PTI freedom movement against Judiciary and Establishment: News, Discussion & Updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Deema Anjuman is just interested in Corruption,
women, viagra and his property abroad in
Australia.

Only reason he is holding on to power is because
he is behind the murder of Arshad Sharif Shaheed.
He knows once he is removed from power then that
rope will be around his neck.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Qasim Munir's (Asim Munir's bro) aide Usman Qayyum is involved in sexual harassment. Nadeem is also alleged to have many extramarital affairs.
I think in future, if only Qasim can also be arrested like Faiz
Who cares then why soldiers die?
 
I gave myself 5 minutes to think about what we will discuss in this thread.

Nadeem Anjum is incompetent… okay..

What next?

I think this thread is only created army-bashing as members would have no idea about what to discuss. A post was enough if you wanted to discuss an opinion of the retired general.

PS: I watched the video twice, didn’t find what’s written in the first post. So I am going to lock this thread
 
Nadeem Anjum is stepping down. The ISI command in KPK has been changed, with the Sector Commander and Sub-Sector Commander in Peshawar both replaced. Several more changes are in the pipeline for Punjab, Balochistan, and Sindh. MI officers are being appointed as Sector Commanders in ISI. The new Sector Commander for KPK, Brigadier Umar, was previously the Survey Commander for MI in KPK and has now taken over the ISI position.
 
This man need to be punish he is hurting army more then fools in GHQ
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last week you opened a thread titled, DG ISPR to announce troops for Palestine and Occupied Kashmir.....is this another one of your predictions !!!
 
I am sad once pride of Pakistani nation ISI is being humiliated😥
 
Last week you opened a thread titled, DG ISPR to announce troops for Palestine and Occupied Kashmir.....is this another one of your predictions !!!
That was sarcastic as we knew what is going to say as we knew he will act as politician in uniform
 
On September 9th, a tragic event took place in Pakistan that has shaken the foundations of its democratic system. Armed men, wearing masks, stormed the country's parliament and attacked the building, resulting in the kidnapping of several members of parliament (MPs) from the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. This act of violence has been described as a black day for the country’s democratic values. According to eyewitness accounts, the attackers entered the parliament building with weapons and took control of the situation. They targeted PTI lawmakers specifically, abducting some of them in a shocking display of force. This unprecedented event has raised serious concerns about the safety of elected representatives and the state of democracy in Pakistan. Parliament is meant to be a place where political debates and decisions are made peacefully, representing the voice of the people. An attack like this, right at the heart of the nation’s political system, is a direct blow to the democratic process. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has condemned the attack, stating that it goes against the core principles of democracy. The use of violence to silence or intimidate elected representatives is a dangerous trend that threatens the very fabric of the country’s political system. For a country that has faced challenges to its democracy over the years, this attack is a disturbing reminder of the risks that remain. Many political commentators and civil society members have expressed concern that this incident is part of a broader pattern of political instability and violence in the country. They warn that if such actions go unchecked, it could lead to further erosion of trust in democratic institutions. The attack also highlights the growing political tensions in Pakistan. PTI, led by Imran Khan, has been at odds with several other powerful entities in the country, including the military, judiciary, and political opponents. This tension has been building for some time, and the attack on parliament may be a reflection of these deeper conflicts. There is a need for all political parties to come together to address these tensions and ensure that violence does not become a common tool for settling political disputes. In the aftermath of this attack, there is a call for stronger measures to protect elected representatives and ensure the safety of the country’s democratic institutions. This event has shown that more needs to be done to safeguard the political system from violence and intimidation. The attack on September 10th is a reminder that democracy in Pakistan must be protected at all costs. It is a time for unity and for all political actors to work together to ensure that such events do not happen again. Pakistan’s democratic future depends on the strength of its institutions and the commitment of its people to uphold democratic values. This tragic day will be remembered as a dark moment in Pakistan's political history, but it also serves as a call to action to strengthen democracy and prevent future attacks on its institutions.
 
Which part of parliament did the attackers burn?

Where is the evidence of damages?

Did they also burn the statues of Quaid or Liaquat Ali Khan?

If no damage was caused then how is it an attack to the parliament?

The most I see is the violation of law to arrest the alleged culprits? The culprits must be arrested and trialled/punished.

