Lulldapull
Trusted Member
AI is doing all this yaar......AI already has a report on you before the gubment agent gets to vet your situation as a formality.
The decision has already been made......long before human interdiction.
USA Deportations news
- Thread starter Davey Crockett
- Start date
The decision has already been made......long before human interdiction.
Developereo
Elite Member
We all knew that, this being a Pakistani site, it was under surveillance even before Trump. The only difference is that they might use the info for active prosecution.
Lulldapull
Trusted Member
Its obvious they're hounding anybody of color mostly, if they're not a citizen.
AZ_HighCountry
INT'L MOD
Yet, on the flip side of the coin, during the Biden administration, parents who spoke up at school board meetings found themselves labeled as domestic terrorists by the DOJ and investigated by the FBI.
Pro-life activists holding silent vigils outside of abortion clinics were labeled as domestic terrorists and arrested for silent protesting.
So you can understand this works both ways.
EugeneP
Trusted Member
No 'color' with Trump. Canadian, U.K. and German tourists and immigrants are being harassed and deported exactly like our Latin neighbors from south.
Why are Germans being detained by US immigration? – DW – 03/20/2025
Three tourists and a permanent US resident say they were subjected to aggressive interrogation and held for weeks without knowing why. In response, the German government has extended a travel advisory to its citizens.
www.dw.com
Members of British punk rock band UK Subs denied entry into the US
Three members of the pioneering band were detained and returned to the UK after flying to Los Angeles for a gig
www.theguardian.com
I’m the Canadian who was detained by Ice for two weeks. It felt like I had been kidnapped
I was stuck in a freezing cell without explanation despite eventually having lawyers and media attention. Yet, compared with others, I was lucky
www.theguardian.com
Developereo
Elite Member
It's wrong no matter which way it goes.
This is America where the Nazi party is legal so I'm not sure how the government gets away with these prosecutions.
EugeneP
Trusted Member
They are pushing an old 1798 (When the British were our main enemy) law on alien enemies to the extreme. Courts are shy to touch anything labelled 'national security'. It gets passed around like hot potato.
AZ_HighCountry
INT'L MOD
I wish I knew the answer to that question. Government has gotten way out of control and too many unelected individuals consider themselves to be above the law.
Worse, the people have allowed this to happen.
AZ_HighCountry
INT'L MOD
It is still the law until a law is passed revoking it.
Can you cite under which law the Biden administration was allowed to permit millions of unvetted undocumented aliens into the country and bestow upon them the protections they were given?
Even DACA was an end run around the Constitution and US immigration law. Trump 1.0 tried to end it then but the SCOTUS stopped him.
EugeneP
Trusted Member
I don't know the details, but the framework was some sort of asylum request that was granted conditionally to them appearing in front of an immigration judge for adjudication. Then there were many TPS (Temporary Protected Status) admissions. They were expedient but not illegal since asylum claim is legal.
Developereo
Elite Member
Yeah I know.
Apparently, the persecution of the universities was started under Biden. Something about violating federal laws by failing to protect Jewish students on campus.
Department of Education investigating Columbia, peers over alleged antisemitic, anti-Muslim harassment
The U.S. Department of Education on Thursday opened an investigation into Columbia over alleged violations of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
www.columbiaspectator.com
Trump just fast tracked it.
Hamartia Antidote
Elite Member
It was a Pakistani site originally hosted in the US you mean.
Developereo
Elite Member
Any forum from certain countries where political discussions are going on would be under surveillance, regardless of where the servers were located. US based servers just makes it easier to get records.
Hamartia Antidote
Elite Member
How can you not call this law something that undermines the Constitution
www.fairus.org
Six out of the seven judges on the New York State Court of Appeals (the state’s highest court) can read plain English, even if a majority of the members of the New York City Council struggles to do so. Last Thursday, the Appeals Court ruled that a law approved by the City Council in December 2021 violates New York State’s Constitution. That law, called Local Law 11, would have granted noncitizens (including many illegal aliens) the right to vote in city elections.
