PAKISTANFOREVER
Trusted Member
- Thread starter
- #1,816
Bloody hell, they guy in the first picture looks like he has a jumbo jet on his head.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Back at uni, the highlight of the football calendar was the annual Islamic Society vs Sikh Society football match.It's absolutely ridiculous. The sikhs even claim that the alcohol problem they have in their community is caused by Muslims and Pakistanis.
Back at uni, the highlight of the football calendar was the annual Islamic Society vs Sikh Society football match.
We were mostly Pakistanis and Bengalis with a few amazing Arabs and Malays.
They (sikh soc) took it much more seriously than us and they got whooped regularly for their efforts.
It's beyond the thread subject, but sikhs globally GENUINELY grieve their missed opportunity in 1947. Now they are wandering, confused as to their true place, venting their anger at the one group that refused to be subdued by the Hindu and instead chose freedom.
Ultimately, they wish they could drag us down into whatever cope bubble they perpetually exist in.
LMFAO!!!!!! Paul wound up this LINDU who's trying to be more gorah then the goray....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
This disease is very common in India, and to large extend some Pakistanis. Its frustrating to lack of an official push-back at the state level. I do see Gen Z in Pakistan raising their voices. Mostly the illiterate Indics in the eastern side of the country have this Indian fetish. I am not an Arab, a Turk, a Persian, an Afghan, nor I'm an Indian by default. Oddly enough my DNA shows 0.2 Greek, and 0.4 Slav/Balkans, the rest is the regions of Pakistan plus some relatives in England around 1800s. The Pakistan military is the cause of all this confusion in our people. They have dictated who's a*s we should kiss for their foreign policy and loans. Every decades it changes from Arab to Islamic to runaway Westernization (we see the fruits of their labor in today's generation).Agree with this to a degree. But it has changed since our era where hindutva was not the visibly permeating global force that it is today. The hindutva narrative has been (deliberately) entwined with the eurocentric revivalist narrative, flagging Muslims/Pakistanis as the first enemy of both groups. Of course, if we vanished tomorrow, jeetistanis would be next, no doubt. For now there is a very real marriage of convenience between these vile ideologies and it is something our kids must be trained to recognise immediately.
The signs are subtle, but they are there.
When a child comes home from school and innocently says: "i learned about the evils of colonialism and partition today...everyone used to be together as one in India until the British came!".
No pocket money for a month if I hear such revisionist nonsense in my household.
We need to be very clear - INDIANS push the above narrative and whites play along for fear of offending some DEI curriculum agenda.
This disease is very common in India, and to large extend some Pakistanis. Its frustrating to lack of an official push-back at the state level. I do see Gen Z in Pakistan raising their voices. Mostly the illiterate Indics in the eastern side of the country have this Indian fetish. I am not an Arab, a Turk, a Persian, an Afghan, nor I'm an Indian by default. Oddly enough my DNA shows 0.2 Greek, and 0.4 Slav/Balkans, the rest is the regions of Pakistan plus some relatives in England around 1800s. The Pakistan military is the cause of all this confusion in our people. They have dictated who's a*s we should kiss for their foreign policy and loans. Every decades it changes from Arab to Islamic to runaway Westernization (we see the fruits of their labor in today's generation).
Few years back I was in Islamabad during Christmas time and every place I went to eat, they were playing Christmas music and the workers wore those Santa's caps/hats. It was unsettling for me to experience. I also went on a date with this chick who exclusively dates Westerners but gave me a chance. Turned out she graduated from National Defense University and worked in the NGO field (into itself a large red flag). She routinely had relationships with men who came to Pakistan to work as foreign NGOs. She loved eating pork which she purchased from super markets in Islamabad that catered to Westerners. She was proudly telling me her great parents were Sikhs. Had a lot of mental issues from what I could tell. She revealed she was in therapy.
The military is run by mental slaves which in turns pushes the same mindset into the population. Its a tough pill to swallow for many nationalists here but one that I had to come to terms with uncomfortable. Iran is the only one standing for Muslim rights, the rest are just colonized mental slaves doing what they are told to do.
If tomorrow every Pakistan in the West comes under dire stress, will these governments come to our aid or would they sell out as they have done during WoT?