Imagine Taliban enter the parliament building, would you say that the military action to get rid of terrorists is an attack on the parliament?

I condemn the 9th September incident but it wasn’t an attack on the parliament but the parliamentarians
 
Which part of parliament did the attackers burn?

Where is the evidence of damages?

Did they also burn the statues of Quaid or Liaquat Ali Khan?

If no damage was caused then how is it an attack to the parliament?

The most I see is the violation of law to arrest the alleged culprits? The culprits must be arrested and trialled/punished.

Imagine Taliban enter the parliament building, would you say that the military action to get rid of terrorists is an attack on the parliament?

I condemn the 9th September incident but it wasn’t an attack on the parliament but the parliamentarians
If the Speaker denies giving permission for police or military forces to enter Parliament on the Parliament floor, it means that any entry by such forces would be unauthorized. According to Pakistan’s Constitution (Article 66) and Rules of Procedure (Rule 18), without the Speaker’s approval, their presence would violate the law protecting Parliament’s sanctity. This denial would confirm that no lawful permission was granted for their entry or actions inside the Parliament. They were not terrorists.they were elected member of parliament keep in mind Brother. are you calling them terrorist?
 
This will help many to understand
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
If the Speaker denies giving permission for police or military forces to enter Parliament on the Parliament floor, it means that any entry by such forces would be unauthorized. According to Pakistan’s Constitution (Article 66) and Rules of Procedure (Rule 18), without the Speaker’s approval, their presence would violate the law protecting Parliament’s sanctity. This denial would confirm that no lawful permission was granted for their entry or actions inside the Parliament. They were not they were elected member of parliament keep in mind Brother. are you calling them terrorist.
My point is, there is a difference between

Attack on the parliament

Vs

Attack on the parliament building

Vs

Attack on the sanctity of the parliament

Vs

Attack on the parliamentarians

While I condemn them all, the nature of these attacks can vary from small violation of rules to the treason.

What you mentioned was the exaggeration and the reality is the violation of law and those who did it, those individuals must be arrested and trialed.
 
On September 9th, a tragic event took place in Pakistan that has shaken the foundations of its democratic system. Armed men, wearing masks, stormed the country's parliament and attacked the building, resulting in the kidnapping of several members of parliament (MPs) from the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. This act of violence has been described as a black day for the country’s democratic values. According to eyewitness accounts, the attackers entered the parliament building with weapons and took control of the situation. They targeted PTI lawmakers specifically, abducting some of them in a shocking display of force. This unprecedented event has raised serious concerns about the safety of elected representatives and the state of democracy in Pakistan. Parliament is meant to be a place where political debates and decisions are made peacefully, representing the voice of the people. An attack like this, right at the heart of the nation’s political system, is a direct blow to the democratic process. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has condemned the attack, stating that it goes against the core principles of democracy. The use of violence to silence or intimidate elected representatives is a dangerous trend that threatens the very fabric of the country’s political system. For a country that has faced challenges to its democracy over the years, this attack is a disturbing reminder of the risks that remain. Many political commentators and civil society members have expressed concern that this incident is part of a broader pattern of political instability and violence in the country. They warn that if such actions go unchecked, it could lead to further erosion of trust in democratic institutions. The attack also highlights the growing political tensions in Pakistan. PTI, led by Imran Khan, has been at odds with several other powerful entities in the country, including the military, judiciary, and political opponents. This tension has been building for some time, and the attack on parliament may be a reflection of these deeper conflicts. There is a need for all political parties to come together to address these tensions and ensure that violence does not become a common tool for settling political disputes. In the aftermath of this attack, there is a call for stronger measures to protect elected representatives and ensure the safety of the country’s democratic institutions. This event has shown that more needs to be done to safeguard the political system from violence and intimidation. The attack on September 10th is a reminder that democracy in Pakistan must be protected at all costs. It is a time for unity and for all political actors to work together to ensure that such events do not happen again. Pakistan’s democratic future depends on the strength of its institutions and the commitment of its people to uphold democratic values. This tragic day will be remembered as a dark moment in Pakistan's political history, but it also serves as a call to action to strengthen democracy and prevent future attacks on its institutions.

It wasn't an attack. It was staged. We know by exactly who.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top