US Perspective on the Iran - Israel / US War

[Aryan_B]

Sa'eed ibn al-Musayyib رحمه الله said:

“Do not call your Muslim companion with the name: donkey, dog or pig.
Because it will be said to you on the Day of Judgment (by Allāh): ‘Do you believe I created (such and such person as) a dog, a donkey or a pig?!’”
Musannaf ibn Abi Shaybah Vol 8, Page 536

Allah forgive you for your transgression. For Allah knows best.

they not my companions if they kill Muslims or provide bases and logistic support to those who kill maim and rape muslims

 

[Persian Gulf]

Iran bombed Pakistan and killed two Pakistani Muslims. Sit down and clam your misplaced sense of moral superiority. You let Hindu spies hid in Chahabar.

By your rule of thumb now, after Iran killed Pakistanis in Qatar, UAE and Pakistan, we cannot accept that and have the right to strike Iran or as usual it is one rule for you and one rule for others?

Spare us your sob stories

Iran bombed terrorists seeking refuge in Pakistan using the same logic that Pakistan uses to bomb terrorists in Afghanistan. If you don't like it, you can complain to your own government.

 

[royalharris]

These “fellow Muslims” that host US military bases and allow the U.S. to attack Iranian infrastructure from their territory? These are “Muslim nations”?

Spare us the sob stories…

View attachment 207637

No one cares about you. Don’t reply to my posts. Get lost.

 

[RescueRanger]

ISW Report on Iran/US conflict:

Iran Update Special Report, July 20, 2026

The Houthis' announced naval blockade against Saudi Arabia could result in an expansion of the shipping crisis in the Middle East.

understandingwar.org

 

[Persian Gulf]

No one cares about you. Don’t reply to my posts. Get lost.

I can reply to anyone's posts. Including to say that your arguments (and you) crumbled at the slightest scrutiny, which says it all.

 

[RescueRanger]

No one cares about you. Don’t reply to my posts. Get lost.

Royal Harris, lets just get back on topic. It's not fair to the handful of US members who use this thread to share their perspectives and opinions to have to read this petty squabbling which is totally off topic.

 

[The SC]

These are the coordinates of the Jabal Al-Fas facility

https://maps.app.goo.gl/Du5PeQnmVUP8VSUk8

There are three sites where waste was extracted from.. dust and rocks. The location of this waste is very huge..It explains that.. Drilling was done deep and hugely inside the mountain

 

[lightning f57]

have you been on a different planet to the rest of us. Have you not ready our earlier posts on this threads

You are wrong in that US is graded on ultra maximim obejectives its simply not. They along with their proxy started this war and have not only not achieved (despite massive advantages of size etc) any objective but their actions have resulted in Straits blocked by Iran. So not only not achieved their goals but have an extra one ie open the straits


We didnt expect Iran to survive an attack from US over 50 states massive advantage in population and resources and Iran is surviving and managing to close straits. Any neutral person has to admire their resiliance.

Why do you a Muslim speak ill of our fellow muslims against Kaffir Americans and their proxies in any event your American perspective should be on American perspective not here

US is graded on what it set out to do, not what you me or tom dick and harry says.

Lets recap:

Regime change - failure
Destroying nuclear capability - failure as they want to continue bombing nuclear sites
Destroying Iranian missile and drone manufacturing - not known, infact US intel is saying drone capabilities can be restored in months
Securing nuclear material - failure
Protecting GCC states - failure
Defeating Iran militarily - they failed to disable a single missile city - overall failure

trump and his cult follows cheer about destroying the iranian navy and airforce, when neither of those posed any threat to any of its neighbours

And now the biggest failure of them all is the closure of the SOH which was open pre-war. Now we are stuck in an endless tussle for the control of the SOH.

If the US objectives were to slaughter Iranian civilians, destroy their infrastructure like the threats to power plants and bridges, destroy an already dysfunctional economy well that isnt really anything to brag about and actually achieves very little in terms of end objectives. If anything makes Iran more desperate and lash out in that way.

So trump and his cult followers need to look with more inspection rather than drinking that fox news Kool-aid.

 

[The SC]

These “fellow Muslims” that host US military bases and allow the U.S. to attack Iranian infrastructure from their territory? These are “Muslim nations”?

Spare us the sob stories…

View attachment 207637

Those are real Muslims..they have never "allowed" the US to attack Iran, their only crime is to host US bases on their land..and we all know that the majority of the Attacks on Iran came from Israel, and the US fleet..none came from their bases that were mainly used for logistics..

 

[Persian Gulf]

they have never "allowed" the US to attack Iran, their only crime is to host US bases on their land..

do you realise this is a contradiction? the US is actively using these bases to attack Iran, including via ATACMS/HIMARS strikes launched from Kuwait and Bahrain against Iran.

if these Arabs did not allow the US to use their territory or airspace against Iran, we would have no reason to respond and attack them.

 

[The SC]

Arab leaders that work against Muslim interests are piglets and if you delete this your posts will be deleted

You just invented that!
Say clearly what Arab nations work against Muslim interests..don't throw that in the air just like that..

 

[Persian Gulf]

You just invented that!
Say clearly what Arab nations work against Muslim interests..don't throw that in the air just like that..

Well, what is the Arab interest in the Abraham Accords? Isn't this designed to protect Israel at the expensive of the Palestinians? Thank God that the Saudis have not signed this yet, but the Arabs that have signed it, deserve a lot of criticism.

 

[The SC]

do you realise this is a contradiction? the US is actively using these bases to attack Iran, including via ATACMS/HIMARS strikes launched from Kuwait and Bahrain against Iran.

if these Arabs did not allow the US to use their territory or airspace against Iran, we would have no reason to respond and attack them.

Yes.. now what do you expect!? Iran is not attacking only the US bases but also the infrastructure of the host countries..

 

[Persian Gulf]

Yes.. now what do you expect!? Iran is not attacking only the US bases but also the infrastructure of the host countries..

Which one came first, US attacks on Iran to start the war, or Iran's responses? ...

 

[The SC]

Well, what is the Arab interest in the Abraham Accords? Isn't this designed to protect Israel at the expensive of the Palestinians? Thank God that the Saudis have not signed this yet, but the Arabs that have signed it, deserve a lot of criticism.

3 or four on 24 Arab countries have signed that..and still you all generalize!

AND, we shouldn't count Egypt and Jordan because it was a war ceasefire not the Abrahamic accord..That only the UAE have signed..even Morocco with its million Israeli citizens had on and off relations with Israel since its inception..nothing new!