Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
I don't know if she hates Pakistan. But what's clear is that she hates Indian lies and then she ruthlessly pummels them for lying so much shamelessly.

As time went on she got sick of their lying. No one in the west would tolerate that level of delusion.

They keep abusing their Muslim citizens. Insecurity has reached record levels amongst hinduvita.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Pakistan military vows ‘brutal’ response to any Indian ceasefire violation


BR Web Desk
May 15, 2025

151828259dbcc8e.png


In an exclusive interview with Sky News, Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), delivered a blunt message to India: “Anyone who tries to violate our territory and integrity and sovereignty, our response will be brutal.”

His remarks came just four days after India and Pakistan reaffirmed their truce along the Line of Control (LoC).

The military spokesman cautioned that any major escalation between India and Pakistan would be catastrophic for both sides.

“If India thinks that it can carve out a space for war between India and Pakistan, it is actually a recipe for carving out mutual destruction,” he said.

Gen. Chaudhry argued that the international community, particularly the U.S., recognizes the dangers of unchecked aggression.

“Any sane player like the USA understands this absurdity and what the Indians are trying to do here,” he added, suggesting that India’s recent posturing risks destabilizing the region.

The ISPR chief’s warning follows a combative speech by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who dismissed concerns over nuclear escalation.

Earlier this week, Modi declared that India would not “bow to nuclear blackmail” by Pakistan and asserted that the recent clashes had set a “new normal” in how Delhi responds to alleged terrorist threats.

“We will no longer differentiate between terrorists and the government that supports them,” Modi said, signaling a hardened stance against Islamabad.
 
when i tell that, people ask for sources.
Everything does need sources, after all. All we can see is the US trampling over India nonstop, no talk from anyone about the US covertly or overtly supplying India, no images, flight records or sources. If that's the case then show something so we can look at and agree.
 

US’ offer for Kashmir resolution

Editorials
May 15, 2025

Following the cessation of Pak-India hostilities, thanks to US and some regional players’ intervention, the spotlight has turned to the core issue of conflict between the two nuclear-armed states: Kashmir.

The sudden incursions India launched on the night of May 7-8 deep inside Pakistan accusing it of involvement in the Pahalgam terrorist attack have ended badly for it. The Modi government had initiated the conflict, confident of its superiority in terms of conventional forces and modern weapons system it had acquired from various countries.

The ensuing events demonstrated that weapons technologies, the kind supplied to Pakistan by China, had changed the nature of conflict, compelling India to seek the US’ help to secure a ceasefire.**

The ceasefire along the Line of Control in Kashmir and the international border came into effect after what President Trump described as a long “night of negotiations” facilitated by Washington. He has since evinced interest in playing an active role for the resolution of the Kashmir issue.

In a post on his Truth Social platform he said, “I will work with both of you to see if, after a ‘thousand years’ a solution can be found regarding Kashmir.” For its part, Pakistan immediately welcomed the US President’s remarks with the Foreign Office expressing appreciation for his “willingness” to support efforts, it said, aimed at the resolution of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute — a longstanding issue that has serious implications for peace and security in South Asia and beyond.

Although India has yet to react, its enduring position has been that Kashmir is a bilateral issue. For Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s far-right Hindu nationalist government, which thrives on anti-Pakistan hate rhetoric, if not war hysteria, that would be a big letdown though not easy to reject.

Unlike in the case of Ukraine, rather than acting as a peace broker, Washington can nudge the two countries towards back-channel diplomacy, leading at some point to formal result-oriented talks.

It is about time New Delhi realised the folly of its policies. Illegal revocation of the disputed region’s autonomy coupled with relentless repression has not reduced the intensity of the freedom movement.

And the attempt to create a ‘New Normal’ through cross-border air strikes into Pakistan has brought it nothing but humiliation and embarrassment. It would be wise therefore to try to find a solution of the Kashmir issue which is acceptable to the Kashmiri people.

In fact, back in 2001, Gen Pervez Musharraf tried to turn a new leaf in relations with India by offering an ‘out of box’ Kashmir resolution, and found a receptive partner in the then BJP prime minister Atal Behari Vajpayee, though to see it scuppered by hawks in his party.

Later, Congress party prime minister Dr Manmohan Singh took the same path but failed to make progress, this time due to some extraneous developments in this country. One can only hope that the recipe for peaceful coexistence still has takers in New Delhi.

Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top