Bharatah
Registered Member
We know that the “terrorism” of the Zionist media is in the vast majority of cases False Flag operations. The first mistake of the person who knows this information (still influenced by the media) is to think that a False Flag is a forged event, but it is not. A False Flag is a real attack; what configures a False Flag is the blame being falsely attributed to someone who is not the real guilty.
Operation false flag are operations conducted by governments, corporations, individuals or other organizations that appear to be carried out by the enemy in order to take advantage of the resulting consequences.
False Flags are generally executed by BlackOPS so that it fully appears to be a "foreign" plan, because BLACK OPS forges being from a certain culture or ideology to divert attention:
A black operation (or BLACK OPS) is a covert operation by a government, a government agency or a military organization. This may include activities of private corporations or groups. ... The main difference between a BLACK OPS and other mercenaries is that it is merely secret and that BLACK OPS involves a significant degree of diversion of attention to hide who is behind it or to make it appear that another entity is responsible (false flag operations).
There are, in reality, various types of False Flags but they will always follow a pattern :
_______________________________________________________________________________________
1. The accused culture, religion or country gains nothing from the attack
Military attacks aim at conquering power, money and geopolitics, while the false flag is a pretext for an imperial invasion. Thus, the first thing to ask is: what does the aggressor (whom the media is accusing) gain from this? What does the Islamic religion gain by bringing down a commercial building in New York on a Tuesday morning? If the answer is NOTHING, there is the first great sign of a false flag, because who profits from it is the one who is saying they are the victim, and the corporate media claim that "crazy fanatics did it" is invalid because "crazy people" do not have the emotional, structural, and financial condition to carry out attacks of such size where computers, satellites, spies and police are all deceived countless times.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
2. The narrative is ready at the moment of the attack.
War or urban crimes, corruption and drug trafficking take years to be investigated, but when a false flag occurs, on the same day an official version already appears ready for the event without any investigation, lawyer, judges, plea bargain, habeas corpus, 1st and 2nd instance, CSI or anything of the sort! Once this narrative is planted, all other opinions, questions and investigations are prohibited from airing. There is no corrupt police officer, military officer or public official who helped or allowed the event; the blame is 100% exclusively on those accused in the media who miraculously deceived everyone in times of great technological advancement. Nothing that contradicts (even slightly) the newly official version is analyzed. The case is closed shortly after the event without any more serious analysis. In the event of the bombs that exploded in Oklahoma in 1995, destroying a building (very similar to 9/11/Twin Towers), the media declared the following narrative:
New York Times (4/20/1995): “Some Middle Eastern groups have been meeting there (in Oklahoma), and the city has many Islamic temples (mosques).”
At the time they said the attack was linked to "Islamics" from the Middle East linked to Arafat and Saddam Hussein (the lies of the time); today it is known that the attack was coordinated by the American military named Timothy McVeigh.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
3. Those accused by the media narrative have public connections with secret services, political parties and/or security companies.
A key aspect that suggests a false flag is that the accused or the accused organization had or has links with secret services of the very country attacked by them! Many times the accused even appear in balaclavas or in images where you cannot see their face clearly to confuse the viewer.
Bin Laden, who was described as the world leader of "terrorism", before that was sold by the media in the 1990s (as we see in The Independent newspaper of 1993) as working side by side with the US against the Russians and being described in the report as a "peace warrior" as we see in this report from that important British newspaper of 1993. Bin Laden was declared dead without photo or video proof.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
4. A series of unanswered, confusing, strange questions emerge and are banned as "support for terrorism", "violation of national security" and "anti-Semitism".
Another characteristic of a false flag is obvious – the presence of a series of unanswered questions surrounding the occurrence. Although the media narrative that emerges shortly after the attacks ignores these flaws, they will inevitably remain for viewers who are able to think for themselves. A classic example is WTC7, the building next to the Twin Towers that also fell on 9/11, without anything hitting it, which was ignored by the media/official version at the time as if WTC7 did not exist. Ten years later they began trying to create a version to explain how that building ignored in the past fell.
A series of other strange events happen linked to a false flag:
- Change of that official version over the years
- Suspects are generally declared dead
- Disappearance of suspects' bodies
- Death of investigators of the case or of military personnel who would have killed suspects
- If there is too much disbelief about a suspect, he is swapped in the media saying it was a mistake.
en.wikipedia.org
NOTE: Many confusions of 9/11 can be explained by the fact that it was a false flag. The leaked document (from wikipedia above link) shows a plan (from 1962) by the US high military command to hijack planes and crash them into targets inside the US itself to shock the world, justifying restrictions on civil liberties and invasion of rival countries, an action identical to what occurred on 9/11 decades later.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
5. The attack always occurs in the morning.
Real military attacks are mostly carried out in the silence of the night or early morning so that the adversary is caught by surprise and does not see the attacking army's modus operandi. In a false flag the opposite happens: since the objective is to blame someone and justify actions based on that, it is (generally) done in the clear part of the day with several cameras positioned to film the event. Nero, when he made the false flag of Rome, ordered the city to be set on fire during the day to blame the Christians and justify a series of imperial political actions.
