Prof Yunus seeks Pakistan’s support to revive Saarc

Can Pakistan and Bangladesh overcome historical grievances to redefine relations?

For India, Pakistan and Bangladesh's defence cooperation is reason for concern. The long, porous border between India and Bangladesh, along with New Delhi's historical position as a vital supporter of Dhaka, make any reconciliation between Islamabad and Dhaka a sensitive matter. The weapons agreement, in particular, has fuelled suspicion in India about a potential shift in Bangladesh's outlook, particularly in light of the anti-India rhetoric that surrounded the protests that led to Hasina's removal.

By Waleed Sami Sep 26, 2024

346045d2c37663832ed7be83f7d094d8d779265dca3f6199.jpg

Sheikh Hasina's exit from Bangladesh's political scene, following 15 years of tense ties with Pakistan, is a watershed moment for South Asia. For more than a decade and a half, Pakistan-Bangladesh relations were strained by distrust, historical grievances, and India's rising influence in Dhaka during Hasina's Awami League administration. With a new interim government in place, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, Islamabad sees a chance to restore relations with Dhaka. However, as this new chapter progresses, the complexity of the past, regional geopolitics, and Bangladesh's internal political dynamics will all influence the future of this partnership.

A Tumultuous History: The Shadow of 1971

To appreciate the tense ties between Pakistan and Bangladesh during Sheikh Hasina's reign, one needs to review the 1971 events. The conflict that resulted in Bangladesh's independence remains a source of deep historical pain. Sheikh Hasina, the daughter of Bangladesh's founding father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, incorporated the scars of the violent battle into her political agenda. Her term in power, from 1996 to 2001 and again from 2009 to 2024, was distinguished by an unwavering attitude against Pakistan, which she considered accountable for the 1971 crimes.

From Pakistan's perspective, the events of 1971 are a terrible part of its history that it recognises but does not believe should define future ties. Islamabad has frequently emphasised the need to move beyond the animosity of the war, emphasising that both countries suffered during the fight. Nonetheless, Hasina's government's political murders of Pakistani elites throughout the conflict further widened the split. Under her leadership, Dhaka remained strongly allied with New Delhi, stifling any substantial development in bilateral relations with Pakistan.

Hasina’s Departure: A Window for Reconciliation?

The political turmoil that resulted in Sheikh Hasina's fall in August 2024, following huge student-led demonstrations, provides Pakistan with an opportunity to reset its ties with Bangladesh. With Muhammad Yunus at the helm of the interim administration, Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif lost no time in reaching out for collaboration. In a phone conversation with Yunus, Sharif stressed Pakistan's intention to increase commerce, cultural exchanges, and people-to-people interaction between the two countries.

For Pakistan, this change in leadership might signal the start of a thaw in long-frozen ties. The absence of Hasina, widely seen in Pakistan as a staunch supporter of India, provides an opportunity for Islamabad to engage Dhaka without the historical baggage that has weighed down previous diplomatic efforts. While the change in leadership may provide a chance for reconciliation, the path to normalising relations will be riddled with difficulties.

The India Factor: A Delicate Balancing Act

India's influence is one of the major hurdles to improving Pakistan-Bangladesh ties. Under Sheikh Hasina, Bangladesh's foreign policy was closely linked with that of New Delhi, reflecting a shared history and strategic cooperation. India had an important part in Bangladesh's independence and continues to have a considerable impact on Dhaka's domestic and foreign affairs.

In the post-Hasina period, anti-India sentiment has grown in Bangladesh, as seen by the student demonstrations that helped overthrow her administration. Many Bangladeshis, notably followers of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and Jamaat-e-Islami have long criticised Hasina for being too close to New Delhi and allowing India undue influence over the country's politics and economy. While its primary goal is to restore order and resolve internal concerns, the new temporary administration must tread gingerly.

For Pakistan, prevailing anti-India sentiment provides a potential chance to re-establish relations with Bangladesh. However, Islamabad must exercise caution in not focusing its diplomatic efforts primarily on its competition with India. While shared cultural, religious, and historical links between Pakistan and Bangladesh provide a solid framework for better relations, any overt anti-India stance might backfire, especially given India's strategic importance to Bangladesh.

Defense Deal and Regional Implications

One of the interesting developments in the post-Hasina era has been the defence agreement between Bangladesh and Pakistan. According to reports, Dhaka placed a large purchase for artillery ammunition and explosives from Pakistan barely weeks after forming the interim administration. This agreement, while not exceptional, indicates a potential shift in Bangladesh's security posture and raises concerns about its larger geopolitical consequences.

For India, Pakistan and Bangladesh's defence cooperation is reason for concern. The long, porous border between India and Bangladesh, along with New Delhi's historical position as a vital supporter of Dhaka, make any reconciliation between Islamabad and Dhaka a sensitive matter. The weapons agreement, in particular, has fuelled suspicion in India about a potential shift in Bangladesh's outlook, particularly in light of the anti-India rhetoric that surrounded the protests that led to Hasina's removal.

