US Perspective on the Iran - Israel / US War

[Shags101]

Muslims are bombing muslims bro

But Muslim nations that could easily tell Trump to stop bombing Iran from their lands immediately aren’t doing it honestly I don’t know why it’s so hard for people here to see that war could be done in a minute with these countries saying no more it’s cost is way to much for little returns that we were initially promised

 

[PK781]

For the first time, the US Embassy in Cairo issues a security warning, inviting Americans to leave the region.

This is a first and i have a feeling and i hope the egyptians are prepared. This is a bad sign from Cairo.

 

[KAL-EL]

This is a first and i have a feeling and i hope the egyptians are prepared. This is a bad sign from Cairo.

All of this is a five-star fragging disaster

 

[Falcon29]

Iran bought this upon itself. There was an MOU, it was not perfect but Iranians thought they could make Hormuz their lake and overplayed their hand.

US spared many civilians targets and Iranians thought they had a victory of sirts.

Now that is about to change.

The MOU was basically let oil prices stabilize and allow more strategic supply into market before going back to war as demands US we're making to be negotiated over 60 day ceasefire were basically surrender. It's same 'deals' that Hamas in Gaza was offered.

Iran strategically made right decision to see through that and prevent stabilization of oil prices and prevent oil flooding markets to buy more time to allow for war while expending strategic supply which would have been resupplied basically.

The reality is US is seemingly taking orders from Israel to attack and demand total surrender and thus making it exisistential war for Iran. They cannot surrender unless they're willing to change path of last 40+ years entirely and join Western Camp.

This is not a good precedent that is being set by US and Israel ever since the Holocaust in Gaza. It's like they're trying to self rationalize genocide of Muslims. And I had many differences with Iranian regime btw, you can ask Iranians here how I was vocal about them too but I think in this situation they're pushed with their backs against wall and have to play Strait of Hormuz control/toll card until US drops other demands.

Israel itself cannot and isn't military capable of doing a judgement day style operation on Iran like they did in Gaza and Lebanon where they ravaged everything. They need US refueling tankers and munitions and much more. Many targets they don't have munitions to be able to cause a dent to, only US does.

So it may appear as a result of this that US is being rational and Iran isn't, but in background Israeli is goading Trump very hard to undergo a genocidal style rampage to try bringing out a surrender....

Trump let's them down everytime to buy time until a Democrat gets elected , maybe, and they Israelis maybe keep bringing up blackmail. The scary thing is if Israeis loses patience and end up assassinating Trump doing false flag operation. And even worse the Jewish deep state ends up accusing Iran or something to bring about a genocidal attack on Iran. If the Zio Cult resorts then they become an existential threat to the entire world that have to be put down even at price of Israeli nuclear attacks around world. Israel would need to be nuked many times over to set example to other nations as it would be worse than 9/11 scandal and be very bold to try something like that

 

[Falcon29]

Netanyahu sudden visits to US are very frightening. He must be letting Trump know we are gonna leak tapes, get into line. If they feel they're running out of time I won't be surprised if Mossad does false flag assassination of Trump to frame Iran. Iran has no intention and no where near the capability to take out Trump. The Zio cult in the USA does and have done to it to previous presidents. They even gave warning to Trump with bullet that grazed his head during ones of his rallies. And then they took out conservative figure Charlie Kirk in front of everyone to see.

Trump has three options :

1.) comply with Zio-cult blackmail and execute attack they want

2.) Risk being assassinated by the Zio-cult in event he doesn't comply

3.) Repent to American people by admitting to horrible things he did on tapes and resigning as President of USA so Zio cult loses leverage


It's countdown to 2029 to see where this goes. Good triumphs over evil so the Zio-cult can most certainly fail to manifest what they want

 

[Davey Crockett]

 

[ghazi52]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[ghazi52]

Iranian official says response to an enemy attack will not be limited to Gulf​

Ebrahim Rezaei, an Iranian lawmaker and member of the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission, is the latest official to warn of a strong response to any US attack, Al Jazeera reports.