As we can see above, classical wars are done by the night but false flags in the morning.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
6. Prior knowledge, of a supposed attack, exactly as it occurred.
Another path that leads to a false flag is trying to find out if there was prior knowledge that a supposed attack could occur but that it was "impossible" to prevent. Going back in time, there was (proven) prior knowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941. As we see in rare images from the time, contrary to the current official version, everyone already knew about the Pearl Harbor event.
We see newspapers from the time warning local residents to be careful, the first "The Honolulu Advertiser" and the second "The Hilo Tribune Herald", both dated November 30, 1941, a week before the attack on Pearl Harbor.
In the book "Day Of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor", author Robert Stinnett, after 20 years of research, proves that Roosevelt knew about the event and that it was a false flag.
Note: Next to the Twin Towers there was a smaller building called WTC7; it also falls on September 11 (hours after the towers) without anything hitting it. A BBC reporter reports the fall of WTC7 hours before it actually fell because it was already in the script. If WTC7 was imploded, it is a sign that the whole operation is military because there is no way to implode a building in a single day; this is proof that weeks earlier there was a plan to destroy the entire complex with people inside the US working on it.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
7. Did a Drill happen?
Drill is an English word meaning "dry", but it is used in military jargon for military training simulations. When there is a false flag, try to research whether there was a Drill on the same day/moment or days before the event, even if it was not in the location where the supposed terrorist attack happened, because often the Drill is scheduled for a nearby location to confuse. Captain Eric H. May, former intelligence officer of the American army, stated: "The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by creating a Drill that simulates the attack you want to carry out."
If we go back in time, on 9/11, President Bush ordered 46 SIMULTANEOUS DRILLS with the "terrorist" event, which is a huge coincidence.
Author Webster Tarpley, author of Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, says that in the case of the London bombings in the 2000s, "7/7 bombings", Peter Power admitted on the radio that there was a team training to prevent terrorist attacks at the location at times close to what occurred. There were Drills in all the recent media "terrorist attacks", including: Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon, Charleston, San Bernardino, the Norway attack, the second Paris attack in 2015 and many others.
Why is a Drill scheduled to cover up a false flag?
1. Distract and remove key people from a government or policy who would not accept participating in the false flag and will be able to prove nothing because they were busy;
2. Confuse another part of the security forces that will have difficulty identifying whether the events considered "terrorist" are real or part of the training;
3. All police forces will not be able to prevent the false flag because they will be connected to the training, many even in classrooms on the same day as an attack.
4. Distract and confuse eyewitnesses, alternative media and the general public, because if someone says they saw local forces participating in the attack, the Drill will serve as an alibi for that.
5. The entire local defense system is compromised so that the false flag occurs, including computers, facial recognition, CSI, everything is allocated to the Drill training.
6. False flags in military marathons, military schools, political events, large music or sports events are common because there is already forcibly a Drill there; it is during the Drill that the false flag occurs.
# The image above from Wikipedia (from topic 6: Prior knowledge, of a supposed attack, exactly as it occurred. ) shows that the Bush administration scheduled (months in advance) military drills for September 11th, disabling American defense systems for the "drills".
_______________________________________________________________________________________
8. The official version, through the media, simulates that someone claimed responsibility.
Serial killers and mercenary groups have a tradition of claiming events to gain status; taking advantage of this: governments, secret services together with the media will simulate that someone or together with one of their BlackOps groups (ISIS, Al-Qaeda, Contras in Nicaragua) claimed authorship of the attack because this causes great impact on the viewer who does not know what a false flag is and increases popular support so that investigations do not happen.
In July 2011, an attack hit OSLO in Norway, killing 77 people and wounding more than 200. Today it is known that a Norwegian named Anders Behring Breivik was behind the attack, but that is not what was said at the moment it occurred. Exactly after the attack, newspapers from various parts of the world including the British "The Sun" said that Al-Qaeda had claimed the attack; at the time everything was Al-Qaeda because the secret services had not yet invented ISIS:
*To prove their version, the media said that Muslims "linked to Al-Qaeda" in a "Sunni forum" on the internet claimed the attack.