Article II, Section 1, of the State Constitution plainly establishes the qualifications for voting anywhere in the state. “Every citizen shall be entitled to vote at every election for all officers elected by the people and upon all questions submitted to the vote of the people provided that such citizen is eighteen years of age or over and shall have been a resident of this state, and of the county, city, or village for thirty days next preceding an election.” (Emphasis added.)
When New York City adopted Local Law 11, an estimated 800,000 noncitizens would have been qualified to vote in elections for “Mayor, Public Advocate, Comptroller, Borough President and City Council Member.” Considering that the total number of votes cast in the last mayoral election was about 1,150,000, the addition of even a small portion of those noncitizens to the voter rolls could have a profound effect on the outcome of elections. These noncitizens included green card holders and those who are “authorized to work in the United States” so long as they met “all qualifications…except for possessing United States citizenship.”
Many illegal aliens are authorized to work in the United States, particularly after the Biden administration’s profligate exercise of parole authority and Temporary Protected Status designations. Thus, within a month of stepping off a bus at the Port Authority terminal at the height of New York City’s migrant crisis, illegal aliens with employment authorization cards would have had an equal say in local affairs as citizens.
Since neither former Mayor Bill DeBlasio (who was in his final days in office when Local Law 11 was passed), nor Eric Adams, who assumed office on Jan. 1, 2022, signed or vetoed the bill, it automatically took effect on Jan. 9, 2022. The law was immediately challenged by a coalition of plaintiffs led by Staten Island Borough President, Vito Fossella.
In June 2022, State Judge Ralph Porzio ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and issued a permanent injunction prohibiting New York City from registering noncitizens to vote. That ruling was appealed by Mayor Adams and the City Council. In February 2024, the Appellate Division of the State Supreme Court upheld Judge Porzio’s ruling. The Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI), FAIR’s legal affiliate, filed legal briefs in support of the plaintiffs in both Judge Porzio’s court and before the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court.
The matter was finally put to rest last week by the New York State Court of Appeals in a 6-1 ruling. New York’s highest court firmly rejected New York City’s argument that the State Constitution leaves room for local jurisdictions to expand the grounds for voter eligibility. Attorneys representing the city argued that noncitizens should be enfranchised because they “pay billions in taxes and yet have no say in local policies on public safety, garbage collection, or housing — all matters that affect their day-to-day lives.”
Writing for the court majority, Chief Judge Rowan Wilson made it clear that New York City cannot circumvent the State Constitution’s citizenship requirement. “It is plain from the language and restrictions contained in [the state constitution] that ‘citizen’ is not meant as a floor, but as a condition of voter eligibility: the franchise extends only to citizens whose right to vote is established by proper proofs,” he wrote.
The judicial decision barring noncitizens from voting in the nation’s largest city represents an important victory in protecting integrity of U.S. citizenship and the exclusive right of American citizens to chart their own courses. That exclusive right of citizenship is one that voters across the country affirmed last November. Constitutional amendments explicitly barring noncitizen voting were on the ballot in eight states and all were approved overwhelmingly by the citizens who turned out to vote.
However, in some jurisdictions in California, Maryland, Vermont and the District of Columbia, where constitutional prohibitions do not exist or are not as explicit as they are in New York, noncitizens already have been granted voting privileges. And, as the ideological battles over immigration and voting rights intensify, further efforts enfranchise noncitizens will likely continue.
New York City’s Noncitizen Voting Law Struck Down by the State’s Highest Court | FAIRUS.org
New York State's highest court ruled that a New York City law that allowed noncitizens, including many illegal aliens, the right to vote in local elections violated the state's constitution. When the law was adopted in December 2021, an estimated 800,000 citizens of other countries would have...
www.fairus.org
New York City’s Noncitizen Voting Law Struck Down by the State’s Highest Court
Six out of the seven judges on the New York State Court of Appeals (the state’s highest court) can read plain English, even if a majority of the members of the New York City Council struggles to do so. Last Thursday, the Appeals Court ruled that a law approved by the City Council in December 2021 violates New York State’s Constitution. That law, called Local Law 11, would have granted noncitizens (including many illegal aliens) the right to vote in city elections.