“Our response to any potential enemy attack will not be limited to the Persian Gulf region,” he said in a post on X. “We will respond to all enemy bases and to the origin of the attacks from anywhere.”

 

[ghazi52]

Iran ‘never faced a president’ like Trump: Rubio​

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that Iran is confronting a different kind of US president in the form of Donald Trump, according to Anadolu.

“I don’t think the Iranian regime has ever faced a president like President Trump, which is someone that actually takes action,” Rubio has said in an interview with Fox News.

“They got used to, for 20 or 30 years, not just the US, but the broader world, allowing them to get away with things like lying, breaking deals, tricking people into agreements,” he adds.

 

[ghazi52]

Top US general warns America may not have enough forces to defend Israel from Iran: Dawn correspondent​

A warning from one of Washington’s top military commanders has exposed a growing dilemma for the United States: it may no longer have enough naval forces to simultaneously defend Israel against Iranian missile attacks and protect its own interests across the Middle East, a Dawn correspondent reports.

General Alexus Grynkewich, commander of the US European Command (EUCOM), has privately informed Pentagon officials that American naval assets are becoming stretched too thin as the conflict with Iran continues, according to reports by The Washington Post and other US media outlets.

The general reportedly warned that without another US Navy destroyer assigned to the region, commanders could eventually face a difficult choice between protecting American forces and continuing missile-defence operations for Israel.

Various US media outlets noted that the significance of the warning lies not only in the shortage itself, but in who delivered it. Grynkewich is not a political critic or an outside analyst; he is one of the senior officers responsible for managing US military commitments. His message reflects an internal military concern that America’s global commitments are exceeding available resources.

 

[ghazi52]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[ghazi52]

Trump says cancellation of attack subject to being able to 'rapidly make a deal'​

Despite having “cancelled” his attack, Trump has made it clear that this is subject to a deal being quickly made.

On Truth Social, he stressed that the deal, the perimeters of which had been agreed to, included the “Immediate, Complete, and Total OPENING OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT, and an end to Iran’s nuclear threat”.

Trump said he was cancelling the attack “subject to being able to rapidly make a DEAL” and added that “the country of Israel joins me in this commitment”.

 

[ghazi52]

Rubio insists US strikes made Iran more willing to negotiate​

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says Iran is more willing to negotiate, including on its nuclear programme and the Strait of Hormuz, as a result of Washington’s military attacks, Al Jazeera reports.

In an interview with Fox News, Rubio repeated his claims the attacks had destroyed Iran’s navy, air force, missile defences, launchers and weapons-production facilities, and had “severely degraded” its defensive capabilities.

“They still have missiles, and they still have drones, and they can still do damage,” Rubio said. He claimed, however, that Iran no longer had the “conventional shield that they were going to hide behind”.

 

[ghazi52]

PHOTOS: Memorial service held in Texas for private killed in attack on air base in Jordan​

People attend a memorial service for Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, who was killed in an attack on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, in Plano, Texas, US on August 1, 2026. — Reuters

Flower wreaths on the day of a memorial service for Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, who was killed in an attack on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, in Plano, Texas, US on August 1, 2026. — Reuters

Brigadier General Glenn Henke speaks on the day of a memorial service for Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, who was killed in an attack on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan, in Plano, Texas, US on August 1, 2026. — Reuters

 

[ghazi52]

Iranians likely believe Trump 'blinked' because of potential risk of escalation: analyst​

Ross Harrison, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute, tells Al Jazeera that it remains difficult to identify a clear US strategy in the war on Iran because Trump has repeatedly signalled imminent escalation before pulling back.

Harrison said it was too early to tell why Trump called off the planned attacks on Iran, including what commitments Iranians may have made to the US during Araghchi’s calls with his counterparts in Turkiye, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.

“From the Iranian perspective, my sense is that they probably will believe that Donald Trump blinked, because of the potential risk of escalation,” he was quoted as saying.

He said the latest announcement would not represent genuine de-escalation unless the US and Iran reached a clear agreement on reopening the Strait of Hormuz.