While it is too early to conclude whether Bangladesh is altering its strategic alignment away from India, the weapons contract with Pakistan indicates Dhaka is looking at a review of old ties. For Pakistan, this is a promising sign that Bangladesh is eager to interact more openly, but Islamabad must move with prudence and avoid steps that may spark a regional backlash.

Building on Common Ground

To improve ties with Bangladesh, Pakistan would be wise to focus on areas of mutual advantage rather than controversial geopolitical problems. Trade and economic cooperation provide a clear avenue for both nations to strengthen ties. Bangladesh's economy has expanded dramatically in the last decade, and Pakistan may gain from increasing trade with Dhaka, notably in textiles and other major industries.

Cultural exchanges and human-to-human interactions are equally vital. During Sheikh Hasina's reign, visa restrictions and the suspension of direct flights significantly restricted engagement between Pakistanis and Bangladeshis. Resuming flights, relaxing visa requirements, and encouraging cultural diplomacy through collaborative media ventures, youth exchanges, and academic cooperation might all contribute to the rebuilding of confidence and goodwill.

Furthermore, Pakistan must recognise Bangladesh's sovereignty and status as an independent nation. While the two nations have a shared past, Pakistan should approach its relationship with Bangladesh with humility, acknowledging the grave scars of 1971 while looking to the future.

Opportunity for Pakistan

The post-Hasina period provides Pakistan with a great chance to re-establish its ties with Bangladesh. With Muhammad Yunus running an interim administration, there is anticipation in Islamabad that Dhaka would be more willing to cooperate than it was under Sheikh Hasina. However, the complexity of regional geopolitics, notably India's influence, will continue to define the future of Pakistan-Bangladesh ties.

For both countries, the key to establishing a long-term partnership is to prioritise common interests—trade, culture, and people-to-people ties—rather than allowing historical grievances or regional rivalries to dominate the discussion. If Islamabad and Dhaka can overcome these hurdles, the next chapter in Pakistan-Bangladesh relations might be one of collaboration and mutual respect, as opposed to the anger and distrust that have marked the last 15 years.

(The author is a postgraduate student of Strategic Studies at the Centre for International Peace and Stability (CIPS), a school of the National University of Science and Technology (NUST), Islamabad. Views are personal. He can be reached at [email protected] )

Read more at: https://www.southasiamonitor.org/in...come-historical-grievances-redefine-relations
 
Its interesting to observe a nominated leader of a nation in tatters thinking of reviving a defunct regional group instead of the nation he's heading
 
Lol, go ahead and have some 😃. I watch Indian news when I need a good 😃.

 

A New Pakistan-Bangladesh Nexus, Spurred By China, Could Spell Trouble For India​

Jaideep Mazumdar
Sep 27, 2024

A-New-Pakistan-Bangladesh-Nexus-Spurred-By-China-Could-Spell-Trouble-For-India-09-28-2024_07_1...png

  • Bangladesh’s new Pakistan alliance, spurred by China, signals troubling times ahead for India’s strategic interests and regional stability.
A new nexus between Bangladesh and Pakistan is emerging on the horizon, and it does not bode well for India.

After the fall of the Sheikh Hasina government, Bangladesh has started gravitating towards Pakistan. Pro-Pakistani elements in the country’s bureaucracy, civil administration, armed forces and civil society as well as the pro-Pakistani Islamists in Bangladesh have started steering the country close to Pakistan.

A manifestation of this grand project to bring Bangladesh close to its erstwhile ‘enemy’ was the meeting between the head of Bangladesh’s interim regime, Mohammad Yunus, and Pakistan Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif at the UN headquarters in New York earlier this week.

Yunus embraced Sharif, thus creating history. Ever since the formation of Bangladesh in 1971, no Bangladeshi leader has ever embraced a Pakistani leader in public, and that too so warmly.

Sharif and Yunus reportedly discussed steps that would be taken to bring their two countries close to each other. Yunus also used his meeting with Sharif to send out a hostile message to India: he called for the revival of South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC).

New Delhi has sidelined SAARC, which includes Pakistan, over the latter’s export of terror to India. Instead, India has floated new regional groupings like BBIN (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal) that exclude Pakistan.

A call for revival of SAARC by Yunus in the presence of Sharif was definitely an unfriendly act meant to rile India and please Pakistan.

Sharif, on his part, underlined the importance of reviving ties with Bangladesh and called on Yunus to “open a new page” in bilateral relations. The two also pledged to “enhance cooperation in various aspects”.

The Yunus-Sharif bonhomie has been supplemented by calls from some prominent Bangladeshis —former diplomats, retired army officers, academics and others — who are close to the present regime for establishing military ties with Pakistan.

