phatherland saaaaaar .
Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion
- Thread starter ghazi52
- Start date
Waz
Administrator
Your economic figures are a mirage and have been taken apart by economists the world over, when people have been asking why India hasn't been able to reach global power status. You can't even produce enough jobs for your young people, who then scramble for visas to every western state they can.
Sure the infrastructure is near your 'doorstep', but most of yours is well within striking range of Pakistani weapons as well. The smaller size gives advantages as well in terms of being able to mobilise faster than you can and with less of an area to defend, which also means far more concentrated defence.
Pakistan isn't a narrow country, compared to India it is, not compared to other states. Strategic depth is a myth that's been laid bare in history with numerous battles rendering a nation with a large land expanse defeated. With modern weapons that negates this further. If you hit a nuke plant your nation will get nuked simple, your army didn't even dare go there, they even admitted that. You literally just made it up like you do with virtually all your posts.
Most of your missiles were intercepted but yes, some got through and caused damage. You lost formations of planes which your military chiefs hid at first then told the world that "losses didn't matter". Regardless that gap in defence is being worked at round the clock, and now far more advanced missiles will be coming your way.
No one ran to Trump this is BS made up by you and your press you loyally follow.
Here is your ex-army chief talking about having dialogue;
Ex-Army chief Naravane backs RSS leader's remarks on dialogue with Pakistan
Ex-Army Chief Naravane supports RSS leader's call for dialogue with Pakistan, emphasizing the importance of people-to-people connections.
Not a single Pakistani military chief, high ranking general etc has come out with this. This goes to show your higher ups are taking Pakistani preparations seriously and don't want conflict.
Also let's just say Pakistan ran to Trump so why did you agree, why give up the military advantage of 'all those bases attacked'? That's because it is BS, that you keep trying to put sugar on. Haven't you heard the saying 'you can't polish a turd'?
Pakistani missile production has ramped up, why do you think you're seeing so many tests, it's going very well indeed. Also do remember any shortage can be replenished by China, who the world knows you are $hit scared of and won't say a thing.
Anyway that's your last post on this thread, you go off-topic and you're well known to bring the same BS over and over again.
"We are ten times bigger"
"India destroyed all Pakistani bases"
"India ran to Trump"
"Indian too powerful".
What a joke.
mythbuster
SpeedLimited
Delhi was never far away neither was Somnath... keep on hoarding we will send jizzaya collectors in due time.
Corax
Registered Member
As Robert Downey Jr said in Tropic Thunder, "never go full retard". In your case, you make Forrest Gump look like a genius.
ThoroughPro
Registered Member
We attacked two S4 batteries, and took out both effectively in first "simple" brute attempt.
Think about it.
falcon34
Registered Member
I hope the indian keep the delusions the F series will with missiles will cover up around 1000-1500km with different subsonic, supersonic, guided rockets and a SRBM.
The rest of India with pounded loitering munitions relentless. And what works best for the indians won't be able to hit the rocket force like the US has been able to hit IRGC. India will get a pounding of it's life
The rest of India with pounded loitering munitions relentless. And what works best for the indians won't be able to hit the rocket force like the US has been able to hit IRGC. India will get a pounding of it's life
Falcon26
Trusted Member
In the next conflict, Pakistan must escalate beyond Kashmir and Punjab and strike India’s major cities, especially New Delhi and Mumbai. The hindutva crowd must feel the pain of war. I have been arguing during last year’s war that Pakistan must escalate when residents of its major cities were being subjected to the horrors of war. Unfortunately, Pakistan didn’t escalate and allowed India to salvage some sort of face saving points. Quwa recently had a wonderful article that argued against Pakistan’s horrendous “restraint and maturity” doctrine and why this mindset would undercut any future Pakistani gains in the next war, as it did in the 2025 skirmishes.
