US Political News and Trump’s China visit

[ety]

Before Trump's first visit to China, China did not beat him up.

And China did beat him up this time.

Have to wait and see. Just look at his records dealing with other countries, China, Iran and US allies. Is he to be trusted in any way ? He has been anti-China to the bone since he first got elected.

 

[KAL-EL]

I remember a member of MAGA from the United States told me in the PDF that Trump doesn't drink a drop of alcohol. Perhaps Trump is just pretending to be a devout Christian in front of Americans.

View attachment 197330

Well of course he's pretending. He needs the Evangelical Christian vote and support.

But deep down he has nothing but disdain for them

 

[东风夜放花千树]

That sounds little bit appeasement.

I stick to my view.

I do not think the United States can obtain military rare earths from China.

American military companies are still on the sanctions list for selling weapons to Taiwan Province of China.

关于对美国军工相关企业及高级管理人员采取反制措施的决定_中华人民共和国外交部

www.mfa.gov.cn

Selling military weapons to Taiwan Province of China by the United States seriously violates the One-China principle and the three China-U.S. joint communiqués. It seriously interferes in China's internal affairs and seriously damages China's sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Agreeing to sell military rare earths to the United States would only encourage this behavior.

 

[东风夜放花千树]

View attachment 197292View attachment 197296
View attachment 197293
View attachment 197294
View attachment 197295
View attachment 197297

Here are part of the conversation contents:

Xi: Look at these trees, these are two trees growing together, they were planted more than a hundred years ago.

Trump: Are all these trees a hundred years old?

Xi: Behind these trees are trees that are four hundred years old.

Trump: Can these trees live that long?

Xi: Yes, there are also thousand-year-old trees in other places.

 

[大汉奸柳传志]

He had a very good visit to China in his first term with big agreements, then days after he returned to US, he tore up the agreements and started the trade war with China. Do you have much confidence in such person ?

Trump's biggest nightmare right now is not China

 

[MH.Yang]

Trump's biggest nightmare right now is not China

We can take a look at Trump's predicament. Once Trump loses his power, his family is likely to be retaliated against by the establishment, and his outcome will be similar to that of the Kennedy family.

At the same time, he needs the strength of the entire country to deal with threats from countries such as China, and the current system in the United States makes it impossible for him to concentrate his power and implement many policies.

What would Trump do if a group of flatterers kept praising him gathered around him at this moment? The answer is simple, be a 21st century Octavian. This can protect his family from being liquidated and also concentrate power to deal with China.

Perhaps Americans will soon have an Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire.

 

[东风夜放花千树]

Have to wait and see. Just look at his records dealing with other countries, China, Iran and US allies. Is he to be trusted in any way ? He has been anti-China to the bone since he first got elected.

It doesn't matter.

However, this visit conveyed a message to the world.

China and the U.S. have no intention of engaging in large-scale confrontation.

Currently, no joint communiqué has been issued. Trump said the news about China purchasing 200 aircraft cannot be confirmed.

During the Chinese Foreign Ministry press conference, a reporter asked about the purchase of 200 aircraft.

The Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said: The essence of China-U.S. economic and trade relations is mutual benefit and win-win; both sides should jointly implement the important consensus reached by the two heads of state, injecting more stability into China-U.S. economic and trade cooperation and the world economy.

I think it only indicates a purchase intention. If the U.S. shows goodwill, we will also purchase American products according to plan.

In 2017, Trump visited China. But after returning to the U.S., Trump chose to violate the agreements reached. China did not invest in the U.S. according to the agreement.

In 2025, the leaders of the two countries met in South Korea. Trump still did not carry out the agreement. China did not import a large amount of American agricultural products.

China has sufficient sincerity and credibility. Therefore, we only need to focus on the actions of the United States.

 

[VCheng]

China has sufficient sincerity and credibility. Therefore, we only need to focus on the actions of the United States.

LOL. Looking at only one aspect is a sure way to go astray on any issue.

China does not get a pass. It must be held to the same standards as are expected of USA for a fair debate.

 

[Fatman17]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Watandar]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

A pointless bill exclusively for PR purposes in an election year. GOP hasn't been able to find a Hispanic Clarence Thomas who will endorse all actions against his community, yet.

 

[ety]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

A pointless bill exclusively for PR purposes in an election year. GOP hasn't been able to find a Hispanic Clarence Thomas who will endorse all actions against his community, yet.

As I've said before, both parties need political hot buttons to stir up the base. And that is exactly what the Republican proposal is.

How many times over the years when the Republicans have control did they move to address the legislatively?

Answer: zero. Just like the Democrats and their pontificating about Roe and DACA as examples.

 

[Watandar]

As I've said before, both parties need political hot buttons to stir up the base. And that is exactly what the Republican proposal is.

How many times over the years when the Republicans have control did they move to address the legislatively?

Answer: zero. Just like the Democrats and their pontificating about Roe and DACA as examples.

They won't restrict Congresspeople from trading stocks based on inside info, but they want to ban them from becoming lobbyists once they leave Congress LOL. Another bill that exists solely so that it can be tweeted about in an election year.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5878817-lobbying-ban-congress-members-warren-scott/

 

[SolarWarden]

I remember a member of MAGA from the United States told me in the PDF that Trump doesn't drink a drop of alcohol. Perhaps Trump is just pretending to be a devout Christian in front of Americans.

View attachment 197330

Nobody believes Trump is a Christian he is just a fan of Christianity.

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

They won't restrict Congresspeople from trading stocks based on inside info, but they want to ban them from becoming lobbyists once they leave Congress LOL. Another bill that exists solely so that it can be tweeted about in an election year.

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5878817-lobbying-ban-congress-members-warren-scott/

Bizarre, isn't it?