US Defence related thread

MQ-28 Ghost Bat Boeing​


1785086401628.png

The Boeing MQ-28 Ghost Bat is a next-generation low-observable unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV) developed by Boeing Defence Australia as an autonomous collaborative combat aircraft. Originally introduced as the Airpower Teaming System (ATS), the aircraft was conceived to operate alongside crewed fighters and support aircraft while undertaking high-risk missions with minimal human intervention. Integrating advanced artificial intelligence, modular mission systems, and stealth-oriented design, the MQ-28 represents one of the world's most advanced loyal wingman platforms and serves as a technology demonstrator for future Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) concepts.

1785086635441.png

https://www.armyrecognition.com/mil...manned-aircraft-system/mq-28-ghost-bat-boeing
 
If current weapon can not subdue Iran, how can one expect to subdue China? Even if there is no Iran war and weapon stockpile is doubled, it is still not effective against vast Chinese landmass. China is about 5.8 times bigger than Iran by total land area.

Are. you serious???
You don't see the US bombing Tehran making it look like Syria or Gaza.

I think you can't grasp what war can really be like.

Gaza:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Aerial video shows destruction in the Gaza Strip

Syria:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Syria: devastation


Meanwhile in Tehran....posted TODAY.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

INSIDE IRAN 2026 : What is NightLife Like in TEHRAN !! Amazing & Unbelievable​


It's ridiculous thinking the US is using everything it could to subdue Iran.
How did such a thought come across your brain???
If anything the US is trying to avoid turning Iran into some disaster zone.



carefulAttack.png
 
Last edited:
If current weapon can not subdue Iran, how can one expect to subdue China? Even if there is no Iran war and weapon stockpile is doubled, it is still not effective against vast Chinese landmass. China is about 5.8 times bigger than Iran by total land area.

The entirety of Irans Navy was sunk, 90% of their military and nuclear industrial base destroyed. Half their leaders killed…

Irans ballistic missile force degraded to the point where they’re only launching 5-10 missiles a day.

The only reason Iran hasn’t been “subdued” is because the US hasn’t committed ground forces to overthrow the government and a single missile or drone maintains leverage over maritime insurance companies.

Irans economy is beyond cooked and the US has inflicted material damage on Iran that nearly exceeds their entire GDP.
 
Trump's social media account is promoting the following defense company this morning:

Screenshot_20260730-062826.png

Background:

Post in thread 'US Perspective on the Iran - Israel / US War' https://defencepk.com/forums/threads/us-perspective-on-the-iran-israel-us-war.31323/post-1274371

Post in thread 'US Perspective on the Iran - Israel / US War' https://defencepk.com/forums/threads/us-perspective-on-the-iran-israel-us-war.31323/post-1282401



Unusual Machines Makes $30 Million Strategic Equity Investment in Powerus to Scale U.S. Autonomous Drone Manufacturing Infrastructure​

Powerus



To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.



 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Lockheed Martin Scores $58.6 Billion Patriot Contract as It Continues To Cash in on Iran War​

The arms maker previously secured a $35 billion contract to ramp up the production of THAAD interceptors

 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
American company L3Harris 🇺🇸 completed the first bilateral flight tests of the Viper Shield electronic warfare system on board two F-16C and F-16D aircraft at Edwards Air Force Base.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
U.S. Air Force wants 16,450 more long-range missiles, and fast
The U.S. Air Force has told its biggest missile maker to build thousands more long-range weapons than it planned even a week ago, and the jump says a lot about how worried the Pentagon has become about running out of precision missiles in a real war. An amended government notice posted Wednesday raised the planned production quantity for the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile and the Long Range Anti-Ship Missile from 11,200 to 16,450 units, a roughly 47 percent increase over a notice that had itself only been published five days earlier, on July 10.