*And quickly it appeared in various media that Muslims claimed or claimed responsibility for the attack:.
How did a Muslim claim authorship of the attack if the Norwegian author was not a Muslim and, in fact, was against Islam? Because this "claimed" was falsified by secret services together with mercenaries. This strategy is widely used, through fake audios, internet or videos where someone appears with a black cap on their head: the person "claims" authorship to reinforce the official version and make people not believe it was a false flag.
NOTE: ISIS even claimed authorship of the CORONA VIRUS COVID 19. Showing how these black ops groups are fraudulent in their allegations.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
9. The attack only occurs once.
If we look at the RUSSIA X NATO war (which takes place in Ukraine), we see daily attacks from both sides for years, but when there is a FALSE FLAG, the attack only happens once. Strangely the so-called "security flaw" is no longer exploited by the attackers; the day after the attack all security was established (according to the media), but this is a lie. A security flaw (at a high level) would take months or even years to be fixed, and various attacks would occur on top of those security flaws. Since it is a FALSE FLAG, the attack only happens once, and from then on wars, genocides, ethnic cleansings, invasions, annexations of territories, etc. are justified.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
10. Immediate retaliation.
Political measures take years to be implemented; there are votes in political chambers, public opinion polls, analysis of situations, etc. But when there is a false flag, after the media's formation of opinion, to capitalize on fear, many of the proposed "measures" will be implemented as "emergency character" as if they were "provisional measures" that migrate to something like AI-5, Patriot Act, Nuremberg Laws, etc., where they were all created "as a reaction" to false flags. Following this we see measures creating dictatorships where an "elected" head of state migrates to intermittent power based on false flags (like Hitler in Germany), modifications or abolition of the nation's constitution, immediate invasion of certain countries rich in natural resources, etc., everything that would take years to occur happens in a matter of weeks or even days. The US, under the Bush government, invaded Iraq and Afghanistan as a "war on terror", but there is evidence that both wars were already set up before 9/11, which was the false flag pretext for these wars:
All media above are from old times, 2004, more than 20 years ago .
#The report says that days before 9/11, the decision to invade Afghanistan had already been made.
#The articles above, from the time, prove that before the towers fell on 9/11, the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan was already being planned.
# Months before "HAMAS ATTACK", Netanyahu already had a plan to a "NEW MIDDLE EAST" without palestine !
Operation false flag are operations conducted by governments, corporations, individuals or other organizations that appear to be carried out by the enemy in order to take advantage of the resulting consequences.
False Flags are generally executed by BlackOPS so that it fully appears to be a "foreign" plan, because BLACK OPS forges being from a certain culture or ideology to divert attention:
A black operation (or BLACK OPS) is a covert operation by a government, a government agency or a military organization. This may include activities of private corporations or groups. ... The main difference between a BLACK OPS and other mercenaries is that it is merely secret and that BLACK OPS involves a significant degree of diversion of attention to hide who is behind it or to make it appear that another entity is responsible (false flag operations).
There are, in reality, various types of False Flags but they will always follow a pattern :
_______________________________________________________________________________________
1. The accused culture, religion or country gains nothing from the attack
Military attacks aim at conquering power, money and geopolitics, while the false flag is a pretext for an imperial invasion. Thus, the first thing to ask is: what does the aggressor (whom the media is accusing) gain from this? What does the Islamic religion gain by bringing down a commercial building in New York on a Tuesday morning? If the answer is NOTHING, there is the first great sign of a false flag, because who profits from it is the one who is saying they are the victim, and the corporate media claim that "crazy fanatics did it" is invalid because "crazy people" do not have the emotional, structural, and financial condition to carry out attacks of such size where computers, satellites, spies and police are all deceived countless times.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
2. The narrative is ready at the moment of the attack.
War or urban crimes, corruption and drug trafficking take years to be investigated, but when a false flag occurs, on the same day an official version already appears ready for the event without any investigation, lawyer, judges, plea bargain, habeas corpus, 1st and 2nd instance, CSI or anything of the sort! Once this narrative is planted, all other opinions, questions and investigations are prohibited from airing. There is no corrupt police officer, military officer or public official who helped or allowed the event; the blame is 100% exclusively on those accused in the media who miraculously deceived everyone in times of great technological advancement. Nothing that contradicts (even slightly) the newly official version is analyzed. The case is closed shortly after the event without any more serious analysis. In the event of the bombs that exploded in Oklahoma in 1995, destroying a building (very similar to 9/11/Twin Towers), the media declared the following narrative:
New York Times (4/20/1995): “Some Middle Eastern groups have been meeting there (in Oklahoma), and the city has many Islamic temples (mosques).”
