Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

Does Pakistan have any plans to build underground missile cities/bunkers/tunnels to protect these missiles and launchers. Pakistan needs atleast 20, we have mountains aswell so underground cities deep inside mountains will give protection from airstrikes.
 
I wonder what makes you think like that ?
If what you are writing is true, India may aswell attack now and get done with Pakistan, because there won't be a mutually assured destruction.
Pakistani پٹاخے will do less damage cummulatively , than a single Indian warhead.
That also renders tge entire Pakistani nuclear doctrine and planners into the category چ
I don't think think you understand basic math, 50 kilotons is on the smaller end for modern nuclear bombs but it will still devastate any major urban center, also in the case nuclear bombs there's diminishing returns, a 100kt bomb might have double the yield of a 50kt bomb but does not mean it will have double the blast radius, to double it you require roughly a 400 kiloton warhead.

I thought you being "rocket man" Here would understand this basic concept.
 
Last edited:
Does Pakistan have any plans to build underground missile cities/bunkers/tunnels to protect these missiles and launchers. Pakistan needs atleast 20, we have mountains aswell so underground cities deep inside mountains will give protection from airstrikes.

I asked this same question before somewhere in other thread, it requires more money ($$$$), 10-20 years development and new heavy machinery necessary from China.
 
They know each and every detail of our strategic missiles. That NESCOM senior scientist who got hanged for treason gave them what they needed.
Some got hanged - others earlier met demises other ways.
This is one place where a career means you essentially sign away your life.
 
wese when did that happpen? like hanged any article ?
I can only find this article.


Looks like the jernail escaped punishment though, as expected in Faujistan.

 
I don't think think you understand basic math, 50 kilotons is on the smaller end for modern nuclear bombs but it will still devastate any major urban center, also in the case nuclear bombs there's diminishing returns, a 100kt bomb might have double the yield of a 50kt bomb but does not mean it will have double the blast radius, to double it you require roughly a 400 kiloton warhead.

I thought you being "rocket man" Here would understand this basic concept.
Sure, blast radius does not scale linearly with yield, nobody is disputing that. But larger yields are not just about “more city damage per kiloton.” They give you more coverage, more tolerance for CEP and targeting error, and a better chance of destroying hardened or spread out targets even if the strike is not perfectly accurate. That is exactly why larger yields still make sense for counterstrike roles against nuclear complexes and other high value infrastructure such as hardened missile silos , sub bases which for India and Pakistan are few or barely non-existent.

The most critical factor in the India-Pakistan nuclear dynamic is distance in that most targets are within 4-8 minute flight times for both countries. No early warning as such matters here - then take urban density - Dallas Metro is 3500 people per square miles on nearly 9000 square miles of land on which means to really make an impact in Dallas you do need hundreds of kilotons and possible several to effectively destroy the area.

Meanwhile, Greater Mumbai is only 233 square miles but 76000 people per square mile(about 2.5 times Dallas) - which means a 50 kiloton warhead will vaporize much more than the many hundred kilotons needed for Dallas.

Then there is the counterforce argument - because of the mobile nature of the systems on both sides in general - any counterforce relies on near perfect intelligence and Pakistan has been practicing rotating its nuclear assets since 1980. Even if post 1 exchange India decides to go for a full decapitation strike, its best bet is to hit Islamabad with the shortest flight time and with massive firepower so that any leadership bunkers are also evaporated.

Anything barring that and Pakistan hits back - India not only ceases to exist as a state but also the overall firestorms from densely packed cities, infrastructure and so on basically create nuclear winter globally and for the subcontinent with general weather patterns blowing west to east(other than winter monsoon) even the strikes on Pakistan continue to devastate whoever is left alive in India for decades if not a century or more to come.

The reason I state this all is to show that weapons sophistication and yield matter much less when you both can hear each other breathe and fart.
 
Does Pakistan have any plans to build underground missile cities/bunkers/tunnels to protect these missiles and launchers. Pakistan needs atleast 20, we have mountains aswell so underground cities deep inside mountains will give protection from airstrikes.
what makes you think we don't have them ? Do you think we haven't learnt from Iran?
haven't learned from DPRK , CHINA or any other Nuclear power who is carving out mountains?? SPD ke pas black budget aise hi nai hai , there are places and sites which i have personally found , that those indian "osintiya accounts" , "pak nuclear sites exposed" can only think of.
 
Last edited:
most of Pakistan's arsenal is relatively low yield, probably 40-50 kiloton for the largest ones carried by Shaheen 3s, 10 kiloton ones carried by Baburs raads and Abdalis, 2-3 kiloton one for battlefield use from Nasrs.

Indians probably have 200 kiloton warheads. Hell even the North Korea has tested 250 kiloton warhead.
Most of our arsenal is now plutonium based with much higher yields .
 
most of Pakistan's arsenal is relatively low yield, probably 40-50 kiloton for the largest ones carried by Shaheen 3s, 10 kiloton ones carried by Baburs raads and Abdalis, 2-3 kiloton one for battlefield use from Nasrs.

Indians probably have 200 kiloton warheads. Hell even the North Korea has tested 250 kiloton warhead.


That was the case until about 2007. Since then, most of our nukes have been plutonium based which have much higher yields than our older uranium-based nukes.
 
Well, Pakistan army had or may still have spies working for USA .


Most likely we have. When the Americans usually aren't barking against Pakistan, it often means that they have some level of control.

Although, Pakistan is certainly develop powerful newer missiles and the Americans are very concerned about that.
 
Does Pakistan have any plans to build underground missile cities/bunkers/tunnels to protect these missiles and launchers. Pakistan needs atleast 20, we have mountains aswell so underground cities deep inside mountains will give protection from airstrikes.

Don't be surprised if Pakistan already has such infrastructure. Obviously extremely secretive. Not having it would the most illogical thing.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

so our forces are also in a position . i yhink they will do one or two more tests
 
I could be wrong but we are living in 2026 while osintiyas are sharing videos from 2025.
These shameless creatures will do anything for elonbucks
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
.
I could be wrong but we are living in 2026 while osintiyas are sharing videos from 2025.
These shameless creatures will do anything for elonbucks
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


its just non stop from Pakistan

keep going strong
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top