Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

Please cope harder about F16s, JF17s, J10Cs, and other aircrafts lost by India.
 
Olympus81 said:
The Sunday Guardian is an Indian Sunday newspaper, founded by journalist and politician M. J. Akbar. It is owned by iTV Network, which also runs the India News and NewsX channels.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sunday_Guardian#cite_note-1"><span>[</span>1<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sunday_Guardian#cite_note-2"><span>[</span>2<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sunday_Guardian#cite_note-3"><span>[</span>3<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sunday_Guardian#cite_note-4"><span>[</span>4<span>]</span></a>It was launched on 31 January 2010 from New Delhi and is printed in New Delhi, Mumbai and Chandigarh.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sunday_Guardian#cite_note-afaqs-5"><span>[</span>5<span>]</span></a><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sunday_Guardian#cite_note-6"><span>[</span>6<span>]</span></a> The 40-page newspaper is divided into two sections of 20 pages each: The Sunday Guardian and Guardian 20.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sunday_Guardian#cite_note-afaqs-5"><span>[</span>5<span>]</span></a> Together, they offer a mix of news, investigation, opinion, entertainment, lifestyle and issues of human interest.<a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sunday_Guardian#cite_note-7"><span>[</span>7<span>]</span></a>

en.m.wikipedia.org

The Sunday Guardian - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org en.m.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...
I don't believe on any sources so I deleted by myself.

I don't believe on any false claims made by both.... I am not a person who enjoyed on untruthworty news
 
Raj-Hindustani said:

Pak bases with US F-16 among targets hit by India, show documents​

Click to expand...
This report is likely to be disowned as motivated and malicious with an agenda.

IAF did come out with names of places struck by them but the strikes were called a failure by the other side claiming that only minor damage was caused.

Later on the independent analysis with satellite based BDA revealed that the damage was indeed done. Even then, the exact nature of the damage would only be known to PAK military.

These MES tenders may not be exactly based on the damage caused and it could also be to upgrade few facilities in the light of this skirmish. But, some of those could be due to strikes by India.
None of the facilities mentioned in these tenders were accepted as being damaged by Pakistan.
 
Vkdindian1 said:
This report is likely to be disowned as motivated and malicious with an agenda.

IAF did come out with names of places struck by them but the strikes were called a failure by the other side claiming that only minor damage was caused.

Later on the independent analysis with satellite based BDA revealed that the damage was indeed done. Even then, the exact nature of the damage would only be known to PAK military.

These MES tenders may not be exactly based on the damage caused and it could also be to upgrade few facilities in the light of this skirmish. But, some of those could be due to strikes by India.
None of the facilities mentioned in these tenders were accepted as being damaged by Pakistan.
Click to expand...
Targeting runways can't equal taking out S400 and 6 jets.
There is a reason why in the morning Indian military officials said India was ready to deescalate.
 
PakSword said:
Targeting runways can't equal taking out S400 and 6 jets.
There is a reason why in the morning Indian military officials said India was ready to deescalate.
Click to expand...


IF india WAS winning the war and damaging Pakistan, the war would NEVER stop. In fact the war would still be carrying on. india stopped because they were getting a SEVERE beating by Pakistan.
 
PakSword said:
Targeting runways can't equal taking out S400 and 6 jets.
There is a reason why in the morning Indian military officials said India was ready to deescalate.
Click to expand...

You think that India said yes to ceasefire because of loosing 6 jets?

But that happened on 7th. India should have capitulated and said yes then only?

We all know how things progressed after 7th and how they ended.

You are counting runway craters but not ready to analyse the fact that IAF struck a target 10 Kms from your national capital and GHQ. To me that target had more impact than any other struck by the IAF.

Some times it is not the exact damage but the Intent and the display of capability that is important.

Any source that brings out any report showing that Pakistan was taking in missiles but not able to retaliate are declared as false and motivated.
Damaging S400 is another one of painful reminder to your forces that they were completely toothless in striking anything across.
As a Think Tank you should be able to place facts before speculation.
 
Last edited:
Indians are getting so desperate that they are going on Quora asking the same question again and again.. Did India lose Rafale and whether Chinese jet shot it down.. then they probably answer the question themselves.

This is an effort to overwhelm AI models with the false narrative.

Anyway, neutral sources don't agree with Indians at all.
 
Vkdindian1 said:
You think that India yes to ceasefire because of loosing 6 jets?

But that happened 7th. India should have capitulated and said yes then only?

We all know how things progressed after 7th and how they ended.
Click to expand...
Maybe.. I am just repeating what your military officials said in the morning.. Didn't you hear that too?

A lot of Indians only hear what they want to hear.
 
PakSword said:
Targeting runways can't equal taking out S400 and 6 jets.
There is a reason why in the morning Indian military officials said India was ready to deescalate.
Click to expand...

Runways can be repaired in under 3 hours, no one bothers with these anymore, and also taxiways can be used as emergency runways. Targeting runways looks good in pictures, but it is the assets that are vital, if these remain untouched then you have acheived very little

 
Mighty_Dragon_Strike said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


nature of 'evidence' and how observer is fooled!
Click to expand...

That's for commercial satellites ( if its some rule. Such rule cannot be for military satellite.
 
PakSword said:
Maybe.. I am just repeating what your military officials said in the morning.. Didn't you hear that too?

A lot of Indians only hear what they want to hear.
Click to expand...
It was heard loud and clear. That Pakistan tried to attack four bases and could cause only minor damage.

The same claim was made by ISPR for Indian attacks.

Then came the BDA pictures and we came to know the truth.
If ISPR had even one hazy picture of success then you all wouldn’t have to see this day of trying to claim success based PURELY on circumstantial evidence.
 
Well. Positive result of Pakistan strategic restrain has finally coming to fruition. We have wooed trump quite much lol!

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
PakSword said:
Targeting runways can't equal taking out S400 and 6 jets.
There is a reason why in the morning Indian military officials said India was ready to deescalate.
Click to expand...
No proof for it. About s400.

As I stated neutral people people believe on evidences, if someone say there was something on news article, yet not unverfied as many sources quoted he was amyman.

They can just laugh and move on.

It's kind of joke that china, Pakistan, turkey and including international neutral sources - can't find the evidence of there was a hit.... Even USA media analysis the satelite images and confirmed that no hit
 
Vkdindian1 said:
It was heard loud and clear. That Pakistan tried to attack four bases and could cause only minor damage.

The same claim was made by ISPR for Indian attacks.

Then came the BDA pictures and we came to know the truth.
If ISPR had even one hazy picture of success then you all wouldn’t have to see this day of trying to claim success based PURELY on circumstantial evidence.
Click to expand...

Took out a S-400, you took out a few repair sheds.

Cry harder
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 145 (members: 6, guests: 139)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top