Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you calling your own MOD brief a lie. I mean we do know they lie but do you think they are a liar when to named the places hit and acknowledged equipment damage?When the operations were On, the. This map would have a lot a relevance and no proof was expected.
As the ceasefire is declared it’s time for corroborating these claims, Pakistan has to come out with some proofs like IAF did.
Not a very popular demand but an essential one for sake of credibility.
may be, we are sub human and you are some advanced human speciesLaunching an attack and achieving success are two different aspects.
IAF claimed that Pakistan launched attacks on many bases but also said that these failed due to kinetic action.
That is always possible as also claimed by Paksiatn against Indian attacks.
Corroboration of these claims by definitive proof is required. And there is no reason to shy away from it as Paksiatn has gone on to provide evidence for radio based kills.
What Paksiatn used and what not and for what reason is completely different aspect.
Long term use of cow cola, hinders renal function, which results in dangerous levels of toxins being retained, and cerebral function severely compromised.What do you guys make of Indian claims of successfully attacking Pakistani nuclear bases (assets) and subsequent earthquakes of 4.0 and 5.7 that were registered in different locations in Pakistan?
atom (the last sub particle) has a depth.
They had acknowledged “equipment damage” which means a lot when extracted from the ones who have yet to acknowledge multiple fighter loss for which there are visual proof’s everywhere.Launching an attack and achieving success are two different aspects.
IAF claimed that Pakistan launched attacks on many bases but also said that these failed due to kinetic action.
That is always possible as also claimed by Paksiatn against Indian attacks.
Corroboration of these claims by definitive proof is required. And there is no reason to shy away from it as Paksiatn has gone on to provide evidence for radio based kills.
What Paksiatn used and what not and for what reason is completely different aspect.
@RescueRanger @Oscar @Panzerkiel Do you guys have any idea why didn't we use our own cruise missiles, Babur and Ra'ad?
A very "mysterious" PDF member let us know after 02-27 that JF-17 Blk2s were equipped with Pl-15s and bunker busters....Just finished watching ISPR news conference, 2 vwry important thing that were told 1. Brahmose interception was mostly done by soft kill ! I mean i didnt knw that is even possible. 2 rafael was down by JF 17 block 2 and 3 (what i gather is that means both are pl15 equipped)
and they used B 21 raider for that strike, because, such a strike not possible with cruise missilesWhat do you guys make of Indian claims of successfully attacking Pakistani nuclear bases (assets) and subsequent earthquakes of 4.0 and 5.7 that were registered in different locations in Pakistan?
I have learned a rule whenever Indo Pak stuff happens wait a month usually by then you know half the truth. Till then chill and enjoy.Launching an attack and achieving success are two different aspects.
IAF claimed that Pakistan launched attacks on many bases but also said that these failed due to kinetic action.
That is always possible as also claimed by Paksiatn against Indian attacks.
Corroboration of these claims by definitive proof is required. And there is no reason to shy away from it as Paksiatn has gone on to provide evidence for radio based kills.
What Paksiatn used and what not and for what reason is completely different aspect.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.