Do yourself a favor and read the article
quwa.org
Do yourself a favor and read the article
The Flaw in Pakistan’s High-Tech Defence Strategy - Quwa
Pakistan is building ISTAR and precision-strike capacity to create openings against India, but has the policy mindset caught up to exploit them before they close?
quwa.org
RealNapster
Elite Member
In the next conflict, Pakistan must escalate beyond Kashmir and Punjab and strike India’s major cities, especially New Delhi and Mumbai. The hindutva crowd must feel the pain of war. I have been arguing during last year’s war that Pakistan must escalate when residents of its major cities were being subjected to the horrors of war. Unfortunately, Pakistan didn’t escalate and allowed India to salvage some sort of face saving points. Quwa recently had a wonderful article that argued against Pakistan’s horrendous “restraint and maturity” doctrine and why this mindset would undercut any future Pakistani gains in the next war, as it did in the 2025 skirmishes.
Do yourself a favor and read the article
The Flaw in Pakistan’s High-Tech Defence Strategy - Quwa
Pakistan is building ISTAR and precision-strike capacity to create openings against India, but has the policy mindset caught up to exploit them before they close?
Obviously we should. Because last time they even sent drones to peshawar. Which is far far away from india-pakistan front. So no Indian city should be spared but there shout be symmetry in warfare.
Falcon26
Trusted Member
If you look back at history, Pakistan has consistently underestimated India’s reaction. In 1965, Pakistan’s progress in Kashmir sector was undercut by India’s incursion into Pakistan proper because Pakistani military planners didn’t anticipate India to cross the international border. In Kargil, they didn’t anticipate India to respond the way it did, they thought India would respond with the muted style Pakistan did in the 1980s when India captured Siachen glacier. Again in 2025, Pakistan didn’t anticipate India to fire missile salvos at major Pakistani urban centers.
How long will the GHQ continue to underestimate India’s capacity to escalate and not take advantage of initial blows done by the Pakistan military?
This is precisely why the “maturity and restraint” doctrine is problematic. And to think a guy got awarded a field marshal for this response is quite staggering, but hey, this is Pakistan
hasssanali8998
Elite Member
100 yiha III'sIf you look back at history, Pakistan has consistently underestimated India’s reaction. In 1965, Pakistan’s progress in Kashmir sector was undercut by India’s incursion into Pakistan proper because Pakistani military planners didn’t anticipate India to cross the international border. In Kargil, they didn’t anticipate India to respond the way it did, they thought India would respond with the muted style Pakistan did in the 1980s when India captured Siachen glacier. Again in 2025, Pakistan didn’t anticipate India to fire missile salvos at major Pakistani urban centers.
How long will the GHQ continue to underestimate India’s capacity to escalate and not take advantage of initial blows done by the Pakistan military?
This is precisely why the “maturity and restraint” doctrine is problematic. And to think a guy got awarded a field marshal for this response is quite staggering, but hey, this is Pakistan
Blueishere
Registered Member
I would take the dialogue honestly, we need some economic wiggle roomYour economic figures are a mirage and have been taken apart by economists the world over, when people have been asking why India hasn't been able to reach global power status. You can't even produce enough jobs for your young people, who then scramble for visas to every western state they can.
Sure the infrastructure is near your 'doorstep', but most of yours is well within striking range of Pakistani weapons as well. The smaller size gives advantages as well in terms of being able to mobilise faster than you can and with less of an area to defend, which also means far more concentrated defence.
Pakistan isn't a narrow country, compared to India it is, not compared to other states. Strategic depth is a myth that's been laid bare in history with numerous battles rendering a nation with a large land expanse defeated. With modern weapons that negates this further. If you hit a nuke plant your nation will get nuked simple, your army didn't even dare go there, they even admitted that. You literally just made it up like you do with virtually all your posts.
Most of your missiles were intercepted but yes, some got through and caused damage. You lost formations of planes which your military chiefs hid at first then told the world that "losses didn't matter". Regardless that gap in defence is being worked at round the clock, and now far more advanced missiles will be coming your way.
No one ran to Trump this is BS made up by you and your press you loyally follow.
