Pakistan seeks $10b in US backstop facility

"old habits" die hard unfortunately.

Hopefully the USA declines.. Pakistan needs to get its house in order ...
This facility is meant for short-term emergencies like runs on the currency, and not structural BoP problems like Pakistan has, so, under any other administration, it would have been declined. However, Trump used it last year to help out his buddy Milei in the Argentinean elections last year. So, my concern is that may get sanctioned to help out Trump and Vance's favorite brown people, in return for some under the table quid pro quo that might prove expensive for Pakistan in the long run.
 
WASHINGTON:
Pakistan has asked the United States for a $10 billion exchange stabilisation facility, according to a source briefed on the matter, which, if approved, could provide a lifeline for the cash-strapped South Asian economy.


The request, which is being reported for the first time, follows Pakistan's role in brokering talks over the Iran war, which raised its diplomatic profile and stirred hopes that it could seek economic gains from Washington and other partners.

In the request to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Islamabad is seeking a Bilateral Exchange Stabilization Support Facility between the US and the Pakistani government worth $10 billion with maturity of up to five years.

The facility, if agreed to, would bolster Pakistan's reserves, ease pressure on the rupee and reduce its reliance on multilateral financing, even as Islamabad undertakes tighter fiscal and monetary policies in line with its International Monetary Fund programme.

Pakistan remains under $7 billion IMF discipline that has required politically unpopular tax increases, spending restraint and reforms.

Pakistan's finance ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters request for comment outside of Asia business hours. The US Treasury also did not immediately respond to request for comment.

Exchange stabilization facilities are rare US Treasury backstops, usually routed via the Exchange Stabilization Fund, that provide dollars, swaps or guarantees to support reserves and steady currencies.

These facilities are different from the permanent standing dollar swap lines that the US Federal Reserve has with some major central banks and acts as an international supply line of US dollars to underpin financial stability.


A 2025 Argentina package was the first new foreign-government exchange stabilization facility operation since Uruguay in 2002, aside from Mexico's long-standing swap line, dating to the 1940s and now sized at $9 billion.

Pakistan narrowly avoided default in 2023 with a $3 billion IMF standby deal and later secured a $7 billion Extended Fund Facility, but its reserves still depend on official financing, rollovers and deposits from China and Saudi Arabia.

That leaves Islamabad exposed to shifts in bilateral support and IMF disbursement delays, and that vulnerability got exposed in April when Pakistan repaid about $3.5 billion, one-fifth of its reserves, to the United Arab Emirates with Saudi Arabia providing $3 billion in fresh support.

Pakistan's central bank said in January that reserves could return to near their 2021 record, reaching $20 billion by the end of 2026.

US exchange stabilization facility would carry weight as both a liquidity backstop and political signal, easing pressure on reserves and the Pakistani rupee, while reducing the South Asian country's dependence on IMF tranches and ad hoc rescues.

IMF-backed reforms have stabilized the economy at a political cost, including higher taxes, spending restraint and limited room for development or welfare spending.

Global ratings agency Fitch said in April that Pakistan's adherence to its IMF programme has supported the country's funding capacity, while rebuilt foreign exchange buffers provide a cushion against economic shocks from the Middle East conflict.

But deeper constraints remain. Fitch cautioned that rising energy costs and potential supply disruptions could sharply erode the country's foreign exchange reserves.

Foreign investment in Pakistan has remained thin, deterred by recurring external crises, policy uncertainty, security risks, past profit-repatriation curbs and a narrow export base, while the country's credit rating remains deep in speculative-grade territory, keeping borrowing costs high and market access limited.

Pakistan has sought to use its ties to the Trump administration to address some of these issues, with economic cooperation that has so far spanned crypto, real estate and mining.

Pakistan has signed a stablecoin agreement for cross-border payments with an affiliate of World Liberty Financial, the main crypto business of President Donald Trump's family, pursued a memorandum of understanding to redevelop the closed PIA-owned Roosevelt Hotel in New York with the US government, and courted US mining investment, including in Reko Diq, where the US Export-Import Bank has announced $1.2 billion in financing. Reuters
Id like to use the biting the wall emoji Face Banging Against Wall (Google version)- but alas we dont have it.
 
