POST WAR assessment of recent conflict.

[SiliconBit (silicon0000)]

What I've been seeing in this thread is people trying to prove or disprove each other's claims. While discussing this is appropriate here, I believe there should also be discussions on topics beyond these traditional comparisons.

Given the ongoing tensions and the war scenario of an Indo-Pak conflict in May 2025, the conversation in this thread could greatly benefit from moving beyond traditional military comparisons to explore the potential role of advanced technologies in this specific context. Instead of solely focusing on traditional things, we could examine how the following domains might manifest in such a conflict:

• Electronic Warfare (EW): How might both sides leverage spectrum dominance to disrupt communications, radar systems, and potentially even drone operations? What electronic countermeasures could be deployed, and what would be the strategic impact of gaining or losing control of the electromagnetic spectrum in a localized conflict?
• Cyber Warfare Dimensions: What critical infrastructure – power grids, communication networks, financial systems, military command and control – might be targeted by cyber operations from either side? What offensive and defensive cyber capabilities could realistically be deployed, and what would be the potential escalation risks and strategic consequences in a short-term conflict scenario?
• The Role of Space Warfare Assets: How reliant are both India and Pakistan on space-based assets for intelligence gathering, satellite communication, and GPS navigation relevant to a potential conflict? What counter-space capabilities, even rudimentary ones, might be considered, and what would be the implications for terrestrial operations?
• Coordinated Networked Warfare: To what extent have India and Pakistan developed the ability to integrate their various military branches – army, navy, air force – through sophisticated data networks? How might this networked capability influence battlefield coordination, information sharing, and the speed of decision-making in a localized conflict?
• Air Defense Systems: How would advance air defense systems, including integrated networks of radars, surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) of varying ranges, and potentially even use of electronic warfare, play a crucial role in a May 2025 Indo-Pak conflict? How effective might these systems be against advanced fighter jets, cruise missiles, and drones? What electronic warfare tactics might be employed to degrade or neutralize these defenses, and what would be the strategic implications of achieving air superiority or even local air dominance?
• The Use of Other Advanced Technologies: Considering the current technological landscape of the May 2025 conflict, what specific advanced technologies – such as advanced drones (beyond basic reconnaissance or kamikaze drones), precision-guided munitions, or early stages of AI-assisted targeting – might realistically see deployment by either side in this conflict? What would be their tactical impact?
• Possible Technology Use Cases and Future Implications for Indo-Pak Conflicts: Even within the timeframe of a potential May 2025 conflict, what nascent technologies or novel applications of existing technologies might emerge? How could the lessons learned from such a conflict shape the future technological development and military doctrines of both nations in the years to come?

I would like to request that defense experts and those with Think Tank affiliations or actual experience in defense industries share their views with us.

Someone please tag these experts so that people like us can learn new things through this forum.

 

[Baibers_1260]

If your takeaway is that Pakistan failed to inflict damage simply because India says it intercepted “everything,” then that is an extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary evidence. Let’s be honest — no modern air defense system has ever demonstrated a 100% interception rate in real-world combat, let alone under saturation conditions.Furthermore, if you genuinely believe this sets a precedent for safe nuclear conflict, then that logic undermines every doctrine of deterrence developed since the Cold War. Even the U.S. and Russia — with the most advanced systems — operate under Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), acknowledging no defense is absolute.
Pakistan’s second-strike capability via cruise missiles, MIRVs, and mobile platforms is well documented and publicly acknowledged by international defense analysts. No credible strategist — Indian or foreign — argues that Pakistan lacks retaliatory capability.
So no, nuclear war isn’t “safe,” not for India, not for Pakistan, not for anyone.

Najam,
I was trying to elicit an informed response above and beyond the unsubstantiated hype. Air defenses against missiles and drone attacks have proven imperfect in the other theaters of war currently being waged around the globe.
Examples:
- Both Russia (with S-400) and Ukraine ( with Patriots ) despite having advanced air defense systems have not been able to achieve a 100% success rate in interception of missiles
- The missile exchanges between Israel and Iran ( and Lebanon) have shown that missile attacks are difficult to stop.
- Even with the best anti-missile defenses some Houthi launched anti-ship missiles have slipped through though with minor damage.
In this context the claims and counterclaims of the missile exchanges between India and Pakistan are significant:
(a) Pakistan acknowledges damage to its air bases and civilian population centers from India launched missile and drone strikes and there are third party satellite imagery to confirm these.
(b) India on the other hand officially claims 100% interceptions of all missiles and drones launched by Pakistan. In support of India's claim there is very little evidence to show Pakistani missiles successfully hit any targets. If true then 100% interceptions is an unparalleled feat not achieved by any other nation in the world.

