US Navy Super Hornet armed with 4 SM-6 anti air missiles

[huanghong]

Nobody except celestials believe CCP/PLA claims about their weapon systems. Sorry but that is a fact.

PAC 2 missile has a supposed range of 160km but we found out that is severely underestimated by US as PAC 2 shot down Russian AWACS at 200kms+

https://twitter.com/x/status/1761297194458734798

And that was a maneuvering/defending target dispensing chaff/flares and other ECM.

US even confirms kills using PAC 2.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1800050256270487659

celestials have no clue how their weapon systems will perform in combat under high-tech conditions.

So, the only thing you can do is to use your dreams to deny the real data, lol.
Of course, considering that you are the one who claims in your dreams that the F-18e can carry 4 missiles and a drop tank to reach a speed of 1.6 Mach, I have no objection to your fantasy.

 

[SolarWarden]

So, the only thing you can do is to use your dreams to deny the real data, lol.
Of course, considering that you are the one who claims in your dreams that the F-18e can carry 4 missiles and a drop tank to reach a speed of 1.6 Mach, I have no objection to your fantasy.

Chirese data aint data but propaganda.

Mach 1.5 with 4 missiles and a tank at 15k feet. It will have no issue going mach with 2 Aim-174B's.

F-18E can reach mach 1.6 with two aim9, two aim120 and a center tank? Really?
This is an official report from the US government's GAO office
View attachment 64563

It goes mach 1.5 at 15k feet doing a 9degree turn rate.

 

[huanghong]

Chirese data aint data but propaganda.

Mach 1.5 with 4 missiles and a tank at 15k feet. It will have no issue going mach with 2 Aim-174B's.

It goes mach 1.5 at 15k feet doing a 9degree turn rate.

In your dream? Please provide the official data source, like the report I provided from the United States Gao, instead of just relying on your own boasting or the exaggerated description of some UP masters.

 

[LeGenD]

"The F/A-18 Hornet is not considered slow compared to many other aircraft, but its speed is somewhat limited by design choices that prioritize versatility, carrier operations, and multi-role capabilities. Here are some factors that contribute to its speed characteristics:

1. Design Purpose: The F/A-18 was designed as a multi-role fighter for both air-to-air and air-to-ground missions, which means it needs to balance speed, agility, payload capacity, and range. This multi-role capability sometimes comes at the expense of maximum speed.
2. Subsonic and Transonic Performance: While the F/A-18 is capable of reaching speeds over Mach 1.8, it is optimized for subsonic and transonic operations. This allows it to effectively engage in dogfights and perform ground attack missions while maintaining stability and control.
3. Carrier Operations: The F/A-18 is designed for operation from aircraft carriers, which imposes certain design constraints. For example, the need for robust landing gear and structural integrity for carrier landings can add weight and affect aerodynamic performance.
4. Weight and Payload: The aircraft's ability to carry a significant payload of weapons and fuel means that it must maintain a balance between speed and the ability to carry out its mission effectively. Heavier loads can reduce speed and maneuverability.
5. Aerodynamic Design: The aerodynamic design of the F/A-18 includes features like a high-mounted wing and twin-engine configuration, which enhance stability and control but may not be optimized for achieving the highest possible speeds.

Overall, while the F/A-18 may not be the fastest fighter jet available, it excels in versatility, survivability, and effectiveness in a wide range of combat scenarios."

From Quora AI assistant.

 

[Afif]

People seems to be forgetting AIM-174 also has AShM capability.

 

[SolarWarden]

People seems to be forgetting AIM-174 also has AShM capability.

USN SM missiles have had such capability since the SM-1