Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

Also why specifically hd-1 cm-302 is similar weapon already in service with pla and pn and also has air launched and surface launched variants. Why not standardizw
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


What the hell is the long range precision munition. Ive heard no mention of it before.
 
So is Fatah II, and probably with a larger warhead size, I was thinking in terms of destructive power. We don't know anything about the range yet. It's definitely more versatile for the PAF and Navy, in my view.
FATAH II is still a rocket; this one is a cruise missile. There is a huge difference between the two.
 
Haters will say It's a Chinese import .
But that doesn't matter.
Point is that the boys have been busy and now have a credible supersonic cruise missile in the arsenal.
Also its a local production, its not under MCTR and range can be greater than 290km.
Best of both worlds.
You don't spend money on R&D , have the weapon under TOT , brand it own and use it for whatever range.
 
Haters will say It's a Chinese import .
But that doesn't matter.
Point is that the boys have been busy and now have a credible supersonic cruise missile in the arsenal.
Also its a local production, its not under MCTR and range can be greater than 290km.
Best of both worlds.
You don't spend money on R&D , have the weapon under TOT , brand it own and use it for whatever range.
Haters should look at their yakhoont derivatives.
 
Haters should look at their yakhoont derivatives.
tbh my biggest critique here is the naming convention.

They've literally split Fatah into 4 distinct missile types: GMLRS, SSM BM, GLCM, and now SSCM. I get that they want Fatah to be ARFC's thing now, but I seriously don't think this was the plan -- the original Fatah-II was an extended-range Fatah-I.

At the rate they're going, they might start calling Shahed-style LMs "Fatah Munna" and stuff.

They need to split off the names across the different families.
 
tbh my biggest critique here is the naming convention.

They've literally split Fatah into 4 distinct missile types: GMLRS, SSM BM, GLCM, and now SSCM. I get that they want Fatah to be ARFC's thing now, but I seriously don't think this was the plan -- the original Fatah-II was an extended-range Fatah-I.

At the rate they're going, they might start calling Shahed-style LMs "Fatah Munna" and stuff.

They need to split off the names across the different families.
Fatah munna lmaooo
 
tbh my biggest critique here is the naming convention.

They've literally split Fatah into 4 distinct missile types: GMLRS, SSM BM, GLCM, and now SSCM. I get that they want Fatah to be ARFC's thing now, but I seriously don't think this was the plan -- the original Fatah-II was an extended-range Fatah-I.

At the rate they're going, they might start calling Shahed-style LMs "Fatah Munna" and stuff.

They need to split off the names across the different families.
Basically this, You have 4 distinct missiles which are nothing alike but are part of the Same series.

BTW the original F1 and F2 made no sense either it was named so because babus wanted to pretend a TBM like F2 was a GMLRS.

What if they make a upgraded variant of the F1 what will it be called? F1+? What if they make a another variant after that? Fatah 1 ++
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top