Vietnam Defense and News forum

That will be exciting event for the US, Europe, Japan, India, Russia and many other, when two communist countries go to war. They will laugh all the way to the beach.
Congrats to the new US ambassador to Vietnam
She is a bit small.
It seems the MAGA seek the endgame.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Not a single scratch while other car suffers heavy damage.
Not bad
Vinfast VF9 is built very solid.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
China, be communist or capitalist or imperialist never controlled never administered those islands. That’s a fact. Unless you can show any paper signed by the Han imperial court, can you?

Don’t you think it’s ridiculous to claim lands as yours although it lie closer to Vietnam than China? People laugh at you.
Your logic is laughable, because some of the islands in SCS are closer to Vietnam so they should belong to Vietnam. You people are just ridiculous as the Filipinos that make the same claims. If according to your logic, the Guam islands should belong to Filipin or Indonesia instead of US. The Channels islands off French coast should belong to France instead of Britain. Lol. The sovereignty of the islands have nothing to do with geographical proximity in many instances, it's just who came to first possess them. China has historical documents and artifacts showing that China indeed administered the islands and SCS since Han. But, don't worry, Vietnamese will never accept facts as always. By the way, why it is called South China Sea not Vietnam Sea by the international community ?
 
Your logic is laughable, because some of the islands in SCS are closer to Vietnam so they should belong to Vietnam. You people are just ridiculous as the Filipinos that make the same claims. If according to your logic, the Guam islands should belong to Filipin or Indonesia instead of US. The Channels islands off French coast should belong to France instead of Britain. Lol. The sovereignty of the islands have nothing to do with geographical proximity in many instances, it's just who came to first possess them. China has historical documents and artifacts showing that China indeed administered the islands and SCS since Han. But, don't worry, Vietnamese will never accept facts as always. By the way, why it is called South China Sea not Vietnam Sea by the international community ?
Are u serious? so english channel belongs to UK, Indian ocean to India? What’s about Japan sea? What’s about yellow sea? Belong to whom? Yellow rsce?
By the way you Chinese call it as south sea, we call it as esst sea. There is no South Chiva sea. It does not exist. Not in Viet Nam, not in China.
 
Are u serious? so english channel belongs to UK, Indian ocean to India? What’s about Japan sea? What’s about yellow sea? Belong to whom? Yellow rsce?
By the way you Chinese call it as south sea, we call it as esst sea. There is no South Chiva sea. It does not exist. Not in Viet Nam, not in China.
The international community such as US, European countries and other Asian countries call it South China Sea, meaning the sea was historically dominated by Chinese activities, that simple one truth. Chinese call it South Sea short for South China Sea.
 
Last edited:
Total Nonsense BS.
What nonsense? The Khmer Rouge at your sponsorship keep launching cross-border attacks into Viet Nam and according to your Chinese logic, ..Viet Nam should not do anything? As for Laos, we never went there until the Laotian asked us for assistance to repel the Thai military incursion. So the "Indochina empire" was nothing but an invention by China to make Viet Nam look like an aggressive neighbor while we had no intentions to enter Cambodia and Laos...which is way different than China who is always make use of the sitations to grab neighbor's land
 
What nonsense? The Khmer Rouge at your sponsorship keep launching cross-border attacks into Viet Nam and according to your Chinese logic, ..Viet Nam should not do anything? As for Laos, we never went there until the Laotian asked us for assistance to repel the Thai military incursion. So the "Indochina empire" was nothing but an invention by China to make Viet Nam look like an aggressive neighbor while we had no intentions to enter Cambodia and Laos...which is way different than China who is always make use of the sitations to grab neighbor's land
Did Vietnam Communist propagate to form greater Indochina ? Google AI answer:

Yes, Vietnamese communists consistently propagated and pursued the creation of an Indochinese Federation, often referred to as an Indochinese super-state. Rooted in the era of French colonization, their long-term ideological vision was to unite Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia under a single, dominant communist leadership. [1, 2, 3]

...

Post-War Reality

Following the end of the Vietnam War in 1975, this propagation materialized into formal geopolitical dominance. Vietnam formed a "special relationship" with Laos and established significant political and military control over Cambodia following the overthrow of the Khmer Rouge regime. However, this dominance also generated immense friction, leading to severe border conflicts and the Third Indochina War (1979) between Vietnam, Cambodia, and China
 
Your logic is laughable, because some of the islands in SCS are closer to Vietnam so they should belong to Vietnam. You people are just ridiculous as the Filipinos that make the same claims. If according to your logic, the Guam islands should belong to Filipin or Indonesia instead of US. The Channels islands off French coast should belong to France instead of Britain. Lol. The sovereignty of the islands have nothing to do with geographical proximity in many instances, it's just who came to first possess them. China has historical documents and artifacts showing that China indeed administered the islands and SCS since Han. But, don't worry, Vietnamese will never accept facts as always. By the way, why it is called South China Sea not Vietnam Sea by the international community ?
Viet Nam administered continously both island chains from the 1600s to 1974; that's close to 400 years. Where were China, you never voiced your objection, that's a clear sign you know those islands aren't yours. Even as early as the 20th century, pretty much ALL of your national map never shown those 2 island chains. If I landed on an uninhabited island in the Pacific, took a dump, and left for good; doesn't mean I own the island, same thing with the next guy.
 
Did Vietnam Communist propagate to form greater Indochina ? Google AI answer:

Yes, Vietnamese communists consistently propagated and pursued the creation of an Indochinese Federation, often referred to as an Indochinese super-state. Rooted in the era of French colonization, their long-term ideological vision was to unite Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia under a single, dominant communist leadership. [1, 2, 3]

...

Post-War Reality

Following the end of the Vietnam War in 1975, this propagation materialized into formal geopolitical dominance. Vietnam formed a "special relationship" with Laos and established significant political and military control over Cambodia following the overthrow of the Khmer Rouge regime. However, this dominance also generated immense friction, leading to severe border conflicts and the Third Indochina War (1979) between Vietnam, Cambodia, and China
You used AI to ask a question. Who wrote that answer to your question? Anyone, including Chinese sources to invent up any facts.
 
I'm being very realistic. The current status quo of the Spratlys island as it is now is not because you love us long time.
could you answer my quote with your expertise, not just spamming throwing x amount of missiles.
 
I'm being very realistic. The current status quo of the Spratlys island as it is now is not because you love us long time.
and again tbh, even Thai airforce can dominate VPF in any aerial engaement considering all your jets are obselete with zero bvr capability and zero awec, EW support.
 
You used AI to ask a question. Who wrote that answer to your question? Anyone, including Chinese sources to invent up any facts.
Lol, I asked that Google English Gemini AI to answer, Google is an American company in US. Don't dragging to talk nonsense here.
 
could you answer my quote with your expertise, not just spamming throwing x amount of missiles.
Then why does your government keeps the status quo in the Spratlys if you have gained the overall military advantage over us? History has shown you are not shy about attacking us in 1956, 1958, 1974, 1988 ...to grab our 🏝
 
Lol, I asked that Google English Gemini AI to answer, Google is an American company in US. Don't dragging to talk nonsense here.
Google still needs to pull information to return an answer for you and their answer to your questions must be based on any given sources out there.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top