Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably.I'd bet some "advisors" are actually on the ground fighting.
Last I checked, NATO forces are not on the ground fighting alongside the Ukes.
To be fair, many military analysts think that Ukraine's incursion into Kursk doomed Pokrovsk in the long term, because they wouldn't be able to control the area around Pokrovsk and allow the Russians to stabilize the line. And Pokrovsk should have fallen last year, around the same time now.
Again, Ukraine had not had any US support since April last year. The key for Ukraine is to hold out until 2028, when the Trump admin is voted out (Which is very likely at this point), and support from the US to resume post 2028, and if that is not achieveable (In the unlikely event GOP can hold the office of Presidency), Ukraine is to count on the European to put into speed by 2030 and beyond (that's the reason why Ukraine had sign the Rafale and Gripen deal), there are virtually no chance Russia can break Donbas by 2026, less than 10% chance for Russia to break Donbas by 2028, and if Russia can sustain their momentum, there are slightly less than half chance they can break Donbas by 2030, which mean any talk about conceding without NATO guarantee is basically pointless, because the war will go on if NATO membership or some sort of binding secuirty pact was not offered, the war is not going to stop, which mean any ceasefire in exchange of Ukrainian land is simply giving those land for free to Russia.
226 billion euros over 5 years........That may be a lot of money to buy candies, but not a lot if you are fighting a war, especially since over 60% of that money goes to the Government instead of as material support. Only 86 billion goes into military assistance.The EU has provided hundreds of billions, what are you talking about