brazensword
Registered Member
Beyond the threat of escalation and the usual economic matters, why Fatah 1 only?
Purely strategic / tactical question.
Purely strategic / tactical question.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Basically same as sea carriers similar number of aircrafts ready any moment for action and heavily protected from areal threats, i think you already use something like that otherwise i do not see how else you would manage to scramble dozens of your own fighters to fend off numerically superior force and inflict loses to them.How's the land carrier thing work?
With being underground you can have multiple exists and tunnels can go for miles, which negates the impact of strikes.
Basically same as sea carriers similar number of aircrafts ready any moment for action and heavily protected from areal threats, i think you already use something like that otherwise i do not see how else you would manage to scramble dozens of your own fighters to fend off numerically superior force and inflict loses to them.
Because Pakistani Cruise missiles are treated as strategic systems and are used for nuclear delivery (Pakistani military has advertised it as such many times) so using strategic systems will be very high up on the escalation ladder and can be easily misinterpreted.First question I want to start with why did we not see stocks of cruise missiles used?
View attachment 119609
Honestly everything did well. Except for one.
Air Defence failed overall. I get that our air bases are closer to the border overall but life is not fair and preparations have to be made accordingly.
Either increase the number and variety of air defence units, or start building underground/mountain air bases, or do both. Sargodha at least should not have taken any hits.
In Bholari why weren't all personnel in trenches/bunkers when they knew other bases have been struck?
We also need something better than the CM-400 for our JF-17s. Longer range and faster flying.
Saab 2000 was damaged though
I have been saying this for the past 4 years about the underground/mountain air bases. People used to laugh at me when I said it.Either increase the number and variety of air defence units, or start building underground/mountain air bases, or do both.
How many F-16 do we have? 75?There's going to be a lot of ifs when it comes to PAF... What if Pakistan's F-16 fleet were all block 52s (block 52's are not considered as advanced when compared to Rafail) how much worse would IAF performed? No doubt Pakistan has the better pilots by far and are the jewel of Pakistan's military I just hope the deal with Orange man is to upgrade PAF F-16 fleet to V standard.
We need to go over our air defenses with an eye towards the munitions India is likely to use, and not so much the Jets. Loitering munitions will only increase and we need relatively simple AA guns linked to modern AESA radars and EO/IR systems as well as anti-drone drones to knock them out. All modestly priced but highly effective, as Ukraine has shown. The Turks, in NATO, can brief us on what nato has found worked and didn’t work in Ukraine.Army has already done 9/10 on Chinese SAM , expand network
Perhaps more Turkish SAM to Supplement Chinese (Low-Med-High) Systems
Few more Turkish , Akinc (Drones ) , can Air to Air Pakistani SAM be placed on these ? Hypothetical question . Can K-8 have small air to air missiles ? for Hunting the smaller drones ?
May be CWIS like system for Land or Mobile Truck
First question I want to start with why did we not see stocks of cruise missiles used?
View attachment 119609
Idk how well Subsonic Cruise missiles would do these days. Especially over flat terrain where they can't use mountains and the geography to hide. Maybe in a saturation attack it can get through. Perhaps they felt other platforms were better suitable for what they wanted to do, like the fatah 2 ballistic missile.
Only if you aquire twin seated long endurance stealth aircrafts, once the birds are in air they need time do the job and if you wish to broaden your offensive options with those stealth airplanes against targets deeper in enemy teritory and need safer location then yes build it but it is expensive and cherry on top of the cream, i would keep insisting on enhancing density, sweetness and texture of cream for while, so use your limited money on doctrine that you mastered to enhance, once with stronger economy go for it.Understand the Pakistan’s forward airbases are close to the border which are at risk of enemy’s strikes.
In addition, Pakistan has air bases towards the West. Hence, is there a need to add more bases in remote parts of Balochistan, KP, Gilgit Baltistan?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.