Conclusion:
If the evidence is true, then India can safely fight a nuclear war since all missiles can be intercepted

 

[najamiqbal]

Najam,
I was trying to elicit an informed response above and beyond the unsubstantiated hype. Air defenses against missiles and drone attacks have proven imperfect in the other theaters of war currently being waged around the globe.
Examples:
- Both Russia (with S-400) and Ukraine ( with Patriots ) despite having advanced air defense systems have not been able to achieve a 100% success rate in interception of missiles
- The missile exchanges between Israel and Iran ( and Lebanon) have shown that missile attacks are difficult to stop.
- Even with the best anti-missile defenses some Houthi launched anti-ship missiles have slipped through though with minor damage.
In this context the claims and counterclaims of the missile exchanges between India and Pakistan are significant:
(a) Pakistan acknowledges damage to its air bases and civilian population centers from India launched missile and drone strikes and there are third party satellite imagery to confirm these.
(b) India on the other hand officially claims 100% interceptions of all missiles and drones launched by Pakistan. In support of India's claim there is very little evidence to show Pakistani missiles successfully hit any targets. If true then 100% interceptions is an unparalleled feat not achieved by any other nation in the world.

Conclusion:
If the evidence is true, then India can safely fight a nuclear war since all missiles can be intercepted

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Appreciate the structured comparison, but I’d like to point out that the claim of 100% interception success isn’t supported by evidence — and that matters greatly in strategic terms. Pakistan has acknowledged specific damages, and there is verifiable third-party satellite imagery confirming those impacts. On the Indian side, there were videos — including one showing a failed interception or mid-air missile malfunction — that briefly circulated online before being rapidly scrubbed from platforms. The removal itself raises questions about selective visibility and information control. Globally, no military — not the U.S., Israel, Russia, or Ukraine — has ever demonstrated perfect interception, despite superior systems like Iron Dome or Patriot. To claim such perfection under real combat stress without transparent verification borders on strategic mythology rather than operational fact. If India indeed intercepted every missile with 100% efficiency, it would represent a historically unprecedented capability. But until independently verified, such a claim lacks credibility — and shouldn't be used as the basis for theorizing about survivability in a nuclear exchange, where even a single missile breach can have catastrophic consequences.

 

[najamiqbal]

I think a better scale of prosperity is the Per-Capita GDP . India's per Capita GDP is one-fourth of Mexico. India has the unfortunate distinction of having one of highest hunger index in the world with 78% child malnutrition, and the largest population of illiterates, beggars, lepers, and blind.

India’s aspirations for global power are undermined by its own systemic contradictions. A true superpower doesn’t rely on exporting its brightest minds to sustain another country’s innovation engine. The fact that India’s top graduates from IITs line up for H1B visas reflects a talent drain — not national strength.Until domestic opportunities match the hype, and until India retains and utilizes its human capital rather than exporting it to Silicon Valley, the “superpower” label will remain aspirational.Moreover, a functional economy isn’t defined by the number of coders in global outsourcing firms. It's measured by innovation, productivity, equity, and internal capacity to generate wealth. A cheap labor-based services model may lift GDP numbers, but it doesn't equate to strategic independence or economic resilience.India’s future strength depends on fixing its foundations, not chest-thumping over borrowed success.

 

[Bratva]

Congratulations. Our air defenses intercepted Fatah 2 missiles fired at Delhi. There is a 100% interception rate of all missiles and drones, something not even Israel fending off Iranian attacks , or Ukraine fending off Russian attacks has achieved. I think India should be able to win a nuclear war in Round 2

Either you are lying or Colonel Sofia Qureshi is lying when she said there was harm and damage to bases and personnel?

 

[Michael]

I would like to request that defense experts and those with Think Tank affiliations or actual experience in defense industries share their views with us.

Your request is extravagant and unrealistic.
No country is going to publicize its true strengths in these areas. They either don't talk, or they talk nonsense, but they certainly don't tell the truth.
As for think tanks, they do the same. Either they don't talk or they talk nonsense.

But, if you are really interested, you can try to follow their performance in these areas in the civilian market.

For example:
If a certain country is very advanced in the civilian electronics field and in the communications field, then it certainly won't be bad in the military field. Conversely, if a country claims to be very good in the military sector, but the civilian sector is all run or supplied by foreign companies, that's classic bluffing.

 

[Great Mal]

I, personally asked the same at the time, and the lack of evidence provided made me doubt it..

in 2019, both the MKI and F-16 kills were BS from both sides

and history has sorta repeated itself here again, no evidence of either Rafale or J-10/17 etc being downed.

There is clear proof of 3 fighter jets downed in India mainly Mirage 2000, Rafale & Mig 29. The crash at Ramban is unkown due to no closeup images of it as the area was cordoned off before any civil could get there.

But some reporter did get a video of its stab section likely being another Mig 29 or Su-30 mki.

