Pakistan seeks $10b in US backstop facility

Let's say Pak gets on its feet and somewhat starts crawling.
I mean we are on our feet, let's not over exaggerate, we are not South Sudan or Burundi...
Our debt to GDP falls to (say 50%) and growth rate to 4-5 (not much).
As it is said that the West feels at ease dealing with/controlling the deep state (a single person essentially) compared to the parliament, what other fears or disadvantages would the West have?
This logic is actually flawed, the reason people buy into this is the Zia era and the money bags back then, western nations especially in Europe have been most supportive of the democratic process inside Pakistan and engaging with elected governments -however we must at some point learn to understand that we are an Asian nation with very different internal dynamics pretending to playhouse with a western system of governance with Islamic overtones.

No one shoe fits all feet sizes, alas discussing this problem at length would completely derail this discussion and take it into the realm of politics and history - and we don't need any more history lessons in our lives. :ROFLMAO:
Like a strong Pakistan disturbs the US West Asia policy (in what terms, alliances? ) Or would China have its feet in the Arabian Sea and thus compete with the US there?
A strong Pakistan disturbs certain entities closer in proximity to us than those sitting thousands of miles away. Yes, there is no doubt that there is a desire to see a Pakistan that remains pliable and easier to mold, but it is not limited to how the west see's us or wishes to see us. China has been a boon to Pakistan, an actual partner in development, but there are limits to what China can do, it too is suffering from a slowdown in the property market and economic challenges.
All that if the design you mean is external.
Design is not just external bahi, again we have a habit in our society - we always like to pin the blame on others and never take any collective responsibility. All this started with our elders, it is a trickledown effect, this system you see in Pakistan wasn't propped up overnight.
I agee with the rest of the comment. Besides some misadventures by Mushi and NRO, it was JF17, Agosta, HEC, Telecom, Media, Al Kahlid, Suparco funds, IST, etc.
JF17 was a success story for Pakistan, the real problem is what happened to our provinces post 2010? Why does no one ever talk about that?
 
Last edited:

141 million people in Middle East facing food insecurity, IMF says :coffee:

Those on the breadline tell 'The National' they have changed eating habits to keep from going hungry

More than 141 million people in the Arab world are exposed to food insecurity, the managing director of the International Monetary Fund, Kristalina Georgieva, said in Riyadh on Monday, as the organisation approved a new food shock borrowing window for vulnerable countries. :coffee:

Ms Georgieva said that 48 countries around the world are particularly exposed to the food crisis, as Russia’s invasion of Ukraine chokes crop supplies.

"Of the 48 countries, about 10-20 are likely to be asking (for emergency assistance)," she said. ☕

The IMF will add its voice to fight food trade restrictions in order to ease the situation and plans to fund the food shock window using last year's Special Drawing Rights allocations. the window will be open for a year for countries with urgent balance of payment needs that "are suffering from acute food insecurity, a sharp food imports shock, or from a cereals export shock." ☕

The IMF did not mention any specific countries that would be eligible for low-condition emergency loans under the new window.

Fadhel Kaboub, Associate Professor of Economics at Denison University, Ohio and president of the Global Institute for Sustainable Prosperity told The National the IMF could do more than just add its voice to fight food trade restrictions.

“The IMF doesn't need to add its voice to these calls, instead it can put its money where its mouth is. The IMF can increase SDR allocations for short term relief to help vulnerable countries cope with rising food and energy prices. The IMF can drop its absurd demands to make IMF loans conditional upon cuts in food and fuel subsidies and other austerity policies that force millions of people below the poverty line.”

 
Let's say Pak gets on its feet and somewhat starts crawling. Our debt to GDP falls to (say 50%) and growth rate to 4-5 (not much).
you need to export to get there. what is that you plan to export?
 
WASHINGTON:
Pakistan has asked the United States for a $10 billion exchange stabilisation facility, according to a source briefed on the matter, which, if approved, could provide a lifeline for the cash-strapped South Asian economy.


The request, which is being reported for the first time, follows Pakistan's role in brokering talks over the Iran war, which raised its diplomatic profile and stirred hopes that it could seek economic gains from Washington and other partners.

In the request to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Islamabad is seeking a Bilateral Exchange Stabilization Support Facility between the US and the Pakistani government worth $10 billion with maturity of up to five years.

The facility, if agreed to, would bolster Pakistan's reserves, ease pressure on the rupee and reduce its reliance on multilateral financing, even as Islamabad undertakes tighter fiscal and monetary policies in line with its International Monetary Fund programme.

Pakistan remains under $7 billion IMF discipline that has required politically unpopular tax increases, spending restraint and reforms.