Here is your ex-army chief talking about having dialogue;
Ex-Army chief Naravane backs RSS leader's remarks on dialogue with Pakistan
Ex-Army Chief Naravane supports RSS leader's call for dialogue with Pakistan, emphasizing the importance of people-to-people connections.www.thehindu.com
Not a single Pakistani military chief, high ranking general etc has come out with this. This goes to show your higher ups are taking Pakistani preparations seriously and don't want conflict.
Also let's just say Pakistan ran to Trump so why did you agree, why give up the military advantage of 'all those bases attacked'? That's because it is BS, that you keep trying to put sugar on. Haven't you heard the saying 'you can't polish a turd'?
Pakistani missile production has ramped up, why do you think you're seeing so many tests, it's going very well indeed. Also do remember any shortage can be replenished by China, who the world knows you are $hit scared of and won't say a thing.
Anyway that's your last post on this thread, you go off-topic and you're well known to bring the same BS over and over again.
"We are ten times bigger"
"India destroyed all Pakistani bases"
"India ran to Trump"
"Indian too powerful".
What a joke.
Aziqbal
Elite Member
Tanks, fighters and missiles are no longer the only wining weapons
Pakistan is rapidly building an indigenous, fully networked electronic warfare and air-defence ecosystem centered around passive detection systems like RIBAT and VERA-E, AESA radar networks such as the AM-350S, Machaan GRAD and SR-3D, offensive jamming systems like Trident EA-1 and MIGAES, counter-drone systems like Hisar-1, and a sovereign Link-17 datalink connecting air, land, sea and drone assets into an integrated “kill chain.”
Pakistan is shifting from dependence on imported systems toward “sensor dominance,” AI-assisted cognitive EW, passive tracking, distributed mobile radars and long-range precision suppression of enemy air defences through systems like the Fatah-IV anti-radiation missile, which is described as capable of homing onto Indian radar emissions including systems linked to the S-400 Triumph network.
Whoever controls the electromagnetic spectrum and the battlefield network may control the war.
Pakistan is building an indigenous, survivable, network-centric, electronically integrated military ecosystem which can detect enemies passively, jam communications and radars, survive SEAD attacks, coordinate drones/fighters/missiles together and raise the cost of attack for India.
Pakistan is rapidly building an indigenous, fully networked electronic warfare and air-defence ecosystem centered around passive detection systems like RIBAT and VERA-E, AESA radar networks such as the AM-350S, Machaan GRAD and SR-3D, offensive jamming systems like Trident EA-1 and MIGAES, counter-drone systems like Hisar-1, and a sovereign Link-17 datalink connecting air, land, sea and drone assets into an integrated “kill chain.”
Pakistan is shifting from dependence on imported systems toward “sensor dominance,” AI-assisted cognitive EW, passive tracking, distributed mobile radars and long-range precision suppression of enemy air defences through systems like the Fatah-IV anti-radiation missile, which is described as capable of homing onto Indian radar emissions including systems linked to the S-400 Triumph network.
Whoever controls the electromagnetic spectrum and the battlefield network may control the war.
Pakistan is building an indigenous, survivable, network-centric, electronically integrated military ecosystem which can detect enemies passively, jam communications and radars, survive SEAD attacks, coordinate drones/fighters/missiles together and raise the cost of attack for India.
RealNapster
Elite Member
Modern warfare is changing. I think it's time Army change its rules and make FSC as compulsory/minimum requirement for new recruits.
SABRE
Registered Member
I believe FA/FSc is already the minimum requirement. The Pakistan armed forces recruitment is also a hoodwink. It discreetly lures those who are troublemakers and uninterested in studies into joining the forces. Once in, they send them off for education all the way up to the graduate (MS) level.
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
Country Watch Latest
-
Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds (175 Viewers)- Latest: Persian Gulf
-
The death of US defense autonomy - 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (10 Viewers)- Latest: Starlord
-
-
-
Latest Posts
-
-
Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds (175 Viewers)
- Latest: Persian Gulf
-
-
-
