speedgame349
Registered Member
Sigh.... i wish ours did the same aswellYes it is delusional. Indian military works completely under civil leadership.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sigh.... i wish ours did the same aswellYes it is delusional. Indian military works completely under civil leadership.
False.indian strike was a missed shot ...Pakistan air force again showed that the target was locked and it was forced to hit a different point.
clear?
I dare to differ.Dictator deserves it.
While i dont like Rahul Gandhi, solving the Kashmir issue under leadership of Congress is much easier then the Hindutvas at BJP
balakot 2019 ki baat ho rahi hyHe surely has a point tbh. We could have done a bit better in defending our airbases.
But AVM aurangzeb mentioned they were sending 100s of missiles towards our bases. So if we do the math atleast 85% of them were jammed, shot or overshot
oh my mistakebalakot 2019 ki baat ho rahi hy
Except Bholari all of the damage to our airbases were minorFalse.
Most targets in Pakistan were hit hard. Seminaries on 6th night and bases on 9th night / 10th morning.
India lost multiple jets.
Thats what is clear.
You are trying to twist what I said and what the facts are in the context of IAF and CDS Chiefs statements.This is false. IAF chief had made some very public statement about HAL and its inability to deliver on camera earlier in the past as well. He has always been very dissatisfied with Indian industry inability to meet the agreed and signed contracts. Nothing new.
Emergency purchase route and money approved is a direct consequence of this.
Bholari was because ceasefire had already happened and accepted by both sides.Except Bholari all of the damage to our airbases were minor
But we must improve our AD for sure.
The truth always comes out later (how much time it takes is yet to be decided) but it never remains hidden. Eventually it comes out.If India shows bases etc then Pakistan and Pakistani will say "Why is India showing the bases? This is the evidence there must be some major damage and this is a lousy PR attempt to hide it". Remember when S-400 was present in the background of Modi's pictures everyone here was talking about its radars and mere presence of S-400 as a propaganda piece and evidence of destruction of S-400.
So, no, its futile to even attempt convincing Pakistanis for lack of damage in Indian military installations.
This is especially true now because now the claim from Pakistan will be that there was damage and India has repaired it and thats why these pictures / videos are being released.
One can not please one's enemy. And its only Pakistan that is claiming major damage to bases and AD system like S-400. Rest of the world does not care or has seen satellite images taken by likes of Maxxor. NY Times and WaPo has already written enough. Even likes of Stimson Center, which are usually anti India have written pieces admitting that no significant damage has been seen in Indian bases.
So whom India will try to convince? Pakistan? That is NEVER going to happen, no matter how much evidence India will give.
I mean this is Balakot all over again. Only roles have been reversed. Pakistan did not give access to Balakot sites to anyone for long time and Indians were weaving all sort of yarn while satellite evidence has shown that none of those sites were hit. Only this time it is pakistani weaving all sorts of yarn about hits on Indian bases.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.