Pakistan's finance ministry did not immediately respond to Reuters request for comment outside of Asia business hours. The US Treasury also did not immediately respond to request for comment.

Exchange stabilization facilities are rare US Treasury backstops, usually routed via the Exchange Stabilization Fund, that provide dollars, swaps or guarantees to support reserves and steady currencies.

These facilities are different from the permanent standing dollar swap lines that the US Federal Reserve has with some major central banks and acts as an international supply line of US dollars to underpin financial stability.


A 2025 Argentina package was the first new foreign-government exchange stabilization facility operation since Uruguay in 2002, aside from Mexico's long-standing swap line, dating to the 1940s and now sized at $9 billion.

Pakistan narrowly avoided default in 2023 with a $3 billion IMF standby deal and later secured a $7 billion Extended Fund Facility, but its reserves still depend on official financing, rollovers and deposits from China and Saudi Arabia.

That leaves Islamabad exposed to shifts in bilateral support and IMF disbursement delays, and that vulnerability got exposed in April when Pakistan repaid about $3.5 billion, one-fifth of its reserves, to the United Arab Emirates with Saudi Arabia providing $3 billion in fresh support.

Pakistan's central bank said in January that reserves could return to near their 2021 record, reaching $20 billion by the end of 2026.

US exchange stabilization facility would carry weight as both a liquidity backstop and political signal, easing pressure on reserves and the Pakistani rupee, while reducing the South Asian country's dependence on IMF tranches and ad hoc rescues.

IMF-backed reforms have stabilized the economy at a political cost, including higher taxes, spending restraint and limited room for development or welfare spending.

Global ratings agency Fitch said in April that Pakistan's adherence to its IMF programme has supported the country's funding capacity, while rebuilt foreign exchange buffers provide a cushion against economic shocks from the Middle East conflict.

But deeper constraints remain. Fitch cautioned that rising energy costs and potential supply disruptions could sharply erode the country's foreign exchange reserves.

Foreign investment in Pakistan has remained thin, deterred by recurring external crises, policy uncertainty, security risks, past profit-repatriation curbs and a narrow export base, while the country's credit rating remains deep in speculative-grade territory, keeping borrowing costs high and market access limited.

Pakistan has sought to use its ties to the Trump administration to address some of these issues, with economic cooperation that has so far spanned crypto, real estate and mining.

Pakistan has signed a stablecoin agreement for cross-border payments with an affiliate of World Liberty Financial, the main crypto business of President Donald Trump's family, pursued a memorandum of understanding to redevelop the closed PIA-owned Roosevelt Hotel in New York with the US government, and courted US mining investment, including in Reko Diq, where the US Export-Import Bank has announced $1.2 billion in financing. Reuters


Aren’t we tired of this? How many more years will Pakistan keep running on borrowed money while the people suffer? The establishment and every government that comes and goes still haven’t learned that you can’t keep borrowing endlessly without sinking the entire country deeper into crisis.

Pakistan’s Total public debt is between US$345–350 billion dollars.

This is the real number not just external loans, but domestic borrowing, government‑guaranteed debt, circular debt, and liabilities stacked across every institution. We’re not just in trouble; we’re drowning.

Pakistan’s external debt alone is around $130 billion, but internal debt is even bigger. The state borrows from local banks just to pay interest on previous loans. It’s a loop with no exit, and everyone knows it.

And let’s be honest, a lot of people don’t take this seriously simply because they don’t live in Pakistan. It’s easy to talk casually about “reforms” when you’re not the one paying insane electricity bills or watching your currency collapse. Others don’t bother presenting solutions because they already know the establishment won’t implement anything. They’ve seen decades of the same pattern survival through loans, not through governance.

Every time Pakistan goes back to the IMF, China, the Gulf states, or Western lenders, our negotiating power shrinks. We don’t walk in with a plan; we walk in with desperation. The IMF has already imposed harsh conditions: higher taxes, subsidy cuts, restructuring of state‑owned enterprises, and strict fiscal discipline. These aren’t just policy points; they hit ordinary Pakistanis in electricity bills, fuel prices, and daily inflation.

Some people fear that one day Pakistan might be forced to hand over its nuclear arsenal. Right now, there is no evidence that the IMF or Western governments have ever tied nuclear disarmament to financial assistance. Ukraine and Iran’s situations were geopolitical, not IMF‑driven. Pakistan’s nukes are not part of any loan negotiation.

But the real danger is something else, losing economic sovereignty. Becoming a country that survives only by borrowing from one power to pay back another. A nation whose decisions are shaped not by its people, but by its creditors.

How long will the establishment keep choosing short‑term fixes over real reform? How long will Pakistan keep going to the West, China, and Arab countries with the same bowl in hand? At some point, the world will stop bailing us out and then what?
 
