Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Pakistani regime of the day often makes decisions for its immediate survival that turn out to be long-term albatrosses around the nation's neck.
Won't happen, the Saudis, much like other GCC states, have no compulsion in throwing us under the bus...look at what they've done to the Palestinians and other Arab countries.If need be..yes
This is Dollar Chumma, bro.I see nothing but good coming from this collaboration. For decades we were ridiculed for uttering the words muslim ummah. Now finally we are seeing a glimpse, a ray of hope of musim nations uniting. Whats there to be critical about.
Gradual? It's a complete meltdownDo you see gradual desperation creeping in this Indian scumbag tweets?
Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy. So, they at least have a legitimate government. The Pakistani regime has come into power by subverting Pakistan's Constitution and the will of the Pakistani people. They have no legitimacy in the eyes of the domestic constituency. That is why they are willing to sell Pakistan's long-term interests to foreign powers just to ensure the survival of their regime. In 2015, the decision on whether to support the Saudis against Yemen was put before the Parliament, which still had some legitimacy at that time, and was rejected because it was against Pakistan's interests. Now, the illegitimate government has committed Pakistani forces against Yemen, Iran and all other adversaries of Saudi Arabia without even the pretence of a discussion with Parliament or even the Cabinet. What other reason was there for it other than the desperation for continued Saudi support for the regime's survival ? If the Saudis withdraw the billions they have provided as an economic lifeline, the IMF bailout will collapse and the regime will fall.Survival? are you not aware its the Saudi and GCC who are desperate for this protection, not Pakistan! each and every strategic move has it own set of compulsions and designs, you Indians tend to jumble them up all together to sell your narrative.
Pakistan could not effectively defend its assets on its own territory.
IAF pin pointly targeted PAF with its limited deployment of brahmos & Scalps and PAF miserably failed to deliver a reciprocal blow to IAF.
After this conflict, I am not confident of Pak Military to provide any sort of effective conventional military cover to Pakistanis let alone GCC where Israel/US can deploy weapons much superior in technology, doctrine and operators.
However, if this agreement can bring some investment in Pak's tiny defence industry to mass produce weapons like missiles & drones, that would be best possible outcome of this pact.
KSA can get the ToT for its own manufacturing industry.Win win for both.
Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy. So, they at least have a legitimate government. The Pakistani regime has come into power by subverting Pakistan's Constitution and the will of the Pakistani people. They have no legitimacy in the eyes of the domestic constituency. That is why they are willing to sell Pakistan's long-term interests to foreign powers just to ensure the survival of their regime. In 2015, the decision on whether to support the Saudis against Yemen was put before the Parliament, which still had some legitimacy at that time, and was rejected because it was against Pakistan's interests. Now, the illegitimate government has committed Pakistani forces against Yemen, Iran and all other adversaries of Saudi Arabia without even the pretence of a discussion with Parliament or even the Cabinet. What other reason was there for it other than the desperation for continued Saudi support for the regime's survival ? If the Saudis withdraw the billions they have provided as an economic lifeline, the IMF bailout will collapse and the regime will fall.
My friend, let's stick to facts and common sense. The American military footprint in the Middle East is a flexible regime, the White House decides to increase or decrease it in view of regional developments. The US deployed a massive military force in the region to liberate Kuwait from Iraq in 1991, much of it was withdrawn from the region after the war. There was no need for it in subsequent years.I am not the only one who said that the American firepower in the Middle East is reduced; I saw some other today, maybe even an Indian analyst, who said something like 'The Arab world saw what Iran did and so they think maybe they too can do try to have some spine' (paraphrased).
Destroying Iran using carpet bombing would also mean destroying Israel, the American bases, and the American investments, and the GCC infrastructure and hence both Iran and America did the same old tit for tat dance that they did in the Trump first administration.
So, yes, the American firepower in the Middle East is greatly reduced; forget about putting the boots on the ground like in Iraq 2003--those days are long gone--short of dropping massive nukes, even a middling power like Iran can exact a too heavy price.
But you are entitled to remain in your awe of a past which has long gone.
Are you serious? Is that what Pakistan is getting in return for a "defence pact"? We provide a nuclear umbrella and cannon fodder for the Saudis, and in return we get diplomatic threats against the indians if they attack Pakistan?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.