Funny and how convenient that this sikh is talking about "brotherhood" with Pakistanis now when the white english far-right have turned FULL-RETARD against indian sikhs and hindus. Funny how this "brotherhood" was non-existent before 2025. Also, has this sikh forgotten how much the sikhs were supporting the white english far-right racists in their anti-Pakistani and Islamaphobic racism? These sikhs are some of the most evil and duplicitous people on the planet.


Paul Chowdhury is confused and/or trolling. To ignore him is the best approach.I was interested in your opinion on this given that this is an issue you have mentioned a few times. My 2 cents.
1. Zeeshan (smile2jannah) is friends with big Muslim influencers such as Ali Dawah and Mohammed Hijab as well as Dilly Hussain of 5 pillars. So Paul Choudhry is now (or for that particular moment when he was with Zeeshan) adjacent to such people.
2. If some Sikhs do want to work with some Muslims on a united anti-racist front then I don't think those particular Muslims will reject them in the same way they are willing to work with white leftists, Greens, anti-Zionist Jews. This doesn't necessarily mean they'd metaphorically or even literally jump into bed with them. No Muslim is going to start wearing a Sikh turban, wear a kirpan, marry Sikhs (not allowed in Islam) or compromise parts of his religion for them but in a political capacity they (Muslims) will work with anti-racist Sikhs or allow them to be part of a coalition which Muslims are part of.
This doesn't mean all Sikhs are great people or we love Sikhism in the same way that it doesn't mean that if we work with leftists or the green party we believe in what they believe.
View attachment 210503
View attachment 210504
3. Just on a tangential point I think that Paul Choudhry guy was trying to tap into pan-Punjabism with Zeeshan in the way he was mentioning how his (Paul) family were originally from Rawalpindi Pakistan and how they speak the same variant of Punjabi as many UK Pakistanis. I don't understand why those two were using the word "Musulman" (Muslim) in that video. We use the same word in my language, Sylheti, but Zeeshan is supposed to be a da'i for a universal audience and the global language is English so why is he being slightly parochial and using a desi word 'Musulman'? I think it's a bit off and seemed to hint 'yaar we are both desis yaar'. I don't agree with that and UK Muslims who are not Punjabi/Pakistani but Somali, Arab, Turk, other Asians wouldn't really jive with that sort of thing.
I was interested in your opinion on this given that this is an issue you have mentioned a few times. My 2 cents.
1. Zeeshan (smile2jannah) is friends with big Muslim influencers such as Ali Dawah and Mohammed Hijab as well as Dilly Hussain of 5 pillars. So Paul Choudhry is now (or for that particular moment when he was with Zeeshan) adjacent to such people.
2. If some Sikhs do want to work with some Muslims on a united anti-racist front then I don't think those particular Muslims will reject them in the same way they are willing to work with white leftists, Greens, anti-Zionist Jews. This doesn't necessarily mean they'd metaphorically or even literally jump into bed with them. No Muslim is going to start wearing a Sikh turban, wear a kirpan, marry Sikhs (not allowed in Islam) or compromise parts of his religion for them but in a political capacity they (Muslims) will work with anti-racist Sikhs or allow them to be part of a coalition which Muslims are part of.
This doesn't mean all Sikhs are great people or we love Sikhism in the same way that it doesn't mean that if we work with leftists or the green party we believe in what they believe.
View attachment 210503
View attachment 210504
3. Just on a tangential point I think that Paul Choudhry guy was trying to tap into pan-Punjabism with Zeeshan in the way he was mentioning how his (Paul) family were originally from Rawalpindi Pakistan and how they speak the same variant of Punjabi as many UK Pakistanis. I don't understand why those two were using the word "Musulman" (Muslim) in that video. We use the same word in my language, Sylheti, but Zeeshan is supposed to be a da'i for a universal audience and the global language is English so why is he being slightly parochial and using a desi word 'Musulman'? I think it's a bit off and seemed to hint 'yaar we are both desis yaar'. I don't agree with that and UK Muslims who are not Punjabi/Pakistani but Somali, Arab, Turk, other Asians wouldn't really jive with that sort of thing.