Last edited:
This is great. Pakistan’s Total public debt is between US$345–350 billion. Establishment and government wants to make sure we cross 500 billion dollars before 2030.

Pakistan might become a trillion dollar economy after all, just not in the way economists usually mean.
 
Brokerage fee is required , situation is worsening.

Pakistan's FDI falls to lowest since 2023 amid tax policy concerns​


Pakistan’s foreign direct investment inflows have fallen to the lowest since 2023, as business leaders complain of erratic tax policies driving away business.
Data released on Friday showed a 34 per cent decline in year-on-year investment, with just $1.64 billion net trickling into the country of 250 million people over the past 12 months.

Major multinational companies have packed up since an economic crisis in 2022, including Procter & Gamble Co., the world’s largest consumer goods maker, which indirectly created thousands of jobs in Pakistan, and Telenor ASA, a top taxpayer which invested $2 billion over two decades, both at the end of last year.

TotalEnergies SE, Shell Plc, and Uber Technologies Inc. have also departed, while other foreign companies, including Microsoft Corp., which spent a quarter century in the capital Islamabad, have handed over to local partners or scaled back operations.


Caught between pressure from the International Monetary Fund to increase revenue and a large populace unable or unwilling to pay income taxes, Pakistani authorities have long resorted to squeezing companies. Businesses in the country currently pay up to 44 per cent tax, made up of a baseline corporate tax rate of 29 per cent and a basket of add ons that include employee protection funds and a progressive super tax.

The super tax, imposed on the highest-earning businesses, was first introduced as a one-off emergency tax but was repeatedly extended. A legal challenge against it earlier this year failed, although the government slightly reduced the rate in the latest budget.

“Pakistan is a significant outlier, and it is paying the price,” Pakistan’s Chamber of Commerce said in a statement in May. The corporate tax rate exceeds the 20 per cent rate imposed in Thailand and Vietnam.

Telenor and Shell declined to comment, while Procter & Gamble, Uber and TotalEnergies did not respond to requests. Microsoft said that they changed their operating model in Pakistan as a part of a “regular process of business evaluation and optimization”.

Khurram Schehzad, adviser to Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, said the exits are due to companies changing their global strategies. He added that there have been 79 new foreign entrants between 2023-2025, compared with 19 exits.

Still, total FDI inflows remain low, at a moment when Pakistan is enjoying one of its strongest diplomatic positions in years.

Islamabad helped to broker peace talks between the US and Iran, building on a warming relationship with US President Donald Trump. The government has seized on the chance to court investment in mining, oil and crypto. Meanwhile Pakistan’s closest allies have signaled some confidence in the market. Saudi Arabian Oil Co. has taken a stake in a local energy provider and Chinese companies meanwhile are behind the largest share of foreign investment, boosted by the arrival of electric vehicle makers including BYD Co.

Pakistan's key weakness remains its reliance on imports, particularly for energy, leaving it dangerously exposed.

A crushing economic crisis in 2022 — fueled by political chaos and compounded by a global energy price shock — brought the nation close to bankruptcy, as the currency lost almost half its value and foreign reserves plummeted to critically low levels.

Bailouts by the IMF in the following years supported by loans from friendly countries helped to stabilize the economy. Along with the financial aid came the need for economic austerity and high taxes.

The pharmaceutical sector has been particularly badly hit by a wave of exits by foreign manufacturers, according to Ayesha Tammy Haq, the executive director of Pharma Bureau, the representative body of multinational pharmaceutical companies. She said policy uncertainty created a “trust deficit” between company executives and the government, compounded by weak enforcement of intellectual property laws that allow low quality, copy-cat drugs to flourish in the market.


There’s a lot of people who cannot get their medicines now because they’re just not available in Pakistan,” she said in an interview. “We have become reliant on imports.

In the meantime, Pakistan’s external account is instead kept relatively healthy by remittances from overseas Pakistanis, which reached a record $41.6 billion in the last fiscal year which ended in June, accounting for more than 9 per cent of GDP. That cash flow has long outpaced exports which have barely moved from around $30-$32 billion and dwarfs FDI.

Critics say the cushion provided by remittances reduces the pressure on policymakers to make tough decisions for the long-term economic sustainability of the country, such as export and FDI growth.


Javed Kureishi, the CEO of Pakistan Business Council, a business policy advocacy group, said the latest FDI figures are “extremely disappointing” and described new entrants replacing departing foreign companies as something “you can’t celebrate”.

“MNCs need stable policies,” he said. "The wrong policy is better than constantly changing policies."

https://www.business-standard.com/w...-amid-tax-policy-concerns-126072300419_1.html
 
Last edited:
Brokerage fee is required , situation is worsening.