At the time they said the attack was linked to "Islamics" from the Middle East linked to Arafat and Saddam Hussein (the lies of the time); today it is known that the attack was coordinated by the American military named Timothy McVeigh.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
3. Those accused by the media narrative have public connections with secret services, political parties and/or security companies.
A key aspect that suggests a false flag is that the accused or the accused organization had or has links with secret services of the very country attacked by them! Many times the accused even appear in balaclavas or in images where you cannot see their face clearly to confuse the viewer.
Bin Laden, who was described as the world leader of "terrorism", before that was sold by the media in the 1990s (as we see in The Independent newspaper of 1993) as working side by side with the US against the Russians and being described in the report as a "peace warrior" as we see in this report from that important British newspaper of 1993. Bin Laden was declared dead without photo or video proof.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
4. A series of unanswered, confusing, strange questions emerge and are banned as "support for terrorism", "violation of national security" and "anti-Semitism".
Another characteristic of a false flag is obvious – the presence of a series of unanswered questions surrounding the occurrence. Although the media narrative that emerges shortly after the attacks ignores these flaws, they will inevitably remain for viewers who are able to think for themselves. A classic example is WTC7, the building next to the Twin Towers that also fell on 9/11, without anything hitting it, which was ignored by the media/official version at the time as if WTC7 did not exist. Ten years later they began trying to create a version to explain how that building ignored in the past fell.
A series of other strange events happen linked to a false flag:
- Change of that official version over the years
- Suspects are generally declared dead
- Disappearance of suspects' bodies
- Death of investigators of the case or of military personnel who would have killed suspects
- If there is too much disbelief about a suspect, he is swapped in the media saying it was a mistake.
Operation Northwoods - Wikipedia
NOTE: Many confusions of 9/11 can be explained by the fact that it was a false flag. The leaked document (from wikipedia above link) shows a plan (from 1962) by the US high military command to hijack planes and crash them into targets inside the US itself to shock the world, justifying restrictions on civil liberties and invasion of rival countries, an action identical to what occurred on 9/11 decades later.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
5. The attack always occurs in the morning.
Real military attacks are mostly carried out in the silence of the night or early morning so that the adversary is caught by surprise and does not see the attacking army's modus operandi. In a false flag the opposite happens: since the objective is to blame someone and justify actions based on that, it is (generally) done in the clear part of the day with several cameras positioned to film the event. Nero, when he made the false flag of Rome, ordered the city to be set on fire during the day to blame the Christians and justify a series of imperial political actions.
As we can see above, classical wars are done by the night but false flags in the morning.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
6. Prior knowledge, of a supposed attack, exactly as it occurred.
Another path that leads to a false flag is trying to find out if there was prior knowledge that a supposed attack could occur but that it was "impossible" to prevent. Going back in time, there was (proven) prior knowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack in 1941. As we see in rare images from the time, contrary to the current official version, everyone already knew about the Pearl Harbor event.
We see newspapers from the time warning local residents to be careful, the first "The Honolulu Advertiser" and the second "The Hilo Tribune Herald", both dated November 30, 1941, a week before the attack on Pearl Harbor.
In the book "Day Of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor", author Robert Stinnett, after 20 years of research, proves that Roosevelt knew about the event and that it was a false flag.
Note: Next to the Twin Towers there was a smaller building called WTC7; it also falls on September 11 (hours after the towers) without anything hitting it. A BBC reporter reports the fall of WTC7 hours before it actually fell because it was already in the script. If WTC7 was imploded, it is a sign that the whole operation is military because there is no way to implode a building in a single day; this is proof that weeks earlier there was a plan to destroy the entire complex with people inside the US working on it.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
7. Did a Drill happen?
Drill is an English word meaning "dry", but it is used in military jargon for military training simulations. When there is a false flag, try to research whether there was a Drill on the same day/moment or days before the event, even if it was not in the location where the supposed terrorist attack happened, because often the Drill is scheduled for a nearby location to confuse. Captain Eric H. May, former intelligence officer of the American army, stated: "The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by creating a Drill that simulates the attack you want to carry out."
If we go back in time, on 9/11, President Bush ordered 46 SIMULTANEOUS DRILLS with the "terrorist" event, which is a huge coincidence.
Author Webster Tarpley, author of Synthetic Terror: Made in USA, says that in the case of the London bombings in the 2000s, "7/7 bombings", Peter Power admitted on the radio that there was a team training to prevent terrorist attacks at the location at times close to what occurred. There were Drills in all the recent media "terrorist attacks", including: Sandy Hook, Boston Marathon, Charleston, San Bernardino, the Norway attack, the second Paris attack in 2015 and many others.
