Jango
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
The US administration has to get tough with Israel.
I wouldn't have my hopes up if I were you.
It is going to be interesting how long this whole charade keeps up for, and for how long all the "partners" play along for.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The US administration has to get tough with Israel.
Hi,@MastanKhan I know you are battling ill health but this is another case of lost opportunities just like Yemen. Concur?
The shoe polisher calls the American predator-in-chief “True savior of South Asia”
View attachment 179832
You cannot make them happy. Even you gave away your daughter afia and your 80,000 people and your most beloved leader. White man only accept talk of strength. Let iran fall. Then they will make your countries like a sliceThere’s no shortage of legitimate criticism of the current regime, which in this case is plainly the Army you seem intent on shielding through semantic detours (sitting government??!!)
Asim and co’s overt pro-Israel posture wasn’t born of Pak national interest.. it was strategic alignment, a calculated attempt by the illegitimate dictatorship to curry favor with the international establishment, even if it meant further alienating a public they’ve long since estranged...
So no, you don’t get to scold the awam for reacting to the outrageous decisions made by the ruling mafia.... And reducing this to "one party’s fault" isn’t argument, it’s evasion dressed up as analysis...
Israel wants to go in Gaza and take it over, but doing it overtly would put pressure on them (they don't really care), and the US (which does).
So better to have some minion states under the auspices of Mr Trump to have that force, and still achieve the objective you want (i.e. control Gaza through your forces, keep Hamas out).
Anybody who thinks this board of peace is making the Gaza Riviera for the betterment of Gazans really needs to wake up and smell the coffee.
Secondly, nobody worth their salt actually thought Pakistan was sending troops in, especially after Israeli statements a while back.
If you look at the two names there Indonesia and Pakistan they are the most populous Muslim countries in the world. Pakistan, in particular, is a major power in the Muslim world and possesses nuclear weapons. If they send soldiers there and are ready to operate under Israeli administration, do you realize what that means?.What warrants this to be conflated with recognition? Does zion consider this as such?
Very unassuming
Either they are afraid of an army possessing atomic power, or they do not trust Asim Munir.And they never know a rightful general can lead the army in near future and it may create trouble for them and second When they promote someone in occupied countries, they study the personality and they know about their assets more than the asset himself.My guess is Israel flat out objected to Pakistan.
"If you look at the two names there—Indonesia and Pakistan—they are the most populous Muslim countries in the world. Pakistan, in particular, is a major power in the Muslim world and possesses nuclear weapons. If they send soldiers there and are ready to operate under Israeli administration, do you realize what that means?.
They want legitimacy at any cost. They may call it 5,000 years ago that was promised to them. They cannot hide behind this stupid lie for long. New generation, which is not religious, is not going to buy it.
Everyone is playing their own game until the time arrives. Muslim countries were divided into small pieces after the fall of the Ottoman Empire. The idea of nationalism was created to replace the concept of the Ummah. And they have already sliced up many Muslim countries ever since they were created after the Ottoman Empire's collapse. The ladt target is Iran. All those countries are already occupied.just look at where American military bases are. They are already occupied. Even your country, Pakistan, has a U.S. embassy bigger than its GHQ (General Headquarters) and Parliament. So you know you not free country you are already occupiedYou don't have to make the case for me... I have been very clear about this...
Orange needed an off ramp to unload the dirty work and "optics" from zion... put lipstick on the colonial pig!
Of course zion wouldn't ask this directly of any Muslim state that would put shadow on the aura cultivated by the invincible zion... that got dragged through the mud and subsequently got foild in the 12 day folly against Iran where they literally blindsided Iranians using brainwashed and cultivated props...
It had to be the US and I can see the use of any courting by orange to grant recognition to fairly marginalized, largely ostracized and unpopular regime at home and globally seeking legitimacy...
Guess what they'll eat it right up... at home everyone sees right through it and largely ignores it. This though was brought in by the consensus between emirates and Saudis while it was still a thing... much water has since gone under that bridge. It has created a quandary where they assumed could be marched along.
This isn't anything new though Mush had moved the first needle on Pakistan's principled stance of calling zion an illegitimate state and saying that Pakistan would be fine with 67 borders.... remember Pakistan isn't a party to camp David and therefore 67 borders have nothing to do with Pakistani stance. Both those who did camp David or now calling for Abraham Accords are meaningless shenanigans of colonial imposters seeking legitimacy while maintaining the aura... ALL CAME ON THEIR KNEES! sorta wet dream.
In current scenario Pakistan will play ball as long as orange keeps courting it...
All I saw was a group of Epstein islanders….
The shoe polisher calls the American predator-in-chief “True savior of South Asia”
View attachment 179832
Do you think third party intervention is part of Pakistan's nuclear doctrine?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.