Pakistan's FDI falls to lowest since 2023 amid tax policy concerns​


Pakistan’s foreign direct investment inflows have fallen to the lowest since 2023, as business leaders complain of erratic tax policies driving away business.
Data released on Friday showed a 34 per cent decline in year-on-year investment, with just $1.64 billion net trickling into the country of 250 million people over the past 12 months.

Major multinational companies have packed up since an economic crisis in 2022, including Procter & Gamble Co., the world’s largest consumer goods maker, which indirectly created thousands of jobs in Pakistan, and Telenor ASA, a top taxpayer which invested $2 billion over two decades, both at the end of last year.

TotalEnergies SE, Shell Plc, and Uber Technologies Inc. have also departed, while other foreign companies, including Microsoft Corp., which spent a quarter century in the capital Islamabad, have handed over to local partners or scaled back operations.


Caught between pressure from the International Monetary Fund to increase revenue and a large populace unable or unwilling to pay income taxes, Pakistani authorities have long resorted to squeezing companies. Businesses in the country currently pay up to 44 per cent tax, made up of a baseline corporate tax rate of 29 per cent and a basket of add ons that include employee protection funds and a progressive super tax.

The super tax, imposed on the highest-earning businesses, was first introduced as a one-off emergency tax but was repeatedly extended. A legal challenge against it earlier this year failed, although the government slightly reduced the rate in the latest budget.

“Pakistan is a significant outlier, and it is paying the price,” Pakistan’s Chamber of Commerce said in a statement in May. The corporate tax rate exceeds the 20 per cent rate imposed in Thailand and Vietnam.

Telenor and Shell declined to comment, while Procter & Gamble, Uber and TotalEnergies did not respond to requests. Microsoft said that they changed their operating model in Pakistan as a part of a “regular process of business evaluation and optimization”.

Khurram Schehzad, adviser to Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, said the exits are due to companies changing their global strategies. He added that there have been 79 new foreign entrants between 2023-2025, compared with 19 exits.

Still, total FDI inflows remain low, at a moment when Pakistan is enjoying one of its strongest diplomatic positions in years.

Islamabad helped to broker peace talks between the US and Iran, building on a warming relationship with US President Donald Trump. The government has seized on the chance to court investment in mining, oil and crypto. Meanwhile Pakistan’s closest allies have signaled some confidence in the market. Saudi Arabian Oil Co. has taken a stake in a local energy provider and Chinese companies meanwhile are behind the largest share of foreign investment, boosted by the arrival of electric vehicle makers including BYD Co.

Pakistan's key weakness remains its reliance on imports, particularly for energy, leaving it dangerously exposed.

A crushing economic crisis in 2022 — fueled by political chaos and compounded by a global energy price shock — brought the nation close to bankruptcy, as the currency lost almost half its value and foreign reserves plummeted to critically low levels.

Bailouts by the IMF in the following years supported by loans from friendly countries helped to stabilize the economy. Along with the financial aid came the need for economic austerity and high taxes.

The pharmaceutical sector has been particularly badly hit by a wave of exits by foreign manufacturers, according to Ayesha Tammy Haq, the executive director of Pharma Bureau, the representative body of multinational pharmaceutical companies. She said policy uncertainty created a “trust deficit” between company executives and the government, compounded by weak enforcement of intellectual property laws that allow low quality, copy-cat drugs to flourish in the market.


There’s a lot of people who cannot get their medicines now because they’re just not available in Pakistan,” she said in an interview. “We have become reliant on imports.

In the meantime, Pakistan’s external account is instead kept relatively healthy by remittances from overseas Pakistanis, which reached a record $41.6 billion in the last fiscal year which ended in June, accounting for more than 9 per cent of GDP. That cash flow has long outpaced exports which have barely moved from around $30-$32 billion and dwarfs FDI.

Critics say the cushion provided by remittances reduces the pressure on policymakers to make tough decisions for the long-term economic sustainability of the country, such as export and FDI growth.


Javed Kureishi, the CEO of Pakistan Business Council, a business policy advocacy group, said the latest FDI figures are “extremely disappointing” and described new entrants replacing departing foreign companies as something “you can’t celebrate”.

“MNCs need stable policies,” he said. "The wrong policy is better than constantly changing policies."

https://www.business-standard.com/w...-amid-tax-policy-concerns-126072300419_1.html

Yes saaaar. Happy days for Hindustan.
 
Apparently, having dissent, political parties and an independent judiciary is now considered a weakness 😂

Saaaar, do not point out Indian weakness. India has jero weakness. Only Pakijtan has many weakness. India always winner! Kashmir coming back to India and Balochistan gaining independence! Jai Hind! 🫠
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top