US Political News and Trump’s China visit

This redistricting mess is damn killing common sense. I’ve been watching this whole fiasco lately, and it’s getting out of hand. It feels like this all started when Trump pushed the state of Texas to redraw its maps mid-decade. Then California retaliated with their own map changes, and now every red and blue state is jumping in on the action like it’s a game.

What drives me crazy is seeing the "little guys", and I’m putting myself in that category too, actually jumping up and down and cheering for this. People need to sit down and really think about how destructive this is for us. In a real democracy, we the voters are supposed to pick the politicians. But what we’re seeing now is the exact opposite, the Republican and Democratic parties are picking their voters. How crazy is that?

We are literally handing our voting power over to the party bosses on a silver platter. All we’re doing is making the party establishments stronger while we get weaker. When we create these ruby red and dark blue districts, we’re making those seats untouchable. Once a district is "safe," the parties know they don’t have to work for us anymore. This is exactly why Congress has such a pathetic approval rating, they don’t have to care what the average person thinks because they know their seat is protected.

This is a disaster for our democracy. We’re creating a world where the general election doesn't even matter because everything is decided in the primaries. And we all know who wins those, the most rigid, extreme candidates on both sides.

The big losers are the moderates. Imagine a country led by nothing but those two extremes. What a total mess. We’re basically building walls around our own votes and then wondering why nothing ever actually changes for the better.
 
Bernie disagrees with you and McMorrow is just another politician for rent.

I appreciate you sharing that article from Bridge Michigan. I definitely don't think Abdul El-Sayed is a bad person, some of his ideas actually make a lot of common sense. But as someone who tries to stay in the moderate lane, I’m really wary of going to extremes.

For me, the "Abolish ICE" rhetoriv feels just as dangerous as the "Defund the Police" movement did. I have my business in Portland, so I’ve seen firsthand the disaster that follows when you strip away law enforcement without a real plan. I’m not saying ICE is perfect, but they need major reform, not abolition. They should have to wear name badge and body cameras, and they definitely shouldn’t be entering homes without a judge’s warrant. Completely abolishing them just creates a vacuum for lawlessness.

Then there’s the Universal Healthcare/Medicare for All issue. It sounds like a beautiful idea, but when you look at the price tag, it’s a $32 trillion gamble over the next 10 years, and that’s a low estimate. We’re already sitting on a $38 trillion national debt and running a $1.9 trillion deficit every single year. Adding another $3.2 trillion a year for a new system seems absolutely insane when our budget is already this far out of control.

I think we need to be realistic, first, let's actually start taxing the filthy rich and the billionaires to balance the budget we have. Once the "house is in order," maybe we can talk about big changes. But right now? Look at how both Democrat and Republicans have been running things. Do we really want to puut our entire healthcare system in the hands of that kind of incompetence?

My wife works at the hospital, and we have our insurance through her. It’s not the best, but we have our medical, dental, and vision covered. I’m not ready to gamble that security on a government-run experiment when the government can’t even balance its own checkbooks.

McMorrow isn’t perfect, but I see her as a better middle grounds. She wants to improve the system we have (like Obamacare) rather than blowing the whole thing up and hoping for the best. I’d rather take a steady, realistic approach than jump into a $32 trillion experiment when we’re already underwater.
 
Screenshot_20260510-225015.png

They must be playing Macho Man again at the Mar-a Lago. Trump has been posting several memes of himself being the greatest president of all time for the past hour.
 
Last edited:
Look at the direction the landscape has been trending. Not to mention the alleged irregularities in the 2022 election. Hobbs was SOS then.
Kari Lake wasn't exactly a stellar candidate either.

Failed run for governor and failed run for Senate.
 
Debashis Ghosh, 62, is accused of conspiring to defraud investors of $2.5 million intended for the construction of an aircraft maintenance facility, according to a statement by the US Department of Justice

The United States has initiated action in district courts to revoke the naturalised citizenship of 12 individuals, including an Indian man accused of fraud prior to his naturalisation, as per a statement by the US Department of Justice.

Debashis Ghosh, 62, is accused of conspiring to defraud investors of $2.5 million intended for the construction of an aircraft maintenance facility, as per the statement.

"Before Debashis Ghosh naturalised, he conspired to defraud investors of $2.5 million intended for the construction of an aircraft maintenance facility. After naturalising, Ghosh, a native of India, continued the fraudulent scheme, misrepresenting the location and safekeeping of the investor funding. But in his 2012 naturalisation application and interview, Ghosh claimed that he had never committed a crime or offence for which he had not been arrested," as per the statement.