3 are confirmed by visual evidence which was floating online i have personally compiled it from the days of the incidents as well.

 

[Sharma Ji]

There is clear proof of 3 fighter jets downed in India mainly Mirage 2000, Rafale & Mig 29. The crash at Ramban is unkown due to no closeup images of it as the area was cordoned off before any civil could get there.

But some reporter did get a video of its stab section likely being another Mig 29 or Su-30 mki.

3 are confirmed by visual evidence which was floating online i have personally compiled it from the days of the incidents as well.

be very hard to hide in India

i'm still jotting it down to enemy propaganda

those few pics would not qualify as submissible in any court of fair inquiry.

 

[Developereo]

If a certain country is very advanced in the civilian electronics field and in the communications field, then it certainly won't be bad in the military field. Conversely, if a country claims to be very good in the military sector, but the civilian sector is all run or supplied by foreign companies, that's classic bluffing.

Is it always true?

The USSR wasn't exactly known for top-tier consumer electronics, but their military tech was taken seriously by the US.

Consumer tech and military tech have different requirements: civilian tech must work reliably day in day out requiring little maintenance in exchange for reduced performance, but military tech can be short lived, even single use, and require high maintenance to give maximum performance.

 

[Great Mal]

be very hard to hide in India

i'm still jotting it down to enemy propaganda

those few pics would not qualify as submissible in any court of fair inquiry.

lmao they aren’t pics stop coping. There are videos from Bhatinda with various angles of the Rafale exploding in air then falling down where indian farmers are seen strolling around the wreckage.

The mirage 2000 in Pampore was recorded by a local as well who went to the crash site & started recording.

Mig-29 near akhnoor was recorded by Indian soldiers.

Did we forget how Indian officials picked up farmers in Bhatinda and asked them to delete their videos or how PunjabTv was forced to delete their image of the serial number of Rafale.

Pakistan did some blunders in this skirmish but we certainly aren’t bad of liars as the Indians

 

[TAC]

I, personally asked the same at the time, and the lack of evidence provided made me doubt it..

in 2019, both the MKI and F-16 kills were BS from both sides

and history has sorta repeated itself here again, no evidence of either Rafale or J-10/17 etc being downed.

OMG are u people for real? ‘No evidence that of either Rafale or J10/17 etc being downed’ I keep telling u guys to start a coping thread & then u can share all this BS on it with your pals who are also in cope mode same as 2019

 

[Burhaan7487]

Key point at 53 mins in on tactical lessons for Pakistan

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[TAC]

lmao they aren’t pics stop coping. There are videos from Bhatinda with various angles of the Rafale exploding in air then falling down where indian farmers are seen strolling around the wreckage.

The mirage 2000 in Pampore was recorded by a local as well who went to the crash site & started recording.

Mig-29 near akhnoor was recorded by Indian soldiers.

Did we forget how Indian officials picked up farmers in Bhatinda and asked them to delete their videos or how PunjabTv was forced to delete their image of the serial number of Rafale.

Pakistan did some blunders in this skirmish but we certainly aren’t bad of liars as the Indians

There is no point reasoning with these people. What happened is too much for them to live with so they choose not to see it and they won’t. Note that other active Indian members who were foaming at the mouth over the thought of India getting even for 2019 have disappeared altogether.

 

[Sharma Ji]

OMG are u people for real? ‘No evidence that of either Rafale or J10/17 etc being downed’ I keep telling u guys to start a coping thread & then u can share all this BS on it with your pals who are also in cope mode same as 2019

aapko mil gai evidence, aap full khush ho...

buss, what else...

you gots my aashirwaad, khush raho

 

[Michael]

Is it always true?

The USSR wasn't exactly known for top-tier consumer electronics, but their military tech was taken seriously by the US.

Consumer tech and military tech have different requirements: civilian tech must work reliably day in day out requiring little maintenance in exchange for reduced performance, but military tech can be short lived, even single use, and require high maintenance to give maximum performance.

Your use of the Soviet Union/Russia as an example just illustrates my point.

They have never been particularly focused on the electronics industry. Their civilian electronics field was terrible, and likewise their military electronics field was terrible. ------ That's not to say that they were completely lacking, but that their capabilities in that field were not commensurate with their national status.

However, their industrial technological capabilities are not weak. The flood of steel during the Soviet era shocked the world. Even now, with their overall poorer economy, they still have some industrial technological capability.
To this day, Russia still has an independent aviation industry. They are able to independently manufacture both military aircraft and civilian airliners. Their automotive industry still exists independently. They still have an independent shipbuilding industry.

Their military and civilian communications networks are fully autonomous, and their space industry remains well-established. In these areas, they are free from the influence of any country.

Of course, I am only saying that they exist independently and not evaluating whether they are advanced or not. In contrast, many countries may be more “advanced” than Russia in these areas, but they are dependent on other powers.