PTI freedom movement against Judiciary and Establishment: News, Discussion & Updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Een khatoon ka bhee Eye-Checkup kar wa dou.

B.C. - something in the water at Adiala?

Baqi prisoners ke Eye-Sight theek hain...?
Side effects of black magic she did for Imran Khan.
Oh bhai, don't speak about her like that. Apparently she is a "Mother" figure for the masses.
 
Apparently, Bughz-e-Imranis are the only ones literally obsessed with Imran Khan’s wives, already starting with his first wife; Jemima Khan. 🙄
[Daikha..., kaisay aey (bhagay-douray) apni naee AmmA ko defend karnay...]

How did the 2nd one pan out for ya'll...?

She was quite a saint, huh...

B6Wdia4CYAA0sw_.jpg
 
How did the 2nd one pan out for ya'll...?
You just proved me right about Bughz-e-Imranis having a literal obsession with ALL of Imran Khan’s wives, starting with his first wife from the time when Imran Khan hadn’t even entered in Pakistani politics yet:
Apparently, Bughz-e-Imranis are the only ones literally obsessed with Imran Khan’s wives, already starting with his first wife; Jemima Khan. 🙄
 
That’s rich coming from the supporter of Amma of Punjab (Maryam Nawaz)
a. I hate that creature...just as much as the next guy.
...obsession with ALL of Imran Khan’s wives, starting with his first wife.
b. Truth be told - I never had an issue with that lady. To date, she's a respectable individual. She raised 02 sons (on her own) when dad was busy getting married - back-to-back.

Give IK a chance & he'll surly go for #4 & i'll bet you'll be the 1st one to start hating on the current one.

Khair..., I f#*k care about his wives.

Good Luck to Cyclops.

I mean Peerni.
 
Apparently, Bughz-e-Imranis are the only ones literally obsessed with Imran Khan’s wives, already starting with his first wife; Jemima Khan. 🙄

Masallah the leader of Ummah married in a pro Israel jewish khandaan then angrazi british Pakistani then jaado gharni.
 
I have mentioned Imran Khans faults as well countless times and see him as the lesser evil. Military has caused countless losses and disappointment.

Army supporters blindly follow whichever COAS comes along. It is not military job to understand foreign policy. They take an oath to not meddle on political affairs and they take this oath in front of a massive bust of the Quaid.

You guys are just going in circles repeating same old narritive.
You cant call any of us Fauji cult since we dont cry when ever COAS retires or passes away. God forbids if IK dies, his cult followers are going to burn down entire nation as per their track record.
 
The "lesser" evil actually lost half of the country (East Pakistan), the only job it was constitutionally hired to do (protect country’s borders) and actually got away with it. 🙄

Lets talk about east. Do you seriously think it was a good idea to include east Pakistan with west? Do you think it was logically possible to keep east Pakistan even if Imran Khan was in power since 1947? It seems like you guys dont even consider Indian threat in your assessment.
 
Lets talk about east. Do you seriously think it was a good idea to include east Pakistan with west? Do you think it was logically possible to keep east Pakistan even if Imran Khan was in power since 1947? It seems like you guys dont even consider Indian threat in your assessment.

If we respected them and treated them equally in the federation it could have worked, but we'll never know. We treated them like dogs and the breaking point came when Mujib demolished all West Paksitani politicians in elections and then did not get his due. In history we blame Bhutto for this, but Bhutto bhi eik army planted politician tha and Yahya did not do much to stop him.

I have enough elders who were serving in the 60s and 70s to know this. Some who paid price and stayed back as PoW. We were racist to them, we didn't kill no 3 million bengalis but there exists a literal colony in Bangladesh where you can find bastard children of lighter skin. You get the idea.

Jab iss tarah se racism karo ge phir East Wing kaise bachna tha.
 
You guys are just going in circles repeating same old narritive.
You cant call any of us Fauji cult since we dont cry when ever COAS retires or passes away. God forbids if IK dies, his cult followers are going to burn down entire nation as per their track record.

