Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

Ali_Baba said:
Lol - she is always up for a payday! Not sure what her views on Pakistan are in this video.
Click to expand...
Despite her clear tilt towards India, she did refute Indian claims when pressed by Karan to reply to Indian point of view of not losing aircrafts etc..

But I am stuck on one point:

While referring to attack on Jafar Express in Balochistan she says, "..and I am not criticizing Indian govt. for engaging in sub-conventational conflicts, actucally sub-conventional conclicts is a part of full spectrum deterence, India should be doing it".

Hellloooooooooo??? Indian sponsorship of cross-border terrorism (which actually might have lead to the latest attach in India, in her words) is fine with you and at the same time you want that there are no attacks in India? How does that work?
 
Pakistan needs a long range strike aircraft like J-16/F-15/Eurofighter with long range A2G weapon in high supersonic or hypersonic domain. We need to hit Ambala, Halwara, Briley, Delhi, Kanpur, Ghaziabad etc. India can happily sustain damages to bordering cantonments (we haven't been able to even hit them properly; no BDA means no damage caused) ... We need a weapon in KD-20/20A category; problem is these are ~9m long missiles can't be carried on any fighter, not even J-16s. But we may able to integrate a pair on Sea Sultan once it gets inducted. 2nd Option is to increase the range of CM-400 to 600-800 KM. To be able to hit targets like this Ballistic Missile Launch / Ballistic Missile Defence Site with key radar station near Delhi

1747319611152.png

Or their Green Pine / Sword Fish radars which forms their backbone of ADS. These radars track Ballistic Missile for Endo-atmospheric interceptions.

1747319839954.png

Or such missile / warhead storage sites

1747320083049.png

Chilling unit and related duct work is visible. Temperature being maintained inside the storage bunker. Site is located near Delhi/Faridabad.

Endanger all such sites located deep inside India and you will have your deterrence. Single Engine fighters like J-10C and limited range and warhead missiles like F1 and F2 are not going to provide you conventional deterrence. Dilemma has been exposed already in recent round.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
coffee_cup said:
It is a miracle, that Sri Lanka is not on the list of those hostile countries yet, given how Indian sponsored terrorists unleashed hell on Sri Lankan civilians for decades by bombing their schools, hospitals, funerals.
Click to expand...
They r unable to rn...
...economically and militarily not able to stand up to India. Politically too kind of in a situation where Bangladesh was not too long ago. Depending on who comes to power...some of them have a tilt towards India(idk if it's bcuz of money and bribes).
 
coffee_cup said:
While referring to attack on Jafar Express in Balochistan she says, "..and I am not criticizing Indian govt. for engaging in sub-conventational conflicts, actucally sub-conventional conclicts is a part of full spectrum deterence, India should be doing it".
Hellloooooooooo??? Indian sponsorship of cross-border terrorism (which actually might have lead to the latest attach in India, in her words) is fine with you and at the same time you want that there are no attacks in India? How does that work?
Click to expand...

Because, as I said above, Christine Fair is definitely pro India.
Such a low for her position at her university and for being called as foremost analyst into so many South Asian related matters.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 108 (members: 0, guests: 108)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top