j_hungary
Professional
AI report is meaningless unless we know the data it used to arrive at the conclusion. Here is what Google AI says:
The First and Second Chechen Wars resulted in a significant number of civilian deaths. Estimates range widely, but generally, the First Chechen War (1994-1996) caused an estimated 20,000 to 100,000 civilian casualties, according to various sources, while the Second Chechen War (1999-2000) resulted in an estimated 13,000 civilian casualties. The combined civilian death toll from both wars is estimated to be between 50,000 and 160,000.
Again, that's why I don't believe in any of the numbers if I were to look at wars.....
The Lancet is the most prestigious medical journal in the world. These researchers are medical personnel and they explained how they came up with the number. They also explained how the UN and other organizations are underestimating the casualties by as much as 41% because they fail to count civilians who die because of secondary effects of war. Once again, these are medical professionals reporting in the world's most prestigious medical journal.
You are now just repeating my point, UN estimate is 35000, Lancet is 64000 at the same period of time, while I read somewhere PA Health Office release a number somewhere between 50000 til 2025, so which one is real?
And you don't need medical people to report number, in fact, I used to work in similar capacity actually partnership with UN, all you need is data/statistical analysis, because most of these people won't actually be in Palestine or Gronzy counting the body, they get number from every source and report to the people who compile reports. Those report can vary very depends on where or how a source is used.
And I think this had gone over the topic for a long mile, as I said, I don't even believe in those number to begin with.