The two missiles at the center of this expansion share a common design lineage but serve different purposes on the battlefield. The Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile, known as JASSM, is a stealthy cruise missile the Air Force and Navy launch from aircraft to strike heavily defended or high-value targets from what the military calls standoff range, meaning far enough away that the launching aircraft can avoid flying directly into an enemy’s air defenses. The Long Range Anti-Ship Missile, or LRASM, is a variant of that same missile family built specifically to sink enemy warships rather than strike targets on land, and both missiles are manufactured exclusively by Lockheed Martin, the Pentagon’s largest weapons contractor.

The Air Force’s Armaments Directorate, the unit within Air Force Materiel Command responsible for managing precision munitions programs, said the expanded quantities will cover JASSM production Lots 27 through 33 and LRASM Lots 13 through 19, with deliveries spread across a five to seven year window and expected to begin roughly 27 months after the government finalizes a contract. That lag matters because it reflects how long it actually takes to convert a production commitment into missiles sitting in a bunker ready for use, a timeline driven by the specialized manufacturing lines, guidance systems, and rocket motors that go into a modern cruise missile rather than something a factory can simply speed up by adding a second shift.

A separate government notice, also updated Wednesday, raised a different, earlier batch of JASSM and LRASM production, covering Lots 22 through 26 and Lots 9 through 12, from 5,510 units to 6,645 units, meaning the Pentagon has now moved to expand production across two overlapping sets of lot ranges within the same week. Taken together, the two notices point to a defense industrial base scrambling to rebuild missile stockpiles that have been strained by years of steady combat use and by continued support flowing to Ukraine, a drawdown that became especially visible during Operation Epic Fury, the American military campaign against Iran earlier this year. A May report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank that tracks defense supply chains, estimated the Pentagon expended more than 1,100 JASSMs during 39 days of airstrikes in that campaign alone, a consumption rate that would take years for existing production lines to replace at their prior pace.

The notice states the work will go sole source to two Lockheed Martin divisions, Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control in Orlando, Florida, and Lockheed Martin Rotary and Mission Systems in Mount Laurel, New Jersey, citing a federal acquisition rule that allows the government to bypass competition when only one contractor is capable of meeting a requirement. The justification leans heavily on the fact that Lockheed Martin’s Orlando facility already runs the only production complex capable of building both missile families at full rate, complete with an established supply chain, experienced engineering staff, and manufacturing equipment purpose-built for these two systems, while Lockheed’s New Jersey facility holds exclusive access to specialized mission planning software neither the government nor any competitor currently possesses in a form that could be handed to another company. The notice also states plainly that no government-owned technical data package exists that could let a rival manufacturer step in, closing off what would otherwise be the government’s usual fallback option for opening a program to competition.

Lockheed Martin has spent the past several years positioning itself to meet exactly this kind of demand surge. The company told Naval News it has invested more than $7 billion since 2017 to expand capacity across its priority weapons programs, including roughly $2 billion specifically dedicated to accelerating munitions production, investments in facilities, tooling, suppliers, and workforce the company says are now letting it produce at higher rates and greater scale. That spending followed a 2024 contract worth $3.2 billion that set JASSM and LRASM production on a path running through July 2032, and Lockheed Martin CEO Jim Taiclet told investors in April that new multiyear framework agreements signed with the Department of War are expected to support production rate increases of three to four times current levels across its priority missile programs.

National Security Journal reported in August that a former intelligence officer warned a separate $7.8 billion JASSM and LRASM deal, though a meaningful step forward, likely would not be enough to sustain a prolonged conflict with a major power like China, given how quickly modern precision munitions get consumed once a real air campaign begins. The Pentagon has also started looking beyond its traditional missile manufacturers entirely for help closing that gap. General Motors and Lockheed Martin disclosed in June that they were exploring a partnership that would have GM Defense manufacture missile subcomponents, including machined housings, structural assemblies, and electronic enclosures, part of a broader push President Trump accelerated on June 11 when he invoked the Defense Production Act specifically to address bottlenecks in solid rocket motors, igniters, and guidance systems across the munitions supply chain.

Source:Defence Blog
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top