Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

Mighty_Dragon_Strike said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.




dololo dwellers
Click to expand...

Its not delusion - you have to understand their mentality.

Saale apni maa ko bazaar mein baich dein gein magar ye kabhi nahin maan sakte ke inki hi “des” ke jaise log koi kaam behtar kar gaye.

Abay ye apnon hi ki taang katne lagtay hain agar koi Indian Indian ko hire karay aur woh ziada acha kar ke promote hojaye. Tu ye Pakistani ko khaaq kabhi tasleem karien ge?

Qayamat ajayi gi - ye kuttay ki dum nahin sudhray gi - saali umar guzar gayi inn forums pe in see tu tu mein mein karke - ye bc hi nahin hain mun lagne ke.

Ache log hain - bohat hain - har jaga pe - baqi ko ignore maro aur bas hasso un par magar un ke zehr ko samjho aur tayari rakho.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



this osint is saying, it is regular ... but needs more substantiation
 
Oscar said:
Wrong
Brahmos
Scalp
Rampage

Murid - ancillary hangar - had a small tow cart
Skardu was scalp ( because Brahmos turns like a train ) but hit the side and threw debris on taxiway

Sargodha was a new system IAF has and it is impressive - but runway was operational in a few hours with flight ops never interrupted

Kirana hills is storage so front road was hit by something - but nothing impacted operationally compared to claims of “Pakistan’s nuclear deterrent lost” - the nuclear deterrent is spread out to every grid line in Pakistan with redundancy.

Jacobabad was a taxiway and an old building from British times - still fighting the angrej! Good for you.

Bholari was the ONLY true operational hit and loss - hangar with minor damage to asset and loss of life after blast frag warhead sent pieces onto staff working on floor.

And no
It wasn’t 15 systems
It was quite a few launched - of which even Brahmos 3 out of 5 were intercepted.

Scalp was purely Rafales flying nap of the earth - launching some 100k behind Indian border because they did not want to be caught - and heading back.

The same with Rampage except for one apparently (credit where credit due) brave strike package that did a textbook streak to altitude to launch the Sargodha weapon.

Everywhere else the entire airspace for 150km on Indian side was “sanitized” for PAF operations from 1000ft up.

Same reason why the JF-17 that went after S-400 encountered only SAM launches - IAF was nowhere to be found.
Click to expand...
Also remind him why some of Indian missiles ended up in Afghanistan.
 
Too much focus on Rafale etc. What about the LoC ? I heard Pakistan had responded strongly and hundreds of Indian troops were dead. It was a factor in India seeking an end to the conflict. Do we have confirmation of that?
 
Mighty_Dragon_Strike said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



angry indian intellectual class
Click to expand...


"Saaar, we are a 4 trillion daallar acanamy. We don't care about the loss of Su-30 MKI, Rafale and Mirage fighters. This is paacket money, saaaar!"
 
Vkdindian1 said:
It wasn’t. There was no plan to cross to that side.
That has been accepted. PAF did a good job and created a surprise for IAF.
I disagree with the term stalemate. Stalemate is considered in a bigger conflict. This conflict was like a badminton match. The military exchanges were like that of a shuttle cock. One by one in a calibrated manner to not let it go out of hand.

It ended with both sides in possession of a narrative to spin.

The initiative was with India and Pakistan just reacted. The way things panned out, it was very clear that no side wanted a full war. If India wanted war then it would have escalated it. Even the weapons used by India were very calibrated and even the targets engaged were measured in quantity across the entire country. There was no attempt to fully degrade any sect of your defences.

So, full war was neither desired nor attempted.
Click to expand...
If you and your people genuinely stand by this bona fide pile of you know what, then sir, you are mentally weak and not cut out for a war. Pakistan - we are told - crossed a red line, yet here you are accepting a brief "badminton match" as comeuppance for the supposedly spilled sindoor.

However, I know you are bluffing. You don't believe a single word of what you just wrote and you have wholly altered the Indian narrative to suit what is construed as a military defeat for India.

Pretty shameful, my dear cousin from across the eastern border.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 70 (members: 2, guests: 68)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top