Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

[Oscar]

that's booster of air laucnhed brahmos, both have same boosters.

How do you know it was air launched?
Please point out from within the picture the exact designation it was air launched.
On our end we have an actual radar officer giving testimony - on your end it is you.. a nobody... so bring exact proof on that picture that it is air launched or be banned from section.

 

[Psyko70]

that's booster of air laucnhed brahmos, both have same boosters.

Another pathetic claim. how low can you stoop

 

[Vkdindian1]

Coming back to the claim - the claim is made specifically to say “Your route is known” so any plans you had from blockade to inserting a MARCOS team to try and claim Ibrahim with body and so on are on hold.

Why not, not declare this and allow the other side to use those routes and then take advantage of this knowledge?

 

[side-winder]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

All Brahmos have same booster

View attachment 156359

Dude, we have shown the real time radar tracks. An actual screen recording showing tracks moving across the IB heading to Rafiqui, Shahbaz and Bholari. You may not know me, but these are the things i personally know to be authentic - nothing like i heard from so and so. Lol

If you want to remain in denial - i can't help you.

Please don't compare these with 2 images which you provided to support F-16 claim. Those were 2 images - no real time tracks in motion. The only difference in before and after being a track deleted in latter. Which you can do manually on an Ops console btw. Lol.

@4:30 onward

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[side-winder]

Sorry but edited and half redacted images are not admissible in any court of law as evidence.
Fact is not even PAF has claimed they were surface launched missiles in it's article stenoed by alan warnes.

Please give your lordship a little trouble of actually watching the video before hitting the keyboard - Or if you are only here to troll and rant - i know what i should do.

1. They are not images like the case of F-16 - but real time tracks in motion moving across the IB.
2. PAF specifically categorized them as SSM.

Watch from 04:30

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Baibers_1260]

Sorry but edited and half redacted images are not admissible in any court of law as evidence.
Fact is not even PAF has claimed they were surface launched missiles in it's article stenoed by alan warnes.

Agree:
Famous historic statements by Indian armed forces officials.
1. "In any operation losses are inevitable ". .. AvM Bharti
2. "Numbers are not important ". .. CDC. Lt. General. Anil Chauhan
3. "We lost aircraft because we were fighting under restraints." , Indian Defence Attache, Indonesia , Captain Shekhar Kumar
4. "The Tea is fantastic ". Wing Commander, Abhinandan Vardhaman

Above statements are admissible in a "court of evidence " ?

 

[Mighty_Dragon_Strike]

Sorry but edited and half redacted images are not admissible in any court of law as evidence.
Fact is not even PAF has claimed they were surface launched missiles in it's article stenoed by alan warnes.

dahhh...


AD is also operated by army air defence

 

[Dark-Lord]

They are not images like the case of F-16 - but real time tracks in motion moving across the IB.
2. PAF specifically categorized them as SSM

Real time tracks do not mentions that were ALCM or SSM.
Even your ispr admitted Rafiqui was attacked by air to surface missiles:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[side-winder]

Real time tracks do not mentions that were ALCM or SSM. Even your ispr admitted Rafiqui was attacked by air to surface missiles:

You are only acting like a clueless troll.

The data in Ops room come as fused into one common picture from across a range of different sensors.

You can read all the track parameters including speed and altitude - and hence construct an entire flight path using the radar data. The launch profile and trajectory of an SSM differs from an Air Launched version.

The absence of any aircraft anywhere near the point of origin of tracks further corroborates the analysis of track parameters. And hence they were specifically categorized as SSMs by DCAS Ops.

Nur Khan and Murid were air launched which i know and have mentioned among a few instances where IAF used hit and run tactics. The press statement by ISPR was given almost instantly after the attacks at night without a proper brief from the AHQs Ops Room and mistakenly included Rafiqui in that list.

Later clarified by DCAS Ops while showing the recording of live tracks.

An air launched weapon is way more difficult to intercept - ever wondered how only about 13-14 hit out of about 30-40 launched on 10th? I didn't know our AD was that good to intercept / spoof air launched weapons with such good success rate. Lol.

 

[Dark-Lord]

data in Ops room come as fused into one common picture from across a range of different sensors.

You can read all the track parameters including speed and altitude - and hence construct an entire flight path using the radar data. The launch profile and trajectory of an SSM differs from an Air Launched version

That is just your version.
Fact is this could be from a simulation or exercise in the war room too.
Just a slide alone does not proof this is the real Deal and not a manipulated data set.

Anyways this dicussion is ended by ISPR himself admitting that rafiqui was attacked by ASMs laucnhed from aircraft .

 

[Dark-Lord]

Nur Khan and Murid were air launched which i know and have mentioned among a few instances where IAF used hit and run tactics. The press statement by ISPR was given almost instantly after the attacks at night without a proper brief from the AHQs Ops Room and mistakenly included Rafiqui in that list.

Again a made up claim without any proof.
If that was true ISPR would have issued a corrected statement or a rejoinder.

 

[hasssanali8998]

Anyways this dicussion is ended by ISPR himself admitting that rafiqui was attacked by ASMs laucnhed from aircraft .

he literally said that was a mistake why don't you understand .

 

[hasssanali8998]

Again a made up claim without any proof.

he is the fucking proof retard

 

[side-winder]

Fact is this could be from a simulation or exercise in the war room too.
Just a slide alone does not proof this is the real Deal and not a manipulated data set.

Haha. So its a denial with head buried - understood.
Kiddo, i have seen these myself. Like i said, you don't know who i am - so continue living in your bubble.

If that was true ISPR would have issued a corrected statement or a rejoinder.

DCAS Ops corrected that with radar evidence. But you can keep your head burried. No problem.

At this point, it's pretty much clear to me - you are just another troll who has no clue what he is talking about. Please don't bother quoting my posts any more.

 

[RescueRanger]

Pakistan has started deploying its assets from Multan to Bahawalpur a week back.
I also saw same situations in 2nd week of April before Pahalgam attack.
Same asset deployment and VIP movement to Bahawalpur with heavy security.

Guys I want you to see the above post. This is the kind of post I really dont wish to see here on PDF.

Kindly remember OPSEC. Also be advised that Official Secrets Act applies. Please don't share such information on an open forum.

If you see such posts kindly use the report feature and highlight as "breaching OPSEC"

Thanks.