"The denaturalisation complaint against Ghosh alleges that he is subject to denaturalisation because during the period in which he was statutorily required to demonstrate good moral character, he committed a crime involving moral turpitude, committed unlawful acts that adversely reflected on his moral character, and falsely testified about his crime. Additionally, Ghosh willfully misrepresented the material fact of his crime during his naturalisation proceedings," the statement read.

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act of the US Constitution, a naturalised US citizen's citizenship may be revoked, and a certificate of naturalisation cancelled, if the naturalisation was illegally procured or procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation.

"Individuals implicated in committing fraud, heinous crimes such as sexual abuse, or expressing support for terrorism should never have been naturalised as United States citizens," the statement quoted Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.

Blanche added, "The Trump administration is taking action to correct these egregious violations of our immigration system. Those who intentionally concealed their criminal histories or misrepresented themselves during the naturalisation process will face the fullest extent of the law."

 
US widens drive to revoke citizenship of foreign-born Americans

• Indian businessman among a dozen facing denaturalisation
• Justice Dept targets naturalised citizens over fraud, terror links
• Civil liberties groups warn of uncertainty, fear in immigrant communities

WASHINGTON: The Trump administration is widening its drive to revoke the citizenship of foreign-born Americans, filing a new wave of denaturalisation cases against individuals accused of fraud, terrorism links and serious financial crimes, the Justice Department announced on Friday.

The US Department of Justice said it had initiated proceedings against roughly a dozen naturalised citizens, including an Indian-origin businessman accused of defrauding investors of millions of dollars.

Officials argued the individuals either concealed material facts during their immigration proceedings or engaged in conduct that would have disqualified them from obtaining US citizenship.

Among the cases cited by authorities is that of Debashis Ghosh, a native of India, accused of orchestrating an investment fraud scheme involving approximately $2.5 million.

According to the Justice Department, Ghosh allegedly conspired to defraud investors before becoming a US citizen and continued the scheme after his naturalisation by misrepresenting the location and handling of investor funds.

The broader crackdown also targets individuals accused of terrorism-related activity, war crimes, and firearms trafficking.

The cases were filed by the Justice Department’s Office of Immigration Litigation in coordination with US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) and federal prosecutors in multiple states, officials said.

Denaturalisation — the process of revoking citizenship obtained through naturalisation — is a rare and legally demanding procedure that requires action in federal court.

Between 1990 and 2017, US authorities filed just over 300 such cases, averaging about 11 annually, making the current expansion notable in scale.

The government faces a high legal threshold, as it must demonstrate either intentional misrepresentation or the concealment of material facts during the naturalisation process.

The Trump administration, however, has increasingly treated the tool as part of a broader immigration enforcement strategy. Officials argue that citizenship obtained through deception “undermines the integrity of the immigration system” and warrants revocation when proven in court.

While the latest cases did not include individuals from Pakistan or other South Asian nations, the inclusion of an Indian-origin defendant is likely to resonate across the region’s large diaspora in the United States.

For these communities, the move is seen less as country-specific targeting and more as a component of tightening US immigration enforcement for all naturalised citizens.

The announcement comes amid a wider strengthening of immigration mechanisms, including enhanced background reviews and the re-examination of historical files for potential fraud.

Civil liberties advocates have previously warned that expanded denaturalisation efforts could create uncertainty within immigrant communities and discourage eligible residents from pursuing citizenship.

Officials did not release figures on how many of the proceedings may lead to criminal prosecution or deportation.

 
India born man among 12 Americans at risk of denaturalization as Trump admin seeks to revoke their citizenship

The United States Department of Justice under the administration of Donald Trump said it is pursuing the revocation of citizenship for 12 naturalized Americans whom officials allege committed offences that make them eligible for denaturalization, according to ABC News.

The Justice Department, in a statement issued on Friday, mentioned it had filed denaturalization cases against the individuals in courts across the United States.

The naturalized US citizens facing action from the United States Department of Justice are originally from Bolivia, Colombia, Nigeria, Somalia, Morocco, Uzbekistan, Iran, India and China. Some have been convicted of crimes in the United States, others are accused of offences in their countries of origin, while the remaining individuals are alleged to have committed immigration fraud.

 
This is setting precedent for many deportations. Even those that already have a citizenship.
 
This is setting precedent for many deportations. Even those that already have a citizenship.
Stripping citizenship from naturalized citizens is not unprecedented. I had posted somewhere in this thread the US has done some some 20+ times over the years.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Reflecting Pool repairs to cost $13.1 million. Trump had promised $1.8 million​

The Interior Department nearly doubled the size of the contract late last week, federal records show.

1778550301480.jpeg


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top