None of what you have said contradicts my point :
"Good - so, let's stop the talk of Saudi having some 'moral high ground' in this conflict, it clearly does not.. It is involved in the same naked war of conflict and control that it accuses Iran of, and the only thing on the table is who is more successful at it. Both countries are equally as ugly as each other in stoking conflict in the middle east."
Moral high ground is not starting the hostiles in 1979 (rather among other things hosting many of those cursed Iranian Mullah's - including that very Indian Khomeini who lived in exile in Kuwait and Iraq for a while later to escape to France where he became a Western/French agent tasked to destroy the real Iranian opposition to the Shah - communists and socialists).
Moral high ground is not supporting anti-state terrorist proxies against neighbors for decades in order to gain some kind of backward regional hegemony that would never occur and will never occur in the first place.
Moral high ground is being a prosperous (one of the world's most prosperous countries in fact) country in a otherwise very chaotic region and a country which has close and cordial ties with almost every single Muslim and non-Muslim nation of worth and importance in this world.
Moral high ground is being a safe heaven for millions of workers and residents from across the planet.
Moral high ground is being a source of stability and prosperity in the region by supporting regional integration (hence KSA combating the division of Yemen aided by UAE and Israel), Somalia's integrity (against Somaliland and now KSA is deeply involved in Somalia militarily and economically), trying to restore peace and order in Sudan and taking the side of the least retarded side (Sudanese government), heroically standing with the Syrian people for almost 15 + years against all odds (along with Turkiye and others) who were daily slaughtered by one of the most brutal dictators and regimes in the modern era.
Moral high ground is never recognizing Israel since 1948 (as the ONLY relevant country in the region), and being the main economic and political supporter of Palestine since 1948. Fully supported by the Palestinian government, Fatah and even elements within Hamas despite certain disagreements.
Moral high ground is welcoming every single Muslim to Makkah and Madinah and permanently abolishing the fiqh divisions that always occurred where each sect played among themselves in their own specific corners and with their own clerics. Now every single Muslim prays jointly together irrespective of sect. As well as making Hajj and Umrah available to 1-5 million times more pilgrims than before and easier than ever before.
Moral high ground is also being one of the biggest humanitarian donors in the world.
I wonder what good the Iranian regime has done in the region since 1979 other than supporting (opportunistically) non-state (mostly terrorist actors) who are one of the main sources of destabilization of the region?
How have they run Iran since 1979? What moral high ground does a regime that murders 1000's of their own people (as early as this year)?
Imagine the Saudi Arabian regime killing 10,000's or so of our own for solely protesting and having large-scale protest almost every single year on end. Having active insurgencies from oppressed/discontent minorities spanning from Kurds, Baloch, Arabs and religious minorities.
Sure, exact same moral high ground. Why not go live in Iran if they can do nothing wrong? Seems like all the Iranian cheerleaders and keyboard warriors are sitting behind their screens, including the Iranians themselves here - mostly based in the very same West that is attacking their beloved regime while we speak?
Last thing I would be doing if KSA was ever attacked would be to sit on PDF or any online community but I guess people are different.
