Pakistan is getting dry

[hasssanali8998]

I dpnt understand how 80% water can be allocated to pak

u get Ravi, Beas, Sutlej
we get Indus, Jhelum, Chenab
if u dont like the deal question then people that singed a binding agreement

 

[Master Chief]

I dpnt understand how 80% water can be allocated to pak

Do not intentionally misrepresent the IWT and its terms on every thread you feel an urge to come and vomit over.

Once again for your benefit:

3 eastern rivers and 3 western rivers.

The sources of ALL 6 rivers, to varying degrees, exist in today's Hindustan AND the disputed territories occupied by Hindustan. The majority of the flood plains of the 6 rivers are split between Pakistan and Hindustan based on their relative utility by either nation.

The treaty is in place to mitigate a harmful and deleterious jurisdiction of Hindustan over ALL 6 river sources (particularly in the context of some sources being in disputed territory, but even notwithstanding that fact). The treaty ensures that United Nations binding resolutions on riparian rights during peacetime and wartime are adhered to by a particular malevolent actor.

Hindustan has no legal, diplomatic, contractual, or defensible basis on which to declare "abeyance". I don't think Hindustanis even understand what the word means or they wouldn't try to use it here.

 

[peacemaker99]

Do not intentionally misrepresent the IWT and its terms on every thread you feel an urge to come and vomit over.

Once again for your benefit:

3 eastern rivers and 3 western rivers.

The sources of ALL 6 rivers, to varying degrees, exist in today's Hindustan AND the disputed territories occupied by Hindustan. The majority of the flood plains of the 6 rivers are split between Pakistan and Hindustan based on their relative utility by either nation.

The treaty is in place to mitigate a harmful and deleterious jurisdiction of Hindustan over ALL 6 river sources (particularly in the context of some sources being in disputed territory, but even notwithstanding that fact). The treaty ensures that United Nations binding resolutions on riparian rights during peacetime and wartime are adhered to by a particular malevolent actor.

Hindustan has no legal, diplomatic, contractual, or defensible basis on which to declare "abeyance". I don't think Hindustanis even understand what the word means or they wouldn't try to use it here.

View attachment 202841

How come you arrnt ready to use the same logic pf utlity to oppose chinese dam construction on brahmaputra?

 

[peacemaker99]

u get Ravi, Beas, Sutlej
we get Indus, Jhelum, Chenab
if u dont like the deal question then people that singed a binding agreement

Yeah nbut nehru was a pacifist and you have to write contract on reality not ideology.