PTI News, Updates and Discussion

Do you think PTI has a future without Imran Khan?

  • Yes

    Votes: 22 19.6%
  • No

    Votes: 80 71.4%
  • Only if senior leadership is released

    Votes: 10 8.9%

  • Total voters
    112
Status
Not open for further replies.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
FURTHER MORE I EXPECT PAKISTAN ARMED FORCES TO CRUSH EVERY ILL WISHER OF PAKISTAN AND ITS ARMED FORCES EVERY ENEMY OF THE STATE OF PAKISTAN FOREIGN ENEMY OR DOMESTIC...
THIS IS THE OATH YOU TOOK
THIS IS THE CODE YOU MUST LIVE BY
NOTHING NO LEADER NO PAKISTANI ABOVE THE STATE OF PAKISTAN...
Funny how this oath has been broken so many times we have lost count.

Why are generals above the State of Pakistan, can you explain ?

Without the capital letters please.
 
Funny how this oath has been broken so many times we have lost count.

Why are generals above the State of Pakistan, can you explain ?

Without the capital letters please.
Oops cry me a river.....
Bajwa was Khans favorite jernail?
What happened?
You must have to admit that Khan was short-sighted in this particular matter and couldn't see it coming...
 
Oops cry me a river.....
Bajwa was Khans favorite jernail?
What happened?
Is breaking the constitution and oath merely "crying in the river" ? Why does this colonial relic of army have such deep disrespect for ordinary people of Pakistan ?

Unprofessional cowardly mob pretending to be an army.
 
Trump doesnt care about Munir or Pakistan either but that's evidently beyond your capacity to understand.
Ok, so what is the trap Trump is laying for Asim Munir and Shahbaz Sharif, to bring back Imran Khan to power?
 
Last edited:
Still waiting for the trap Trump has laid out for Munir/Sharif, and how to bring back Imran Khan to power
 
But Asim Munir and Shahbaz Sharif are not the ones rotting in jail, Imran Khan is; and they didn’t ask Trump to intervene, unlike Imran Khan.
Those roles can be reversed quickly if Daddy Amreeka wishes. Its why Munir was so disturbed by Congress letter on Imran Khan's mistreatment.

This is same Munir who went for lunch with Trump, completely outside his government role and was hawking minerals to Trump. I am still trying to figure out how selling minerals is part of army chief job.
 

It’s good to actually understand what went on, without parroting Indian talking points.

China did not make a unilateral claim on the territory. The 1963 boundary agreement between Pakistan and China was peaceful, mutual, and formally signed by both governments. There was no war, no coercion, no armed conflict between the two sides over this territory.

Pakistan and China negotiated the border bilaterally and voluntarily.

Both sides agreed to demarcate their boundary to avoid disputes and strengthen relations.

The transfer of the Shaksgam Valley was done through diplomatic negotiation, not force.

Pakistan considered it a pragmatic, friendly settlement with a neighboring power.

The area was remote, uninhabited, and largely inaccessible.

Pakistan viewed the agreement as important for:

  • Strengthening strategic ties with China
  • Facilitating construction of the Karakoram Highway
  • Securing its northern frontier
  • Pakistan still emphasizes that the agreement has a clause stating it will be renegotiated if the Kashmir dispute is resolved.

Nothing like the Durand Line.
 
Those roles can be reversed quickly if Daddy Amreeka wishes. Its why Munir was so disturbed by Congress letter on Imran Khan's mistreatment.

This is same Munir who went for lunch with Trump, completely outside his government role and was hawking minerals to Trump. I am still trying to figure out how selling minerals is part of army chief job.

But what is the trap he’s laid out? Or were you speaking out from where the sun don’t shine?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top