The death of US defense autonomy - 2027 National Defense Authorization Act

Yes, saw that. Thanks.

Am interested in the various discussions, etc. Can often find nuggets in there. Sort of like the latest posts over in US Economy regarding April and May jobs reports. A little digging suggests things may not be as rosy as a couple of Twitter posts suggest.

Oh there is always a lot of background material and subtleties to absorb in any such matter. Just because some half-baked hillbilly wannabe sees a few youtube videos does not an analyst make, it is far better to do some homework before departing in a huff just becuase they read a few predictable trigger words. :D
 
Isn't that what many here claim has already happened? Even that would then be nothing new. :D

Besides, this is also coming from you:



ROFL!
Can't say about others, my offer is for as long as Alexandra Daddario is my handler. I am a guy after all :(
 
Damn i will be disappointed if America become the 2nd State of Israel.
The irony of the statement is that they are already the second state of Israel; integration only formalizes this trend officially.
 
Ok, no surprise that I'm leading the train off the track. Need to spend some time today researching the NDAA. There's enough happening in DC at the moment regarding ICE, the anti-weaponization fund, etc. that I've not had a chance to read up on this.
That seems to be the trick/ploy here. While everyone is busy with other mundane things, pass this single most consequential bill to bring all of American military technology under the purview of the Israelis.

I hope Americans wake up and realize that the one bastion that they defended for decades is also being taken over by the Zionists.
 
While everyone is busy with other mundane things, pass this single most consequential bill to bring all of American military technology under the purview of the Israelis.

Sir, what language in Sec. 224 supports your conclusion? A defense collaboration brings "all of US technology under the purview of the Israelis" somehow? What does this section do to change what is already being done for years and years?
 
Sir, what language in Sec. 224 supports your conclusion? A defense collaboration brings "all of US technology under the purview of the Israelis" somehow? What does this section do to change what is already being done for years and years?
It brings all of the strategic defense initiatives of import under the mandate of "collaborative programs". This means formalizing deeper cooperation and integration across emerging and existing domains, including counter-drone systems, missile and air defense, quantum computing, AI and autonomous systems, cyber and electronic warfare, directed energy, and defense industrial base co-production, while facilitating pathways from R&D into procurement.. So instead of delivering to Israel via military aid, Israelis will be involved in development and scaling out (including partnership in manufacturing etc.). At that point, there would be no way to take the Israelis out of the ideation, development and scale loop. On top of that, the bill includes an "Executive Agent" (a likely ideological Zionist appointee) who will be hammering the need for this into generals and the likes at the Pentagon.

"U.S.-Israel Defense Ties: The House Chairman's Mark features a controversial provision (Section 224) that would create a cooperative initiative to rapidly integrate Israeli-manufactured technology into U.S. military programs of record. "

The above is a bi-directional program, it would allow Israel to potentially restrict sharing technology (if push came to shove) on systems developed by the US to even third parties. Lot's of implications.

I recently travelled to Amreeka and in the suburbs of Washington DC saw a large building with the sign of Rafael Systems. The encroachment seems to have already begun.
 
It brings all of the strategic defense initiatives of import under the mandate of "collaborative programs". This means formalizing deeper cooperation and integration across emerging and existing domains, including counter-drone systems, missile and air defense, quantum computing, AI and autonomous systems, cyber and electronic warfare, directed energy, and defense industrial base co-production, while facilitating pathways from R&D into procurement.. So instead of delivering to Israel via military aid, Israelis will be involved in development and scaling out (including partnership in manufacturing etc.). At that point, there would be no way to take the Israelis out of the ideation, development and scale loop. On top of that, the bill includes an "Executive Agent" (a likely ideological Zionist appointee) who will be hammering the need for this into generals and the likes at the Pentagon.

"U.S.-Israel Defense Ties: The House Chairman's Mark features a controversial provision (Section 224) that would create a cooperative initiative to rapidly integrate Israeli-manufactured technology into U.S. military programs of record. "

The above is a bi-directional program, it would allow Israel to potentially restrict sharing technology (if push came to shove) on systems developed by the US to even third parties. Lot's of implications.

I recently travelled to Amreeka and in the suburbs of Washington DC saw a large building with the sign of Rafael Systems. The encroachment seems to have already begun.

So is there a problem with two sovereign nations making such collaborative partnerships for mutual gain? It is not like either of them is being forced to do so.

The role of any executive agent appointed is according to DoD Directive 5101.01 passed in 2022, and is nothing new. What they can or cannot "hammer" into generals and the Pentagon will be according to those rules.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top