UK Racism against Muslims and Brown people

[Yasser76]

Most Jamaicans have now integrated into white english society and are breeding with working class white english women. The Jamaicans are pretty much dying out. Their offspring are mainly half-castes who are very pro-white european. They are not the force they once were between the 1970s and 1990s.

It's really only uk Pakistanis who are fighting against the white english racists. ALL other non-white groups in the uk including non-Pakistani Muslims are worshipping the white european races and their women folk are desperate and see it as a badge of honour to breed with white european men.

Very true, in 80s and 90s they were very much at the forefront of smacking racists around, less so these days but still some pockets like in St Pauls in Bristol and Brixton in London.

Never seen a Jamaican be racist to anyone

 

[PakistanLVR]

A liberal white woman in the west is not the same as a liberal Muslim woman in the west. They are TWO COMPLETELY different things. Liberal so called "Muslim" women in the west is a code or cover for Muslim women becoming prostitutes for men of other races/religions and then breeding mixed breed sprogs. Liberal White women means women who don't follow traditional conservative values but maintain racial coherence and purity.

You hit the nail on the head. I've been meeting women to court - and I have luck, but I am running into a very specific problem, liberal Pakistani women who drink, has have intimate physical relationships with Whites and non-Muslims/Pakistani men.

I have a very strong filter but still I try to give them the benefit of the doubt so my conscious is clear. I have pre-filters which unfortunately have worked all too well and kinda making me a little comprehension about continuing with the process.

I Talked to someone through a matchmaker recently. Expected more traditional and grounded given the setup, but the lifestyle and history didn’t line up — drinking, dated outside the faith, and overall more progressive than I wanted. Ended it once that was clear.

It reminded me why a lot of us feel a certain way when women from our own background date outside and then look to settle inside. It reads like the outside options were preferred when available and the in-group is the later, safer choice. Doesn’t feel equal, especially when the norms are stricter on our side. Same pattern shows up with a lot of the white and Muslim guys I know; less so in some other groups for different historical and religious reasons.

Anyway, filter worked. Moving on.

It’s general enough that nothing identifies her, while still covering the main points.
Here’s a clean bullet list of the signs:

Visual / Appearance

• Nose ring

• Bleached blonde hair

• Blue or light-colored contacts

• Heavy glam makeup and polished “Instagram” styling

• Revealing or fashion-forward clothing (tight dresses, leather pants, off-shoulder tops, feather pieces, etc.)

• Visible tan lines while claiming to be pious

Photos & Social Presentation

• Pictures in bars, lounges, rooftop bars, or nightlife settings

• High-end shopping or luxury-brand photos

• Frequent “getting dolled up” or party photos

• Travel photos from places like Bali or Miami

Lifestyle & Profile Claims

• Profile says “practicing Muslim” / “faith is my greatest strength” while photos show the opposite aesthetic

• Drinks (even “sometimes” or “a cocktail/wine”)

• Liberal or progressive politics listed

• Sound-bowl, wellness, or new-age class mentions

• Sorority or heavy non-Muslim friend group

Dating & Behavior

• History of dating outside the faith or culture (Hindu, White, etc.)

• Still on dating apps while talking

• Okay with talking to multiple people at once

• Low religious practice (doesn’t pray, treats Islamic boundaries as optional)

• Quick repositioning toward “traditional” or in-group options after a more liberal phase

These are the markers that have repeatedly clustered together for me.

I've learned through my own feelings and reading ton of material on this:
Men often hold women from their own group to a stricter standard on dating outside because those women represent the group’s continuity, status, and norms in a way out-group women do not.

Core reasons

In-group women carry the group’s status.

When a woman from the same background dates outside and later returns to settle inside, many men read it as her having preferred the outside options when they were available, with the in-group man becoming the safer or more practical choice later. That ranking feels like a status loss for the group. An out-group woman’s past doesn’t implicate the group at all.

Loyalty and reciprocity expectations.

Men typically face stronger social penalties for dating outside their group. Women often face fewer. When an in-group woman dates outside and then wants an in-group man for marriage or stability, it can feel like she benefited from looser rules while the men who stayed inside the norms are treated as the default later option. Out-group women were never under those same expectations.

Paternity, selectivity, and long-term investment.

Men are more sensitive to cues about a woman’s past selectivity. A history of out-group relationships raises questions (fair or not) about whether the later in-group choice is genuine preference or a practical fallback. This concern is stronger for in-group women because they are expected to transmit the group’s identity and values. Out-group women don’t carry that same weight.

Group continuity.

In communities that value endogamy (ethnic, religious, or cultural), in-group women are treated as carriers of that continuity. Dating outside and returning is often seen as free-riding on the group’s cohesion. The same behavior from an outsider doesn’t threaten that continuity.

This pattern shows up across many different groups (ethnic, religious, national) because the underlying incentives are similar: in-group women are held to higher loyalty and purity standards precisely because they are viewed as representing the group’s future in a way outsiders are not.