The Dalai Lama's Flight to India

[Master Chief]

On the contrary, it shows China's double standards.

China claims one arguments when it comes its own borders but accepts another argument when it concerns its ally.

I am just asking what is China's official position on Durand line is it an international border or not?

What double standards?

Read my posts and educate yourself.

The nation of Afghanistan ACCEPTED the Durand Line as its Eastern border. What happened beyond that frontier in 1947 is not their concern and does not alter that border.

The nation of China meanwhile did not accept the McMahon line at ANY POINT IN TIME.

Do you understand what "double standards" means, or are you just larping around here as usual?

 

[Jaeger]

D
Did China?

Was Tibet a part of China, when the Macmohan line was drawn?

 

[Jaeger]

What double standards?

Read my posts and educate yourself.

The nation of Afghanistan ACCEPTED the Durand Line as its Eastern border. What happened beyond that frontier in 1947 is not their concern and does not alter that border.

The nation of China meanwhile did not accept the McMahon line at ANY POINT IN TIME.

Do you understand what "double standards" means, or are you just larping around here as usual?

Nation of Afghanistan claims that they were coerced into accepting the Durand line, just like what China is claiming regarding Macmohan line.

So either both the lines are international borders or neither is.

 

[ety]

On the contrary, it shows China's double standards.

China claims one arguments when it comes its own borders but accepts another argument when it concerns its ally.

I am just asking what is China's official position on Durand line is it an international border or not?

You are talking nonsense as typical Indian always trying to deflect your losing argument. China has never agreed to and accepted the fking illegal Mcmahon line that some British had drawn on his map. Only fools logic thinks the two are the same. Next time, don't talk to me abut non-issue unrelated to the topic.

 

[ety]

Was Tibet a part of China, when the Macmohan line was drawn?

Only you Indian fools doubt it. Simple, look up your masters's Western world maps at the time

 

[Jaeger]

You are talking nonsense as typical India. China has never agreed to and accepted the fking illegal Mcmahon line that some British had drawn on his map. Only fools logic thinks the two are the same. Next time, don't talk to me abut non-issue unrelated to the topic.

Lol ..I am not even asking you about you Macmohan line.

I am asking you for China's official position on Durand line.

And marveling how your own logic is stumping you, because of your country's non consistent position.

 

[Master Chief]

Was Tibet a part of China, when the Macmohan line was drawn?

Tibet was not accepted as some independent entity by China when McMahon line was drawn Saar.

Now tell me again, since you are doubling down on your own illiteracy, how is Tibet's supposed position on the McMahon Line relevant in your analogy? It is equivalent (in the example you are cooking up) to a splinter faction of Afghans accepting the Durand Line while Kabul denies it. Do you understand now why there is no actual analogous scenario that you can then cite "double standards" for? Or shall I explain it yet again?

Indeed, the only double standards are Delhi's.

Delhi rejects Beijing's rejection of the McMahon Line drawn by the British, while accepting Kabul's rejection of the Durand Line drawn by the British.

You have your own analogy on backwards.

 

[Master Chief]

Lol ..I am not even asking you about you Macmohan line.

I am asking you for China's official position on Durand line.

And marveling how your own logic is stumping you, because of your country's non consistent position.

Nothing inconsistent about China's position at all. It is Delhi that is inconsistent. Read my posts carefully.

 

[ety]

Lol ..I am not even asking you about you Macmohan line.

I am asking you for China's official position on Durand line.

And marveling how your own logic is stumping you, because of country's non consistent position.

What is there fk non-consistent about China's position ? Do China have to agree to any country include Britain all the agreements or self claims it has signed or made with other countries. What a stupid claim.

 

[Jaeger]

Tibet was not accepted as some independent entity by China when McMahon line was drawn Saar.

Now tell me again, since you are doubling down on your own illiteracy, how is Tibet's supposed position on the McMahon Line relevant in your analogy? It is equivalent (in the example you are cooking up) to a splinter faction of Afghans accepting the Durand Line while Kabul denies it. Do you understand now why there is no actual analogous scenario that you can then cite "double standards" for? Or shall I explain it yet again?

Indeed, the only double standards are Delhi's.

Delhi rejects Beijing's rejection of the McMahon Line drawn by the British, while accepting Kabul's rejection of the Durand Line drawn by the British.

You have your own analogy on backwards.

If Tibet was not an independent entity, then how was Tibeten government able to travel to India and sign agreement with the British on boundary demarcation?

India accepts both Macmohan and Durand lines. How about Pakistan?

 

[Jaeger]

What is there fk non-consistent about China's position ? Do China have to agree to any country include Britain all the agreements or self claims it has signed or made with other countries. What a stupid claim.

No China does not need to.

That is why I am asking what is China's position on Durand line.
Is it an international border or not?

 

[Master Chief]

Nation of Afghanistan claims that they were coerced into accepting the Durand line, just like what China is claiming regarding Macmohan line.

So either both the lines are international borders or neither is.

Saar, Afghanistan NEVER claimed such a thing til after the British left. Do not fabricate fantasies to support your bizarre ululations.

Afghanistan ACCEPTED the Durand Line. What happened BEYOND ITS BORDER in 1947 is irrelevant to that decision.

 

[Master Chief]

@Jaeger

Now produce a document authorised by Beijing that accepted the McMahon Line.

 

[Jaeger]

@Jaeger

Now produce a document authorised by Beijing that accepted the McMahon Line.

When Bejing was not control of Tibet. How can it sign any agreement on Tibet's behalf.

 

[Jaeger]

Saar, Afghanistan NEVER claimed such a thing til after the British left. Do not fabricate fantasies to support your bizarre ululations.

Afghanistan ACCEPTED the Durand Line. What happened BEYOND ITS BORDER in 1947 is irrelevant to that decision.

View attachment 194629

Afghanistan might have accepted the agreement back then after loosing the war to British.

But they certainly do dispute the agreement now as being coerced into signing the agreement.

Same as how China disputes it now.

Even though China did not control Tibet, when Tibetan government signed the Macmohan line border demarcation agreement.

It all comes down to the same the thing either both the border demarcation agreement that British signed are valid or both are not.
What is Pakistan's position on it?

You can not have your cake and eat it too.