Why is a Drill scheduled to cover up a false flag?
1. Distract and remove key people from a government or policy who would not accept participating in the false flag and will be able to prove nothing because they were busy;
2. Confuse another part of the security forces that will have difficulty identifying whether the events considered "terrorist" are real or part of the training;
3. All police forces will not be able to prevent the false flag because they will be connected to the training, many even in classrooms on the same day as an attack.
4. Distract and confuse eyewitnesses, alternative media and the general public, because if someone says they saw local forces participating in the attack, the Drill will serve as an alibi for that.
5. The entire local defense system is compromised so that the false flag occurs, including computers, facial recognition, CSI, everything is allocated to the Drill training.
6. False flags in military marathons, military schools, political events, large music or sports events are common because there is already forcibly a Drill there; it is during the Drill that the false flag occurs.
# The image above from Wikipedia (from topic 6: Prior knowledge, of a supposed attack, exactly as it occurred. ) shows that the Bush administration scheduled (months in advance) military drills for September 11th, disabling American defense systems for the "drills".
_______________________________________________________________________________________
8. The official version, through the media, simulates that someone claimed responsibility.
Serial killers and mercenary groups have a tradition of claiming events to gain status; taking advantage of this: governments, secret services together with the media will simulate that someone or together with one of their BlackOps groups (ISIS, Al-Qaeda, Contras in Nicaragua) claimed authorship of the attack because this causes great impact on the viewer who does not know what a false flag is and increases popular support so that investigations do not happen.
In July 2011, an attack hit OSLO in Norway, killing 77 people and wounding more than 200. Today it is known that a Norwegian named Anders Behring Breivik was behind the attack, but that is not what was said at the moment it occurred. Exactly after the attack, newspapers from various parts of the world including the British "The Sun" said that Al-Qaeda had claimed the attack; at the time everything was Al-Qaeda because the secret services had not yet invented ISIS:
*To prove their version, the media said that Muslims "linked to Al-Qaeda" in a "Sunni forum" on the internet claimed the attack.
*And quickly it appeared in various media that Muslims claimed or claimed responsibility for the attack:.
How did a Muslim claim authorship of the attack if the Norwegian author was not a Muslim and, in fact, was against Islam? Because this "claimed" was falsified by secret services together with mercenaries. This strategy is widely used, through fake audios, internet or videos where someone appears with a black cap on their head: the person "claims" authorship to reinforce the official version and make people not believe it was a false flag.
NOTE: ISIS even claimed authorship of the CORONA VIRUS COVID 19. Showing how these black ops groups are fraudulent in their allegations.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
9. The attack only occurs once.
If we look at the RUSSIA X NATO war (which takes place in Ukraine), we see daily attacks from both sides for years, but when there is a FALSE FLAG, the attack only happens once. Strangely the so-called "security flaw" is no longer exploited by the attackers; the day after the attack all security was established (according to the media), but this is a lie. A security flaw (at a high level) would take months or even years to be fixed, and various attacks would occur on top of those security flaws. Since it is a FALSE FLAG, the attack only happens once, and from then on wars, genocides, ethnic cleansings, invasions, annexations of territories, etc. are justified.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
10. Immediate retaliation.
Political measures take years to be implemented; there are votes in political chambers, public opinion polls, analysis of situations, etc. But when there is a false flag, after the media's formation of opinion, to capitalize on fear, many of the proposed "measures" will be implemented as "emergency character" as if they were "provisional measures" that migrate to something like AI-5, Patriot Act, Nuremberg Laws, etc., where they were all created "as a reaction" to false flags. Following this we see measures creating dictatorships where an "elected" head of state migrates to intermittent power based on false flags (like Hitler in Germany), modifications or abolition of the nation's constitution, immediate invasion of certain countries rich in natural resources, etc., everything that would take years to occur happens in a matter of weeks or even days. The US, under the Bush government, invaded Iraq and Afghanistan as a "war on terror", but there is evidence that both wars were already set up before 9/11, which was the false flag pretext for these wars:
All media above are from old times, 2004, more than 20 years ago .
#The report says that days before 9/11, the decision to invade Afghanistan had already been made.
#The articles above, from the time, prove that before the towers fell on 9/11, the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan was already being planned.
# Months before "HAMAS ATTACK", Netanyahu already had a plan to a "NEW MIDDLE EAST" without palestine !
Source:
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Last edited:
