Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Disagree form 1990s till now everyone wanted to do as mcuh as corruption and vote for as myas corrupt people as possibleWe got no say in what happens bhai. We (me n you) pay all the taxes along with our 1% of the population like us.
However what we want never gets implemented nor considered no?
How about those 99% who don’t pay taxes but get all the benefits and welfare? Living off of our taxes?
You feel empowered?
They were wise not to bid. There are a few issues:
1) Retain all employees for 10 years.
2) The government of Pakistan raised salaries and pensions for all employees. The new owner must honor those commitments for ten years.
3) Bear all expenses to get the carrier operational.
4) The bidders were highly concerned about the viability of routes, as the government was unable to guarantee their availability post-purchase.
The government's strategy of offloading the asset and shifting the liabilities to a new owner while retaining politically appointed individuals on payroll was a key factor in the bidders' decision to back out. The debt would balloon well before the airline made any profit.
The airline industry looks at the ratio of planes to employees. Spirit Airlines in the U.S., a low-budget airline with 217 planes and 12,700 employees, has a ratio of 59 employees per plane. In contrast, with 30 planes and 8,000 employees, Pakistan has a ratio of 250 employees per plane; just a few years ago, we topped at 500-600 employees per plane.
The best option would be for the sole bidder to either lose or back out if they can't acquire it and start their airlines.
Reason for " No Objection " from PPPP .... Bhutto is still alive.They were wise not to bid. There are a few issues:
1) Retain all employees for 10 years.
2) The government of Pakistan raised salaries and pensions for all employees. The new owner must honor those commitments for ten years.
3) Bear all expenses to get the carrier operational.
4) The bidders were highly concerned about the viability of routes, as the government was unable to guarantee their availability post-purchase.
The government's strategy of offloading the asset and shifting the liabilities to a new owner while retaining politically appointed individuals on payroll was a key factor in the bidders' decision to back out. The debt would balloon well before the airline made any profit.
The airline industry looks at the ratio of planes to employees. Spirit Airlines in the U.S., a low-budget airline with 217 planes and 12,700 employees, has a ratio of 59 employees per plane. In contrast, with 30 planes and 8,000 employees, Pakistan has a ratio of 250 employees per plane; just a few years ago, we topped at 500-600 employees per plane.
The best option would be for the sole bidder to either lose or back out if they can't acquire it and start their airlines.
Govt also wanted the management to remain unchanged for 5 years.
Basically, just a sham excercise for the IMF
Reason for " No Objection " from PPPP .... Bhutto is still alive.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.