Pro-Pakistani Islamists in Bangladesh, especially the Jamaat-e-Islami Bangladesh, have always stood for close ties with Pakistan. Sheikh Hasina kept these elements at bay. But after her downfall, they have reared their heads and are actively working towards allowing Pakistan to re-establish its presence in Bangladesh.

According to Indian strategic analysts, China is playing a critical role in nudging Bangladesh towards establishing good relations with Pakistan.

After Sheikh Hasina’s ouster, China has been able to increase its influence in Bangladesh, especially in the country’s foreign policy and security establishments.

“Over the years, China has successfully wooed and created a powerful lobby within Bangladesh’s armed forces, bureaucracy, foreign ministry and civil society. This lobby is now actively collaborating with the pro-Pakistani elements within the country to forge close bonds with Pakistan, a client state of China,” said a retired diplomat who served in a senior position in the Indian High Commission a decade ago.

It is, he added, in China’s interests to bring Dhaka and Islamabad close to each other. “Close Bangladesh-Pakistan ties will help Pakistan regain the influence in Bangladesh that it lost after Sheikh Hasina returned to power in January 2009,” he said.

Under military rulers and also when the BNP (Bangladesh Nationalist Party) was in power in Bangladesh, Pakistan’s ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence) played an active role in sponsoring anti-Indian activities in Bangladesh.

The ISI aided, armed and trained militant outfits of North East India who were provided shelter in Bangladesh. Sheikh Hasina put a stop to all that by dismantling the ISI network in her country and banishing Indian militants from Bangladeshi soil.

“Islamabad is, once again, salivating at the prospect of using Bangladesh to carry out anti-Indian activities. While militancy in North East India is all but dead, Pakistan hopes to use radical Islamist groups and Islamic terror groups in Bangladesh to create trouble in India. Pakistan feels that the porous India-Bangladesh border can be easily used to push in well-trained terrorists into India,” said Major General (retired) S K Gupta. He had served in Assam during the height of ULFA (United Liberation Front of Asom) militancy there.

China will be a major beneficiary of another front opening up against India. Close Dhaka-Islamabad ties automatically translates into Pakistan regaining its influence in Bangladesh.

China already has a lot of leverage over Bangladesh, and if it manages to embed its client state (Pakistan) in Bangladesh one again, it can look forward to India-Bangladesh ties entering stormy waters.

“Such a prospect will benefit China because India will have to deal with another unfriendly neighbour to its east. Even if Indo-Bangladeshi ties remain overtly cordial, close Bangladesh-Pakistan bonds will automatically translate into Pakistan playing mischief and encouraging anti-Indian forces in Bangladesh. Pakistan is, after all, viscerally anti-Indian. It will definitely not shy away from once again using Bangladesh to carry out anti-Indian activities,” said the former army officer.

Why Close Ties Between Bangladesh And Pakistan Are Unnatural

Decades of repression, persecution and exploitation of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) by West Pakistan, capped by the horrific genocide carried out by West Pakistani army and their Islamist collaborators on East Pakistanis in 1971 led to a fierce war that led to the liberation of East Pakistan and formation of Bangladesh.

Pakistan’s refusal to acknowledge the war crimes and apologise for them, as well as the collective trauma of millions of Bangladeshis who suffered terribly under the West Pakistani regime, had bedevilled ties between the two countries.

However, after gaining Independence in 1971, Bangladesh under Sheikh Mujibur Rahaman had failed to purge pro-Pakistani elements from its bureaucracy, armed forces and civil society. It did not act decisively against the Jamaat-e-Islami which collaborated with the genocidal West Pakistani regime.

As a result, these elements reared their heads after the assassination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahaman in August 1975. Bangladesh’s successive military juntas even rehabilitated the assassins of Rahaman and forged close relations with the very country (Pakistan) which had massacred millions of Bangladeshis.

The BNP which ruled the country from 1991 to 1996 and again from 2001 to 2006, also maintained close relations with Pakistan and allowed Pakistan to foment trouble against India from Bangladesh’s territory.

Now again, with Sheikh Hasina ousted from power, pro-Pakistani elements have gained ground in Bangladesh. Not only have they become powerful once again, they have launched concerted attempts to rewrite the country’s history by watering down the liberation war and whitewashing the war crimes committed by the West Pakistani forces in 1971.

In light of Bangladesh trying to forge close ties with Pakistan at Beijing’s behest, India has no option but to remain vigilant and send a clear message to Dhaka that it should not allow use of its territory for any anti-Indian activity.

 
Both are getting bankrupt these days. India would probably want to stay away than giving the benefit of trade to such neighbors. Pakistan and Bangladesh should take the lead and see who wants to be part of saarc without India.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top