Syrian Civil War and The future of Syria after liberation
- Thread starter The SC
- Start date
Shags101
Trusted Member
well to be fair I think it’s more they have issue with jolani and the jihadists from around the world that are now part of the Syrian army.
This incident was most likely came by chance and they fought as best they could with light arms but goes to show you i have said this before small teams with the right equipment could takeout dozens of soldiers quickly but this won’t start becoming a usual scenario jolani wont risk his it
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
Iranian Foreign Ministry: We strongly condemn the Zionist aerial and ground aggression on Beit Jan in southern Syria
The Syrian Youth Resistance against the Zionist forces is a natural and legitimate response to the aggression
The Syrian Youth Resistance against the Zionist forces is a natural and legitimate response to the aggression
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
extreme sectarian violence continues in Syria
Bharatah
SpeedLimited
Iran, Arab nations condemn Israeli military invasion of Syrian town
Iran and several other Persian Gulf nations have strongly condemned the Israeli military's recent ground and air invasion of the southern Syrian town of Beit Jinn, which resulted in the deaths of at least 13 people, including children.
In his statement on Friday night, Esmaeil Baghaei, spokesperson for the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, emphasized the inherent right of nations in the West Asia region to defend their sovereignty and territorial integrity against Israeli aggression.
He said the resistance of Syrian youth against the Israeli assailants is a natural and legitimate response to the act of aggression.
Baghaei also criticized the ongoing violations of international law by the Zionist regime, highlighting the escalating nature of its aggression in the region.
He also slammed the inaction of the UN Security Council in the face of the Israeli violations against the sovereignty and territorial integrity of regional countries, including Syria and Lebanon.
The spokesman warned that the current situation could have serious implications for global peace and stability, urging the international community to take action.
Earlier, Syria’s Foreign Ministry also denounced the Israeli attack on the Damascus suburb as a brutal massacre.
The ministry said Israeli forces resorted to indiscriminate shelling after failing to advance on the ground.
Qatar said the escalation “deepens tensions and undermines efforts to achieve security and stability in the region.”
Qatar’s Foreign Ministry called on the international community to take immediate action to stop Israeli violations, protect civilians, and hold those responsible accountable under international law.
Saudi Arabia's Foreign Ministry said that it “condemns and denounces the blatant assault” by Israeli forces in its attempts “to undermine the security and stability of Syria and its people.”
Kuwait’s Foreign Ministry also denounced the attack. “These criminal assaults are merely an extension of Israel’s destabilizing approach that threatens the security and stability of the region and undermines regional and international efforts aimed at de-escalation.”
At least 13 Syrian people, including five from one family, were killed and more than two dozen others were injured in Israeli strikes on Beit Jinn in the Damascus suburbs.
The casualties took place in a Thursday night Israeli attack by helicopters and drones on Beit Jinn after Israeli forces entered the town and were surrounded by local residents, prompting the outbreak of gunfire and confrontations.
Having been engaged in a two-hour fierce exchange of fire, the Israeli soldiers were forced to withdraw from Beit Jinn and reposition on the hill of Butt al-Warda on the outskirts of the town.
https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/...ups-condemn-Israeli-aggression-in-Syrian-town
Israeli media acknowledged that six of the regime’s forces were wounded in the armed clashes, including three seriously.
Many resistance groups have condemned Israel’s recent cowardly aggression in the Syrian town of Beit Jinn and hailed the residents’ "heroic ambush.”
eIsQengiz
Registered Member
No such group operates in southern Syria. This labelings is are merely a tactic employed by Mossad to legitimize its aggression across the border. They are not a group or foreign militia in its own right, but simply local residents from Hauran, who have endured every hardship for 14 years against Bashar's dictatorship using heavy weapons and barrel bombs from the Assad regime, yet they have survived.
Israel is attempting to gain the sympathy and loyalty of the people of Hauran, who have suffered greatly, through its carrot and stick tactics of bribery and exploitation of poverty. This, combined with hauranis relentless efforts to repel the Zionist occupation, makes them a direct target for attacks by the Zionist invaders in Southern Syria.
Last edited:
muhammed45
Elite Member
If anyone thinks that this …. gives a hoot about Islam or Muslims in general, here you are
The whole point of war on Syria is illustrated in that picture alone.
Who could have imagined one day Syria which was the sole Arab nation that never signed peace agreement with Israel makes a U-turn and enables Israel the military base of USA to bomb Qatar and Iran?
Breaking the frontline of Arabs and Muslims against the marching AngloSaxon front was the sole goal and sole point of it.
Now it must be obvious for everyone the reason behind destructions of Syria by NATO paid, funded and supported elements.
Not to mention that Syria is oil rich country and hence a priority for modern day colonizers.
The whole point of war on Syria is illustrated in that picture alone.
Who could have imagined one day Syria which was the sole Arab nation that never signed peace agreement with Israel makes a U-turn and enables Israel the military base of USA to bomb Qatar and Iran?
Breaking the frontline of Arabs and Muslims against the marching AngloSaxon front was the sole goal and sole point of it.
Now it must be obvious for everyone the reason behind destructions of Syria by NATO paid, funded and supported elements.
Not to mention that Syria is oil rich country and hence a priority for modern day colonizers.
Last edited by a moderator:
muhammed45
Elite Member
They don't need reason to invade Syria, Syria is a de facto state of Israel as of now. Its the extravagance of Zionist animals that allows them to invade and kill innocent civilians of Syria.
Syria under Assad family had always been a headache to Anglo front. Now that threat is gone and yet, Israel continues with colonizing and occupying more and more lands. While we know very well Syria is not a threat anymore to Anglo's front but guess what, Zionists in Israel don't give a damn. Their final goal is greater Israeli plan and they will do everything to achieve that goal.
Not to mention that its much more about taking revenge on Syrians.
eIsQengiz
Registered Member
The Zionist monsters attack. After Assad's flight last year and the start of Israeli incursions into the southern border city, Israel preemptively began a war to weaken the Sharaa government, launching a rapid and massive attack to destroy the old regime's military assets. The excuse of protecting the Druze community was merely a smokescreen for invading and occupying the areas adjacent to the Golan Heights.
The action was undertaken by a Zionist enemy against a Sharaa, but an established future power (the emerging power), not because of an imminent attack, but because the Jewish state fears the long-term consequences of Syria's growing power. The motivation was to prevent future inequalities by striking while the power gap was still manageable or before it shifted irrevocably in their favor.
The Syrian rebel army is consolidating its position in the south (Golan Heights). Israel feared that, if it waited, its military buildup would make a future war irretrievable.
ResurgentIran2
Registered Member
This is not about pride or sectarianism.
I (along with many others) salute those people on the ground that inflicted some hurt to the israeli terrorists. Those were locals defending their land. I dont care if they were druze, shia, sunni or christians.
We do take issue with the wahabi death squads, some of which are not native but coming from chechnya and uzbekistan, doing sectarian mass killings, not to mention killing sunni sufi scholars that reject sectarianism.
But some people are so swallowed by hate, it doesnt matter what we say, we will not convince them.
However I dont want to derail the thread. The positive news is a syrian resistance movement is being born, and I will follow events on the ground with a level of hope, even if more deaths and destruction sadly awaits. But i have no doubt Syrians themselves will liberate their land from zionist occupiers.
muhammed45
Elite Member
Talking about Jolani, he was supported by NATO countries. He hasn't shown slightest sign of resistance against Zionists. And most importantly, he was welcomed by countries like USA, Britain, Germany and other western countries.
What we saw in the recent clash, people of Syria picked up the guns and went to fight invading Zionists.
Jolani was a tools and westerners abused it well. After removing the umbrella, military bases of Syria were left bare to Zionist animals.
Maybe Jolani thought that Syria is a gift for his service to AngloSaxon front. But as we can see, Zionists won't stop at that point. Having free access to Syrian airspace, recieving gas and oil from Arab kinglets through Syria won't satisfy the beast. They want lands. Greater Israel is the true definition of Zionism in ideological sense.
While Jolani's imported terrorists from central Asia, Europe and Africa are busy with intimidating Syrians and the innocent civilians, Israel advances its sinister plans.
Now the front is Iraq, Sunnis and Shias of Iraq will unite but I don't think that would be enough to counter superior technology of Zionists provided by west.
They plan, he plans and he is the best of planners. That's why we have hope in future.
Absolutely biased and unreliable source.
unconventional
Registered Member
Question for the Jolani supporters: why is he referred as “Al-Sharaa” now, when he was referred to as “Golani” or “Jolani” before?
Why the specific rebranding?
Could it be because people don’t want to remember that Israel occupies the Golan Heights, and has occupied more territory. Whereas “Golani” instead of showing more resistance to Israel, and promising to regain the territory, is in bed with the Zionists?
Why the specific rebranding?
Could it be because people don’t want to remember that Israel occupies the Golan Heights, and has occupied more territory. Whereas “Golani” instead of showing more resistance to Israel, and promising to regain the territory, is in bed with the Zionists?