27000 even better , or , you don't consider retired fauji as Pakistani citizens..... corporate tax is about 35% , and all ff businesses pay that tax and sales tax where applicable..... let's accept your are right and there's no tax on dividend income of FF ....why shall any business be a victim of double taxation let alone a foundation whose goal is welfare ? NOTE....only 20% of fauji foundation employees are retired fauji

@hydrabadi_arab Sb. said FF pays tax like every other company. You're now admitting its dividend income is tax free but calling that fair. Pick a defence..!!

When an ordinary Pakistani owns FFC shares, he pays tax on the dividend he receives... When Fauji Foundation receives the same dividend, it pays nothing, because parliament wrote it into the tax exemption list, and when a super tax came, FF went to court to avoid that too. ...

The 35 percent company tax changes nothing, FFC would pay that no matter who owned it, so the army owning it adds nothing extra to the treasury, it only removes the dividend tax the rest of us would have paid...

And your own 20 percent figure sinks you..... it means 4 out of 5 people working at FF are civilians, not retired soldiers.... So the "soldiers' welfare organisation" is really just a big business group where soldiers are a small minority of staff, enjoying a charity's tax break....
 
@hydrabadi_arab Sb. said FF pays tax like every other company. You're now admitting its dividend income is tax free but calling that fair. Pick a defence..!!

When an ordinary Pakistani owns FFC shares, he pays tax on the dividend he receives... When Fauji Foundation receives the same dividend, it pays nothing, because parliament wrote it into the tax exemption list, and when a super tax came, FF went to court to avoid that too. ...

The 35 percent company tax changes nothing, FFC would pay that no matter who owned it, so the army owning it adds nothing extra to the treasury, it only removes the dividend tax the rest of us would have paid...

And your own 20 percent figure sinks you..... it means 4 out of 5 people working at FF are civilians, not retired soldiers.... So the "soldiers' welfare organisation" is really just a big business group where soldiers are a small minority of staff, enjoying a charity's tax break....
Honestly bro , you are arguing just for the heck of it... silly arguments and silly points scoring....I declare you the winner...stay safe.
 
Honestly bro , you are arguing just for the heck of it... silly arguments and silly points scoring....I declare you the winner...stay safe.

No points scoring, just the tax code, the clawback list and your own numbers..... Appreciate the concession though.... Take care.
 
Which bank do the doctors own, which gas major do the bureaucrats hold 40 percent of?
One of my transactions was stuck through WU. I sent it to Habib Bank. I inquired with WU that HB hasn't received the money. They replied that all international transactions go to Askari Bank, which then forwards them to the respective banks, so it is a matter between them and HB.

Anyway, there is a huge imminent wheat shortage. The flour mill owners cum parliament/provincial members cum touts will now sell 4500 per sack while they bought it for 2800. All thanks to -----
 
@kambhakt @hydrabadi_arab

Then why is Pakistan seeking 10 billion from the USA and 6.7 billion from SA.

I suspect it is to address tenure mismatch. Replace short-term debt with long-term funds. As long as the cost of facility isn't higher and the total debt doesn't go up, nothing to be bothered about.

Regards
 
Our corrupt political leaders such a President Zardari and Prime Minister Sharif are billionaires with stolen money from national exchequer. While the corrupt Panama ki Rani is now CM of Punjab.
Our corrupt politicians are nobodies without our military establishment's giving them a free-hand. The real culprit is the mil-establishment.
 
US should know that we take loan and then we continue to request rollover for 30 years. So it’s not 5 years, it’s the start of never ending rollovers…

We already have too many loans. Most of which was unnecessary… so we must try to fix our economy rather than short term solutions of borrowing money from friends of Pakistan.
Pakistan needs external resources as much as possible. No money, no honey, just day dreaming.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


vs

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



Also.. I think it is not shared

 
Last edited:
WASHINGTON:
Pakistan has asked the United States for a $10 billion exchange stabilisation facility, according to a source briefed on the matter, which, if approved, could provide a lifeline for the cash-strapped South Asian economy.


The request, which is being reported for the first time, follows Pakistan's role in brokering talks over the Iran war, which raised its diplomatic profile and stirred hopes that it could seek economic gains from Washington and other partners.

In the request to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Islamabad is seeking a Bilateral Exchange Stabilization Support Facility between the US and the Pakistani government worth $10 billion with maturity of up to five years.

The facility, if agreed to, would bolster Pakistan's reserves, ease pressure on the rupee and reduce its reliance on multilateral financing, even as Islamabad undertakes tighter fiscal and monetary policies in line with its International Monetary Fund programme.

Pakistan remains under $7 billion IMF discipline that has required politically unpopular tax increases, spending restraint and reforms.

Pakistan's finance ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters request for comment outside of Asia business hours. The US Treasury also did not immediately respond to request for comment.

Exchange stabilization facilities are rare US Treasury backstops, usually routed via the Exchange Stabilization Fund, that provide dollars, swaps or guarantees to support reserves and steady currencies.

These facilities are different from the permanent standing dollar swap lines that the US Federal Reserve has with some major central banks and acts as an international supply line of US dollars to underpin financial stability.


A 2025 Argentina package was the first new foreign-government exchange stabilization facility operation since Uruguay in 2002, aside from Mexico's long-standing swap line, dating to the 1940s and now sized at $9 billion.

Pakistan narrowly avoided default in 2023 with a $3 billion IMF standby deal and later secured a $7 billion Extended Fund Facility, but its reserves still depend on official financing, rollovers and deposits from China and Saudi Arabia.

That leaves Islamabad exposed to shifts in bilateral support and IMF disbursement delays, and that vulnerability got exposed in April when Pakistan repaid about $3.5 billion, one-fifth of its reserves, to the United Arab Emirates with Saudi Arabia providing $3 billion in fresh support.

Pakistan's central bank said in January that reserves could return to near their 2021 record, reaching $20 billion by the end of 2026.

US exchange stabilization facility would carry weight as both a liquidity backstop and political signal, easing pressure on reserves and the Pakistani rupee, while reducing the South Asian country's dependence on IMF tranches and ad hoc rescues.

IMF-backed reforms have stabilized the economy at a political cost, including higher taxes, spending restraint and limited room for development or welfare spending.

Global ratings agency Fitch said in April that Pakistan's adherence to its IMF programme has supported the country's funding capacity, while rebuilt foreign exchange buffers provide a cushion against economic shocks from the Middle East conflict.

But deeper constraints remain. Fitch cautioned that rising energy costs and potential supply disruptions could sharply erode the country's foreign exchange reserves.

Foreign investment in Pakistan has remained thin, deterred by recurring external crises, policy uncertainty, security risks, past profit-repatriation curbs and a narrow export base, while the country's credit rating remains deep in speculative-grade territory, keeping borrowing costs high and market access limited.

Pakistan has sought to use its ties to the Trump administration to address some of these issues, with economic cooperation that has so far spanned crypto, real estate and mining.

Pakistan has signed a stablecoin agreement for cross-border payments with an affiliate of World Liberty Financial, the main crypto business of President Donald Trump's family, pursued a memorandum of understanding to redevelop the closed PIA-owned Roosevelt Hotel in New York with the US government, and courted US mining investment, including in Reko Diq, where the US Export-Import Bank has announced $1.2 billion in financing. Reuters

Terrible state of affairs. Pakistan has no intention of changing its ways. Bad news for the people of Pakistan.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
@kambhakt @hydrabadi_arab

Then why is Pakistan seeking 10 billion from the USA and 6.7 billion from SA.

I suspect it is to address tenure mismatch. Replace short-term debt with long-term funds. As long as the cost of facility isn't higher and the total debt doesn't go up, nothing to be bothered about.

Regards
Give the monkeys onions and have fun 😊
 
Why are they Pakistanis in financial crisis? They have been in crisis for decades 😡 . Is there too many people working in bureaucracy and heavy inflation I do not understand. This US loan is not helping a country, he’s helping GHCQ/ SHARIF Zardari etc. it feels like Trump and his cronies who probably have a significant financial interest in keeping Mr Sharif Zardari and GHCQ in power.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top