine IWT (our waters and our rivers already taken by india).

 

[NGAD IS THE BEST]

It gives India time to regroup and initiate more strikes after the pause, remember these Hindutvas are blood thirsty monsters, thier main objectives are not achieved.

We also have time to regroup and have time to replace expanded SAMs SSMs with new one

 

[brazensword]

This goes against Indias position i.e. no third party should be involved in questions involving Kashmir. Something Pakistan always calls for. Rather India insists all disputes should be resolved bilaterally.

Third party involvement certainly seems like a Pakistani victory.

You're forgetting this is Laindia, they can always conjure up a false flag and resume hostilities.

 

[Anaa]

Ceasefire will not hold.

The only lasting solution to this war is plebiscite in Kashmir.

Our kashmiri leadership succumbed the umpteenth time . Anyways a common Kashmiri is fed up playing to the gallery of isb and Delhi under the barrel for a gun why not just vacate that area and don't impose our respective national egos upon the locals ? I mean kashmir was still a state pre 47