UK Racism against Muslims and Brown people

[Mobius]

 

[Mobius]

LMAO!!!!

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

Very true. Boris, Priti and Rishi are also top tier anti-Pakistan personalities, happy to stoke whites and Pakistanis into conflict. There is a definite pattern of culprits, with rare misfit outliers

View attachment 213230

The indian hindus and sikhs thought that they would merge with the white european racists and target Muslims only. In reality the EXACT opposite happened and the white racists turned on the indian hindus and sikhs to the point where anti-indian racism is now encouraged by the british far-right.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

LMAO!!!!

This is what the descendants of the british empire have now amounted to. Within a span of 80 years, this is how low they have fallen...........

 

[Anatolia]

The indian hindus and sikhs thought that they would merge with the white european racists and target Muslims only. In reality the EXACT opposite happened and the white racists turned on the indian hindus and sikhs to the point where anti-indian racism is now encouraged by the british far-right.

You’re framing it like there was ever some kind of “alliance” between white nationalists and Indian communities, and that’s just not how the UK far‑right has ever operated. There wasn’t a honeymoon period followed by a betrayal — there was never a shared project in the first place.

The clue is in the name: white nationalism. It’s built around an exclusionary identity that doesn’t include South Asians, doesn’t include Sikhs, doesn’t include Hindus, doesn’t include anyone outside their own narrow definition of “British.” The far‑right in the UK has always treated all non‑white groups as outsiders. If anything, they simply shift focus depending on the political moment — sometimes Muslims, sometimes Eastern Europeans, sometimes Indians, sometimes Afro‑Caribbean communities. But the underlying ideology hasn’t changed.

What you’re seeing now isn’t a “turning on” or a “betrayal.” It’s just the same old far‑right worldview being applied consistently: anyone who isn’t part of their imagined ethnic core eventually gets targeted. There was never a period where they genuinely embraced Indians or Sikhs; there were just moments where other groups were louder in their rhetoric. The hostility was always there.

They are called dotheads for a reason. Hope this helps.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

You’re framing it like there was ever some kind of “alliance” between white nationalists and Indian communities, and that’s just not how the UK far‑right has ever operated. There wasn’t a honeymoon period followed by a betrayal — there was never a shared project in the first place.

The clue is in the name: white nationalism. It’s built around an exclusionary identity that doesn’t include South Asians, doesn’t include Sikhs, doesn’t include Hindus, doesn’t include anyone outside their own narrow definition of “British.” The far‑right in the UK has always treated all non‑white groups as outsiders. If anything, they simply shift focus depending on the political moment — sometimes Muslims, sometimes Eastern Europeans, sometimes Indians, sometimes Afro‑Caribbean communities. But the underlying ideology hasn’t changed.

What you’re seeing now isn’t a “turning on” or a “betrayal.” It’s just the same old far‑right worldview being applied consistently: anyone who isn’t part of their imagined ethnic core eventually gets targeted. There was never a period where they genuinely embraced Indians or Sikhs; there were just moments where other groups were louder in their rhetoric. The hostility was always there.

They are called dotheads for a reason. Hope this helps.

You are right. However, there was a time when indians in the uk THOUGHT that they could merge and form an alliance with the british far-right. The white english NEVER wanted an alliance with the indians BUT the indians CERTAINLY wanted an alliance with the british far-right.

 

[hussain0216]

I would assume the orange is Indian Muslims for us

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

View attachment 213313

I would assume the orange is Indian Muslims for us

37% of american-Pakistani men marry non-Pakistani women????????????.................WTF!!!!!!!!!!.........................

19% of american-Pakistan women engage in race-mixing. 18% less than the men. So the rate of race-mixing of american-Pakistani men is nearly twice that of american-Pakistani women. At this rate, the american-Pakistani community will die out with 4 or 5 generations................

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

37% of american-Pakistani men marry non-Pakistani women????????????.................WTF!!!!!!!!!!.........................

What about the American-Pakistani females?

 

[Master Chief]

37% of american-Pakistani men marry non-Pakistani women????????????.................WTF!!!!!!!!!!.........................

I knew you'd have a benny when you saw that. Lolz.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

I knew you'd have a benny when you saw that. Lolz.

Seems like the american-Pakistani community want to make themselves go extinct..........very sad............

 

[Mobius]

Seems like the american-Pakistani community want to make themselves go extinct..........very sad............

Goriyan ka attraction he kuch aur hay yaar!