Fauj supporters are a massive cult. Just because its not tied to one person doesn't mean its not a cult. Nowhere else in the world do you see people support their military being present in all areas of life and civil admin.

Even actual cults have change of leadership as time goes on. What is your point?

In fact, this cult regularly produces movies, TV shows and music videos to increase its appeal. It also has businesses and owns massive swathes of lands (not for military purpose). It's spokesperson regularly goes to universities to indoctrinate kids into thinking that, speaking against Pak army = being anti-national.

Am I wrong, tell me honestly? List one country that is ruled by its military and could at least be compared to 1st world nations. Burma? North Korea? Egypt? Any come to mind at all?

Even if I accept your stance 100% that IK is a cult leader then so what. He'll be dead in less than 15 years. His cult goes with him. What about this one that has no end?
 
Last edited:
What a clear example of cultism - if someone wants to go and see those five points I posted this is 3 out of those 5 being activated because they could not negate the earlier ones due to a lack of intellectual response capacity.

You people really do think politics is just performance art. One minute you mock “boot polishing,” the next minute you are inventing fairy tales about “balanced foreign policy” from a movement that treated slogans as strategy and delusion as statecraft.

Saudi Arabia is actually the perfect example of why your argument is childish. Trump can brag that MBS was “kissing his ass,” and it still does not change the fact that Saudi Arabia deals with the US from a position of wealth, leverage, arms purchases, energy influence, and strategic importance. That is the difference between a country that can absorb rhetoric and still extract value, and a country whose economy keeps colliding with reality and ends up back at the IMF.

That is what makes the PTI version of “independence” so embarrassing. It is not sovereignty because it is emotional cosplay for people who want to feel proud without doing the hard work of building actual national capacity. You cannot posture as some great anti-imperial force while depending on creditors, external bailouts, and fantasy economics to keep the lights on but go on with the "grape Khan" butt kissing while projecting it one everyone else.

So no, the issue is not whether Trump might one day mention Pakistan in some degrading way. With Trump, humiliation is just part of the package. The real question is whether a country is strong enough to still get something out of the relationship. Saudi can. Pakistan, in its current condition, cannot pretend that chest thumping is a substitute for leverage.

This is where the cultism comes in PLAIN AND CLEAR.
Because at some point facts stop mattering to you people entirely. The movement gives you a script such as “boot polishers,” “slaves,” “imported regime,” “real freedom” and then you all repeat it to each other like a prayer until the slogans themselves become a substitute for thought.

Internal contradictions do not matter.
Failed predictions do not matter.
Economic reality does not matter.
The only thing that matters is whether the line flatters the group’s identity and you all can go 69 on each other constantly.

What PTI sold people was not strategic autonomy and instead was narcissism dressed up as nationalism, marketed to a political fanbase that now behaves less like citizens and more like a belief community. That is why every debate with you folks feels pointless because you are arguing with people who do not want coherence, only reinforcement.

Today I learned anyone that doesn’t want Pakistan to be referred to as “ass kissers” make them a cultist.

you can’t make this up lol
 
If we respected them and treated them equally in the federation it could have worked, but we'll never know. We treated them like dogs and the breaking point came when Mujib demolished all West Paksitani politicians in elections and then did not get his due. In history we blame Bhutto for this, but Bhutto bhi eik army planted politician tha and Yahya did not do much to stop him.

I have enough elders who were serving in the 60s and 70s to know this. Some who paid price and stayed back as PoW. We were racist to them, we didn't kill no 3 million bengalis but there exists a literal colony in Bangladesh where you can find bastard children of lighter skin. You get the idea.

Jab iss tarah se racism karo ge phir East Wing kaise bachna tha.

Yep I too have elders in my family who served. Most don’t speak about those times at all. The little info we have got will give you chills. Unfortunately seems we never learned from our mistakes given the rhetoric on here
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top