Fatman17
Moderator
I am aware of him Mr bonbonDo "well functioning adults" go to extreme lengths to fool the forum into thinking they are another nationality? How long do we tolerate that?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am aware of him Mr bonbonDo "well functioning adults" go to extreme lengths to fool the forum into thinking they are another nationality? How long do we tolerate that?
India - a nation of a billion plus needs to get his own house in order. Still not 1 iota of proof of whats internationally looking like a false flag.War seems imminent, and both sides are preparing in their own ways. India wants to establish strong deterrence against any future terror attacks on its soil, while Pakistan wants to impose a significant cost on India for any such "misadventure."
In the midst of all this, the core issue is completely lost—which is, frankly, quite ironic.
In my view, a potential conflict in the near future might actually serve a purpose. It could either give Pakistan the deterrence it seeks against India for a long time, or result in significant material damage that forces it to retreat from its confrontational stance on Kashmir.
Realistically, there is no chance of any change in the status of Kashmir, given the current military capabilities of both countries. So, statements like "Kashmir is the jugular vein of Pakistan" or "We will take back Pakistan Azaad Kashmir" are nothing more than empty rhetoric from both sides.
Which brings me to the real question: if neither side can change the status quo, then why are they even fighting—or preparing to fight?
I will do it nowPlease delete your post. Thanks again
Figuring out the contrary view very quickly. Both sides are happy in their own narrative cocoon. I may not dare to disturb it.
Figuring out the contrary view very quickly. Both sides are happy in their own narrative cocoon. I may not dare to disturb it.
Let's be careful out thereThere is no narrative.
Pakistan grounded your airforce and started work on dismantling your western command.
If Trump hadn't stepped in, they would have started bombing Delhi by the evening.
On your end, it's a whole load of copium and sweet sweet lies.![]()
Couldn’t agree more. Every court of law in the world needs proof and evidence before sentencing for even a petty crime but India pronounced Pakistan guilty within minutes of the terror attack without any such thing and proceeded to attack / kill including innocent women and children. Yet Nobody in the west is bothered by that little detail. Just thankful that Pakistan humiliated them in return, just what they deserved.India - a nation of a billion plus needs to get his own house in order. Still not 1 iota of proof of whats internationally looking like a false flag.
You attacked a sovreign nation - and got a bloody nose. What did India expect? FFS - Bring proof to the table and show some proof?
India - a nation of a billion plus needs to get his own house in order. Still not 1 iota of proof of whats internationally looking like a false flag.
You attacked a sovreign nation - and got a bloody nose. What did India expect? FFS - Bring proof to the table and show some proof?
YaarCan find fragments of AMRAAM in the mountains in hours , but not three heavily armed men running around a tourist resort for months
From the looks of it, India seems done with offering proof of attacks allegedly orchestrated by Pakistan. Past efforts—be it 26/11 Mumbai, Pathankot, or Uri—have yielded nothing to suggest Pakistan is serious about prosecuting the perpetrators. So why should India believe things will be any different this time?India - a nation of a billion plus needs to get his own house in order. Still not 1 iota of proof of whats internationally looking like a false flag.
You attacked a sovreign nation - and got a bloody nose. What did India expect? FFS - Bring proof to the table and show some proof?
My friend, if only the world was that simple. We are the mercy of the whims of men.War seems imminent, and both sides are preparing in their own ways. India wants to establish strong deterrence against any future terror attacks on its soil, while Pakistan wants to impose a significant cost on India for any such "misadventure."
In the midst of all this, the core issue is completely lost—which is, frankly, quite ironic.
In my view, a potential conflict in the near future might actually serve a purpose. It could either give Pakistan the deterrence it seeks against India for a long time, or result in significant material damage that forces it to retreat from its confrontational stance on Kashmir.
Realistically, there is no chance of any change in the status of Kashmir, given the current military capabilities of both countries. So, statements like "Kashmir is the jugular vein of Pakistan" or "We will take back Pakistan Azaad Kashmir" are nothing more than empty rhetoric from both sides.
Which brings me to the real question: if neither side can change the status quo, then why are they even fighting—or preparing to fight?
I will repeat myself - where is the proof? Pakistan offered assistance to investigate - nothing accepted.From the looks of it, India seems done with offering proof of attacks allegedly orchestrated by Pakistan. Past efforts—be it 26/11 Mumbai, Pathankot, or Uri—have yielded nothing to suggest Pakistan is serious about prosecuting the perpetrators. So why should India believe things will be any different this time?
We are in a sorry state of diplomacy, and anyone pushing for “another chance” to Pakistan risks political suicide in India.
To his credit, Modi did try—by inviting Nawaz Sharif to India and even visiting Pakistan—but that attempt failed miserably.
From the looks of it, India seems done with offering proof of attacks allegedly orchestrated by Pakistan. Past efforts—be it 26/11 Mumbai, Pathankot, or Uri—have yielded nothing to suggest Pakistan is serious about prosecuting the perpetrators. So why should India believe things will be any different this time?
We are in a sorry state of diplomacy, and anyone pushing for “another chance” to Pakistan risks political suicide in India.
To his credit, Modi did try—by inviting Nawaz Sharif to India and even visiting Pakistan—but that attempt failed miserably.
I will repeat myself - where is the proof? Pakistan offered assistance to investigate - nothing accepted.
You can appoint a third party and show confirmation then you are beibg described as "international pirates". you attacked a sovereign nation.
We dont want you to give Pakistan "another chance" - ffs just show the world the proof.
Truth be said - there isnt any. Embarrassing..............
Ye but every indian member (including the new IDs launched) - keep the same repetitive crap- insinuations and bollax. Not ! iota proof - constant bull crapThere was no proof, it was BS. They've been using steel pellets to blind Kashmiri kids then when something like this happens blame Pakistan.
It's war now and forever. No need to talk or engage with them. They launched first blood, Pakistan hit back, now it's a case of when to hit them next. Horrid lot these sanghis and the people who support them.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.