Article II, Section 1, of the State Constitution plainly establishes the qualifications for voting anywhere in the state. “Every citizen shall be entitled to vote at every election for all officers elected by the people and upon all questions submitted to the vote of the people provided that such citizen is eighteen years of age or over and shall have been a resident of this state, and of the county, city, or village for thirty days next preceding an election.” (Emphasis added.)
When New York City adopted Local Law 11, an estimated 800,000 noncitizens would have been qualified to vote in elections for “Mayor, Public Advocate, Comptroller, Borough President and City Council Member.” Considering that the total number of votes cast in the last mayoral election was about 1,150,000, the addition of even a small portion of those noncitizens to the voter rolls could have a profound effect on the outcome of elections. These noncitizens included green card holders and those who are “authorized to work in the United States” so long as they met “all qualifications…except for possessing United States citizenship.”
Many illegal aliens are authorized to work in the United States, particularly after the Biden administration’s profligate exercise of parole authority and Temporary Protected Status designations. Thus, within a month of stepping off a bus at the Port Authority terminal at the height of New York City’s migrant crisis, illegal aliens with employment authorization cards would have had an equal say in local affairs as citizens.
Since neither former Mayor Bill DeBlasio (who was in his final days in office when Local Law 11 was passed), nor Eric Adams, who assumed office on Jan. 1, 2022, signed or vetoed the bill, it automatically took effect on Jan. 9, 2022. The law was immediately challenged by a coalition of plaintiffs led by Staten Island Borough President, Vito Fossella.
In June 2022, State Judge Ralph Porzio ruled in favor of the plaintiffs and issued a permanent injunction prohibiting New York City from registering noncitizens to vote. That ruling was appealed by Mayor Adams and the City Council. In February 2024, the Appellate Division of the State Supreme Court upheld Judge Porzio’s ruling. The Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI), FAIR’s legal affiliate, filed legal briefs in support of the plaintiffs in both Judge Porzio’s court and before the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court.
The matter was finally put to rest last week by the New York State Court of Appeals in a 6-1 ruling. New York’s highest court firmly rejected New York City’s argument that the State Constitution leaves room for local jurisdictions to expand the grounds for voter eligibility. Attorneys representing the city argued that noncitizens should be enfranchised because they “pay billions in taxes and yet have no say in local policies on public safety, garbage collection, or housing — all matters that affect their day-to-day lives.”
Writing for the court majority, Chief Judge Rowan Wilson made it clear that New York City cannot circumvent the State Constitution’s citizenship requirement. “It is plain from the language and restrictions contained in [the state constitution] that ‘citizen’ is not meant as a floor, but as a condition of voter eligibility: the franchise extends only to citizens whose right to vote is established by proper proofs,” he wrote.
The judicial decision barring noncitizens from voting in the nation’s largest city represents an important victory in protecting integrity of U.S. citizenship and the exclusive right of American citizens to chart their own courses. That exclusive right of citizenship is one that voters across the country affirmed last November. Constitutional amendments explicitly barring noncitizen voting were on the ballot in eight states and all were approved overwhelmingly by the citizens who turned out to vote.
However, in some jurisdictions in California, Maryland, Vermont and the District of Columbia, where constitutional prohibitions do not exist or are not as explicit as they are in New York, noncitizens already have been granted voting privileges. And, as the ideological battles over immigration and voting rights intensify, further efforts enfranchise noncitizens will likely continue.
Last edited:
Hamartia Antidote
Elite Member
Thanks Biden!! Countries kicked their most dangerous criminals into your welcoming arms.
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
Country Watch Latest
-
-
Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds (59 Viewers)- Latest: Persian Gulf
-
-
CHINESE PLAAF ‘FLANKERs’ - Su-27SK/UBK Su-30MKK/MK2 - Su-35 - J-11 - J-11B - J-16 (2 Viewers)- Latest: Beijingwalker
-
Latest Posts
-
Why the uk/british far-right racists fear the established South Asian communities the most (15 Viewers)- Latest: PAKISTANFOREVER
-
-
-
-